|
|
Hello and thank you for visiting AikiWeb, the
world's most active online Aikido community! This site is home to
over 22,000 aikido practitioners from around the world and covers a
wide range of aikido topics including techniques, philosophy, history,
humor, beginner issues, the marketplace, and more.
If you wish to join in the discussions or use the other advanced
features available, you will need to register first. Registration is
absolutely free and takes only a few minutes to complete so sign up today!
|
10-19-2012, 08:06 AM
|
#1
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 126
Offline
|
back to basics, punch
how many people have you met in aikido (that have only studies aikido) that can deliver a good solid punch
|
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 08:48 AM
|
#2
|
Dojo: Charlotte Aikikai Agatsu Dojo
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,944
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
i am waiting for the aiki skirmish to flare up in less than 10 posts. waiting.....waiting.....waiting.....
ps. not many
|
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 08:58 AM
|
#3
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 192
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
I remember the Steven Seagal documentary 'the path beyond thought' in which one of his close training partners talks about honesty in training, referring to strikes. This is an issue too in AJJ, punches and strikes must be delivered with honesty, meaning realistically and not weakly. Whenever I train and I have to punch I do my best to aim for the person's face and while I pull the punch to a degree, for safety reasons, I try and make it a realistic attack. I'd personally like more training on the different kinds of strikes using the different knuckles on the fingers. I've got a book at home on Hakko Ryu Jujutsu, which includes the various strikes but we don't seem to practice all of them at my club.
Sometimes though we're taught not to punch but just to apply bodyweight through the knuckle and this against your ribs, underneath your armpits is incredibly sensitive and painful. I think a couple of pinpoint atemis to the ribs would take the fight out of alot of people.
|
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 10:24 AM
|
#4
|
Location: Edmonton, AB
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 802
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
I can deliver a good punch. Lemonade, ice, vodka, and a few other ingredients... However, in the context of this forum/thread, I'm fairly sure my knuckle sandwiches would be pretty soggy. Most of the Aikido folk with whom I've practiced and who haven't actually trained in a "striking" format are also quite likely not great at punching.
Cheers,
W
|
|
|
|
10-20-2012, 02:45 PM
|
#5
|
Dojo: Dynamic Aikido Nocquet
Location: Hartlepool
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 107
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
Quote:
Andrew Macdonald wrote:
how many people have you met in aikido (that have only studies aikido) that can deliver a good solid punch
|
The easiest way to find out is let them punch you in the face.
Let us know how that goes.
|
|
|
|
10-20-2012, 11:17 PM
|
#6
|
Location: Phoenix, Oregon
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 407
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
About as many folks as I have encountered "on the street" who can throw a good solid punch.... I notice that there's often a big diff between a punch that freaking hurts or would knock someone the hell out vs a "correctly" done punch from a martial art. I also notice that a whole boatload of mma knockouts come from very unclean, very out-of-alignment, totally telegraphed but from an unexpected angle, unorthodox punches.
|
|
|
|
10-21-2012, 02:53 AM
|
#7
|
Dojo: Shoryukai, Breda (aikikai) & Aiki-Budocentrum Breda (yoseikan)
Location: Baarle-Nassau
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 348
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
Quote:
Krystal Locke wrote:
About as many folks as I have encountered "on the street" who can throw a good solid punch.... I notice that there's often a big diff between a punch that freaking hurts or would knock someone the hell out vs a "correctly" done punch from a martial art. I also notice that a whole boatload of mma knockouts come from very unclean, very out-of-alignment, totally telegraphed but from an unexpected angle, unorthodox punches.
|
I only trained in kyokushin for half a a year, so my striking art experience is limited, but I think you're right. I also wonder about "correct martial art" punches. IME, some details are different from art to art. Particularly the use of the shoulder seems to differ. Also, some of the differences may be attributed to gloves (big / small / no gloves).
|
|
|
|
10-21-2012, 07:03 AM
|
#8
|
Location: Japan
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 155
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
Hya Andrew
Where I come from almost everybody can throw a good solid punch...including the women, after a beer or two. Spend time in the dojo though and you're usually fairly safe. We don't tend to punch each other ^^
All the best
Lee
|
|
|
|
10-21-2012, 10:06 AM
|
#9
|
Location: Massachusetts
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,202
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
Why would you expect people to be proficient at a skill they haven't been trained in?
|
|
|
|
10-21-2012, 11:11 AM
|
#10
|
Location: Phoenix, Oregon
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 407
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
I have never seen a pure judoka do a good, solid spinning back kick. And I can't even imagine a capoeristra with anything like a decent hadaka-jime.
