Quote:
Allen Beebe wrote:
The 法 (Ho) in 呼吸法 Kokyuho is commonly defined as "law," such as a "law of nature" or "Buddhist law."
|
Also, though in the Chinese reading (it differs little in this case) -- in 兵法 Bīng Fǎ, Sun-zi's famous treatise on war. 法 is closer in reference to the Greek
techne which we now separate into two aspects "art" and "technology" -- but they did not. And so our technology became ugly and our art useless.
There is a lesson here, I think.
Quote:
Allen Beebe wrote:
Of course Aiki Age and Aiki Sage, on the surface at least, appear to be a bit more discrete in their directional reference than Kokyu . . . on the other hand, if they are not linear in nature then where does the Age or Sage begin or end exactly? Perhaps there specificity is more of a referent of relative convenience rather than an absolute.
|
I identify aiki with the manipulation (法?) of pure shears. Pure shears exploit the
gyrational qualities of structures, statically and dynamically.
Juji or the perpendicular principle of action, alters the eccentricity of loads on the structure, to create shears from existing poised loads without altering them directly.
A wave is a dynamic shear translated through a medium. In a wave, the water at the trough edge is drawn under and up the rear of the swell. The crest is drawn over and down the face. This is the principle/law/method of aiki age and aiki sage/inyoho/kokyuho etc...
If pure shear is present both complementary actions are in action simultaneously in every case -- but, as in the breaking wave (aiki sage) or the tsunami's lengthy drawout (aiki age) -- not always obviously coincident -- dare I say, one is quite often
omote and the other
ura.