|
|
Hello and thank you for visiting AikiWeb, the
world's most active online Aikido community! This site is home to
over 22,000 aikido practitioners from around the world and covers a
wide range of aikido topics including techniques, philosophy, history,
humor, beginner issues, the marketplace, and more.
If you wish to join in the discussions or use the other advanced
features available, you will need to register first. Registration is
absolutely free and takes only a few minutes to complete so sign up today!
|
02-10-2010, 11:22 AM
|
#26
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 434
Offline
|
Re: Mysteries of tai chi
Quote:
Johann Baptista wrote:
... if a big, mean, and ugly brute just came up to you and shoved you back ...
|
I'd either fall on my arse, or take some big panicky strides and stop as soon as possible. Completely and utterly unlike what happens in this and many other videos.
|
|
|
|
02-10-2010, 03:57 PM
|
#27
|
Dojo: Aiki Kurabu
Location: Elizabethtown, PA
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,110
Offline
|
Re: Mysteries of tai chi
Quote:
Thomas Campbell wrote:
[i] I think there are a couple of different scenarios regarding the hop. One, as Jerry suggests, is a voluntary hop that one does when one knows that an opponent or push hands partner has you at a disadvantage, and you're about to be launched. It's a way of maintaining your frame, and quickly re-establishing your equilibrium... .
|
I do this occasionally when I get hit with a lot of energy that I know will not be pleasant to deal with - just another tool in my ukemi tool box. Of course if the focus of the training is to receive the energy and work with it in some manner, than that is different - but if I am attacking and someone gets my energy coming back at me hard, I will do the voluntary hop back to help dissipate the effect - much easier on my old body
Greg
|
|
|
|
02-10-2010, 05:42 PM
|
#28
|
Dojo: Aikido Institute Davis
Location: Davis, CA
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 29
Offline
|
Re: Mysteries of tai chi
Quote:
Mike Sigman wrote:
Yeah, but those people in the video didn't get pushed "really hard". That was the whole point. They were reacting violently to pretty small pushes (albeit ones that Phillips was fairly grounded and they weren't).
|
But the point is to assume that the force pushing them back is larger! If you don't assume that Phillips is right then you can't test any of his situations. He claims that by relaxing you can project the attacker's force back to them, so when he pushes he claims that his arm strength is not the major factor. We have to assume that he's right if we are to analyze any of the scenarios.
|
|
|
|
02-10-2010, 06:31 PM
|
#29
|
Location: Durango, CO
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,123
Offline
|
Re: Mysteries of tai chi
Quote:
Johann Baptista wrote:
But the point is to assume that the force pushing them back is larger! If you don't assume that Phillips is right then you can't test any of his situations. He claims that by relaxing you can project the attacker's force back to them, so when he pushes he claims that his arm strength is not the major factor. We have to assume that he's right if we are to analyze any of the scenarios.
|
What's the point? I'll be happy to have Phillips push me or "fajing" me. I knew his teacher and I knew what he could do and how he did it.
Mike Sigman
|
|
|
|
02-10-2010, 06:32 PM
|
#30
|
Location: Durango, CO
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,123
Offline
|
Re: Mysteries of tai chi
Quote:
Johann Baptista wrote:
We have to assume that he's right if we are to analyze any of the scenarios.
|
And no, we don't. If you go into every scenario thinking that it's mysterious, unexplainable, and the other guy is telling the truth, then you're beyond hope.
Mike Sigman
|
|
|
|
02-10-2010, 11:19 PM
|
#31
|
Location: Australia
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 641
Offline
|
Re: Mysteries of tai chi
Quote:
Johann Baptista wrote:
But the point is to assume that the force pushing them back is larger! If you don't assume that Phillips is right then you can't test any of his situations. He claims that by relaxing you can project the attacker's force back to them, so when he pushes he claims that his arm strength is not the major factor. We have to assume that he's right if we are to analyze any of the scenarios.
|
Well, this may be a language issue...but if not, I certainly hope you're kidding.