My cat is a very flawed dog, since he has such a lousy bark.
|
|
|
|
10-22-2012, 12:17 PM
|
#11
|
Location: Massachusetts
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,202
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
Quote:
Krystal Locke wrote:
My cat is a very flawed dog, since he has such a lousy bark.
|
Love it. Absolutely love it.
This is a classic that should be enshrined next to the Circus Ponies, IMO.
|
|
|
|
10-22-2012, 03:33 PM
|
#12
|
Dojo: Charlotte Aikikai Agatsu Dojo
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,944
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
Quote:
Mary Malmros wrote:
Why would you expect people to be proficient at a skill they haven't been trained in?
|
why don't they? we spent half of our time in aikido attacking, why don't we be proficient with attacks? if we are not, then aren't we wasting half of our time?
|
|
|
|
10-22-2012, 03:55 PM
|
#13
|
Location: Phoenix, Oregon
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 407
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
What is proficient in this context? Am I looking to shatter someone's cheekbone when I punch my training partner in the face? Am I training to defend against someone who is standing in kibadachi throwing gyakuzuki?
|
|
|
|
10-22-2012, 03:58 PM
|
#14
|
Dojo: Aikido Arts of Shin Budo Kai/ Bedford Hills, New York
Location: New York
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,302
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
Quote:
Phi Truong wrote:
why don't they? we spent half of our time in aikido attacking, why don't we be proficient with attacks? if we are not, then aren't we wasting half of our time?
|
+1..... Let me see...... I run a school where I don't teach proper/good attacks so that my students can learn good responses to feckless attacks so that I can properly train my students to handle themselves in real-life conflicts... NAH!
Practice is 100% of the time. That means attacking properly, responding properly and everything else before, in-between and after.
Marc Abrams
|
|
|
|
10-23-2012, 03:41 AM
|
#15
|
Dojo: Aikido of Fresno
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 567
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
Quote:
Phi Truong wrote:
why don't they? we spent half of our time in aikido attacking, why don't we be proficient with attacks? if we are not, then aren't we wasting half of our time?
|
I was taught, and it seems borne out in my experience, that if you don't take the role of uke seriously you are missing more than half of the training.
As I reflect on this over the years, I continue to find it true on many levels.
The techniques we learn as uke are probably more useful and more practical in many situations than, and often serve as a bridge to the more glorified techniques from nage's side of the practice, and are most definitely part of aikido.
Whether "attack" is a part of aikido is a whole other discussion.
|
-Michael
"Through aiki we can feel the mind of the enemy who comes to attack and are thus able to respond immediately." - M. Mochizuki
|
|
|
10-23-2012, 06:02 AM
|
#16
|
Dojo: Charlotte Aikikai Agatsu Dojo
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,944
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
Quote:
Krystal Locke wrote:
What is proficient in this context? Am I looking to shatter someone's cheekbone when I punch my training partner in the face? Am I training to defend against someone who is standing in kibadachi throwing gyakuzuki?
|
proficient meant speed, power, accuracy and control. cracked someone's face meant lack of control, i.e. not proficient. when i punched someone, he or she will know that if they don't do something about it, i will take his/her head off. it will be delivered on target, on time, at the right amount of power, and if need be, can be stop within a cm of the target and i won't give away my balance. at least, that's the goal. and folks who practice with me will do the same. and not just about striking, but when grabbing, the uke's goal is to unbalance nage, without giving away uke's balance.
|
|
|
|
10-23-2012, 06:16 AM
|
#17
|
Dojo: Stockholms Aikidoklubb
Location: Stockholm
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 601
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
Quote:
Andrew Macdonald wrote:
how many people have you met in aikido (that have only studies aikido) that can deliver a good solid punch
|
Many who can deliver a solid punch. Many dojo actually teaches stuff like punching, kicking etc. Aikidoka should be able to deliver a solid punch but itīs unreasonable to expect them to operate at the same level as expert level strikers (boxers etc).
|
|
|
|
10-23-2012, 06:17 AM
|
#18
|
Location: Massachusetts
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,202
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
Quote:
Phi Truong wrote:
why don't they?
|
That's the subject of another thread, if you want to start it. The fact remains that if someone isn't taught how to do a thing, and you look down on them for not being able to do it, that reflects poorly on you, not on them.
In that other thread, if you should feel moved to start it, you might consider what you're really trying to accomplish and whether teaching people to punch is the best way to do that. I spent a lot of time in karate learning how to punch, but that was part of the point of that style. If you're studying a style where the ability to punch is incidental, you might ask yourself whether there's a better way to achieve your goal.
|
|
|
|
10-23-2012, 08:37 AM
|
#19
|
Dojo: Aikido Arts of Shin Budo Kai/ Bedford Hills, New York
Location: New York
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,302
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
Quote:
Mary Malmros wrote:
That's the subject of another thread, if you want to start it. The fact remains that if someone isn't taught how to do a thing, and you look down on them for not being able to do it, that reflects poorly on you, not on them.
In that other thread, if you should feel moved to start it, you might consider what you're really trying to accomplish and whether teaching people to punch is the best way to do that. I spent a lot of time in karate learning how to punch, but that was part of the point of that style. If you're studying a style where the ability to punch is incidental, you might ask yourself whether there's a better way to achieve your goal.
|
Another passive-aggressive swipe a someone who in good humor, is asking a legitimate question as to why a student should not be taught how to engage in good attacks. Why should this question be viewed as reflecting poorly on the poster?
This post (my opinion) should be the standard for what we look to achieve in a balanced practice:
Quote:
Phi Truong wrote:
proficient meant speed, power, accuracy and control. cracked someone's face meant lack of control, i.e. not proficient. when i punched someone, he or she will know that if they don't do something about it, i will take his/her head off. it will be delivered on target, on time, at the right amount of power, and if need be, can be stop within a cm of the target and i won't give away my balance. at least, that's the goal. and folks who practice with me will do the same. and not just about striking, but when grabbing, the uke's goal is to unbalance nage, without giving away uke's balance.
|
It is unfortunate that Mary seeks to attack the messenger when the message being delivered is not only valid, but contributes to a serious discussion as to the nature of our practice.
Marc Abrams
|
|
|
|
10-23-2012, 09:12 AM
|
#20
|
Location: Phoenix, Oregon
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 407
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
I can train for self-defense. I can train for "martial" correctness. I can train to learn to imbalance someone. I can train to win a fight. I can train to beat the snot out of a black belt in any number of styles. Each purpose is best served by a different style of attack.
I can accomodate my nage if he or she is training for one of those purposes. The attack I give will be in line with what they want to work on. But when my body hits the mat, what I will have given them in each case is a puzzle to work out. The pieces of the puzzle are the mass of my fist (and body behind it), the acceleration I impart to the strike through my efficient use of body mechanics and muscle, and the directional vectors my fist follows. The gift of energy is a huge physics word problem.
So yes, I should punch "well", but only as far as my nage's needs are met.
Lots of folk train for self-defense. They are not as served by facing a dispassionate, perfectly performed oi-zuki as they are by an off-balanced, poorly timed haymaker coming out of the deep south. The skill level of attack I see the most of in aikido class is pretty much the skill level of attacks I see when I am bouncing. Crappy punches that will mess a person right the hell up if they land.
The really funny thing is that my dojo is blessed with a godan in aikido who is also pretty far up there in a hard style striking art. His attacks are virtually indefensible. Really hard to stop him from reaching out and touching a person, anywhere, anyhow, anywhen he wants. And I have rarely if ever seen him throw a "correct" punch of the sort this thread is about. A whole different look at power, purpose and alignment. And it looks really wrong to a classic puncher.
I think it boils down to sensei (also ranked well in both aikido and a hard style) not telling me my attacks suck and showing me how to do them better.
|
|
|
|
10-23-2012, 10:05 AM
|
#21
|
Dojo: Charlotte Aikikai Agatsu Dojo
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,944
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
Quote:
Krystal Locke wrote:
I can train for self-defense. I can train for "martial" correctness. I can train to learn to imbalance someone. I can train to win a fight. I can train to beat the snot out of a black belt in any number of styles. Each purpose is best served by a different style of attack.
And I have rarely if ever seen him throw a "correct" punch of the sort this thread is about. A whole different look at power, purpose and alignment. And it looks really wrong to a classic puncher.
I think it boils down to sensei (also ranked well in both aikido and a hard style) not telling me my attacks suck and showing me how to do them better.
|
if you read my posts, i didn't mentioned anything about "correctness" or martial correctness or whatever correctness there is. what i mentioned was "speed, power, accuracy and control". i can punch someone while failing down, getting up, on floor, sitting in a chair, or in some strange drunken chimpanzee pose (why would anyone want to get chimpanzee drunk? they are not happy drunks!). and it will be with "speed, power, accuracy and control".
however, that's not the point of my posts. the point of my post is what is the percentage of average aikido dojo spent working/training on attacks, 5%, 10%, 15%,...what? then consider that we spent half of our aikido time attacking, that's 50% of the time, just in case folks didn't get the percentage part (higher math is my problem too, since i can't count pass 3, but mostly 10).
i don't have problem telling my folks that their punches have problem, but i also proceed to work with them to correct it. things like,
why are you lean so far forward to punch and put yourself in an off-balance position?
why are you stiffen up your body when you punch?
why are you holding your breath?
why is your other hand dangling on the side and not covered your center in case the other person decide to whack you?
why are you lean you head forward before you throw the punch?
why are you lean your head away when you punch and look like you don't really want to hit me?
why are you punch at me instead of through me?
why are you try to miss me?
why are your belt comes untie? aha! you looked down and took your eyes off me, so i whack you! *this did happen but not with me, but i was there and it was pretty funny*.
why did you stop hitting me in the face? keep do it until i can improve with my technique! (told this to a lady in my dojo after i spent quite a bit of time helping her working on the punching bag. i got to stop teaching folks!)
why did you not bring your knife hand up to block my Moe attack? and you need to watch all the Stooges shows!
|
|
|
|
10-23-2012, 12:21 PM
|
#22
|
Location: Massachusetts
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,202
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
Quote:
Phi Truong wrote:
if you read my posts, i didn't mentioned anything about "correctness" or martial correctness or whatever correctness there is.
|
Well, the thread started off by talking about "punching", which is what I responded to, and you said "why don't we [train people how to punch]". Now you're talking about "attacks", and there I agree with you. I used to think our dojo would benefit from a makiwara, but I'm not so sure about that any more. What we care about are attacks, not punches per se, and we don't really care about the correctness of the punch as such. I just whacked myself on the nose with a log of wood (you stack three cords and you'll get a little sloppy too); now I've got a cut on the end of my nose and a couple of mashed toes from where I dropped the log. I doubt you'd say it was a martially correct log attack, but it was sure enough effective
|
|
|
|
10-23-2012, 12:54 PM
|
#23
|
Dojo: Charlotte Aikikai Agatsu Dojo
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,944
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
Quote:
Mary Malmros wrote:
I doubt you'd say it was a martially correct log attack, but it was sure enough effective
|
don't knock the log attack. it's one of the most deadliest (is that even a word?) attack. my shin, toes, fingers and various body parts got caught in such vicious and horrific and did i mention deadliest attack? i used to study aaiiiiieeedo in order to handle such attack. that's why now i am going with prepacked, compressed, in seal package that is ready to light kind of wood. you got to be smart about this stuff, the art of wood war and all.
|
|
|
|
10-23-2012, 04:10 PM
|
#24
|
Location: Phoenix, Oregon
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 407
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
It's log, it's log, it's big , it's heavy, it's wood. It's log, it's log, it's better than bad, it's good!
We've all been pwned by something stupid, logs, geckos, whatever. I had a falling stack of maybe 3 or 4 empty potato salad containers mess me right up. Almost needed stitches. Combined weight of those 3 or 4 attackers must have been 200-300
grams.
|
|
|
|
10-24-2012, 01:03 PM
|
#25
|
Dojo: Aikido Arts of Shin Budo Kai/ Bedford Hills, New York
Location: New York
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,302
Offline
|
Re: back to basics, punch
Heck with the logs! It's the fruit I worry about! Luckily, the British military helps to prepare us for the very, very worst......
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piWCBOsJr-w
Marc Abrams
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:22 AM.
|
vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
Copyright 1997-2024 AikiWeb and its Authors, All Rights Reserved.
For questions and comments about this website:
Send E-mail
|
|