Assume nothing. Trust no one. Test everything
From that video, here what we see: one guy pushes a little, the other guy moves a lot. Ok. Question: if we discount the impossible...like a wizard did it, or some kind of mysterious Obi-wan esque Force Push (damn that would be cool), what are the likely possible explanations? Then, we can work our way through those, one by one, until we get enough info to form a opinion.
Mr Phillips claims he's not 'just pushing against the ground'; ok, if that's true, then if we were to remove 'the ground' (sitting on a chair doesn't remove the ground), he should still send those guys careening across the screen - right? Else...what he's saying and what's he's doing aren't the same thing
Or - if something takes X amount of force to move...it takes X amount of force to move. Ok. So...if you're going to say 'I can do Z'...well... Z has to generate X amount of force.
Last edited by bob_stra : 02-10-2010 at 11:24 PM.
|
|
|
|
02-13-2010, 10:06 PM
|
#32
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 407
Offline
|
Re: Mysteries of tai chi
Quote:
Thomas Campbell wrote:
|
David--
This is the example of taiji "hopping" in Beijing that should have been posted instead of the first clip in the quote above:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVJFE1OY988
Same line of Yang taijiquan via Wang Yongquan, who is the elderly gentleman in the chair in the second clip in the quote above. Wang was in his 80s at the time, and had suffered a stroke (which is why he was in the chair). Wang is commenting (in Chinese) about different jin he is using, how it comes from the back, and other miscellaneous remarks. There is a strong element of visualization in the training of mental intent ( yi) in this line of taiji (i.e., different mental images used to train the body's expression of intent).
Is it "real," or some kind of subtle tactical use of suggestion with the person demonstrated on . . . along the lines of the made-for-TV hocus-pocus of the discredited Shi Ming featured in the Bill Moyers segment from the early-1990s PBS television series, "Healing and the Mind," where the cavorting contortionist people Shi was waving around were all his students:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzIjUR-mHCY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFijeHmOPlQ
In Beijing I had a chance to watch an 86-year-old gongfu cousin of Wang Yongquan's line in work in a park with wrestlers and other people that he hadn't met before . . . all I can report is that those people left with a lot more dust on their clothes than they had come with. As far as I could tell, there was no previous opportunity to "condition" those people, and they were not students vying for the teacher's favor by out-acting each other to make him look incredible. And it clearly was not due to the teacher's superiority in physical strength or overt physical technique. Yet it didn't appear that any of the teacher's actual students, even ones who had trained with him for twenty years or more, could show anything close to the abilities he apparently demonstrated with the outsiders. If the old teacher's skills were real, he was an outlier.
The best taiji teachers I've encountered in terms of being able to consistently show and explain what they were doing with their own bodies in push-hands or throwing have been from the Chen style. You can feel, hands-on, the chansi jin (silk-reeling) and compression/expansion working in good Chen teachers' bodies when they are demonstrating with another student.
Last edited by Thomas Campbell : 02-13-2010 at 10:19 PM.
|
|
|
|
02-20-2010, 09:26 AM
|
#33
|
Dojo: Tempe Arizona I Liq Chuan
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 145
Offline
|
Re: Mysteries of tai chi
i actually know michael phillips a bit. from what i understand he grew up on the mean streets of NYC and learned his stuff from a lot of shady characters in chinatown and really used his stuff for fighting.
by the time i met him he was already in his 60's and had suffered a serious back injury in a fall from a horse, so i never got to play any kinds of hands on stuff with him (he no longer teaches taiji at all, just qigong).
fwiw, there's more than one kind of ja jing. it depends on the effect you're after. chen guys use a lot more long, striking type fajin and say, southern mantis, uses more short fa jing, which is often used for say, snapping a wrist. in order to do that you need to lock the opponents structure, which when applied more gently can result in a bouncing out type of effect on a training partner, but it's not the point necessarily.
|
tiger at the gate
-----------------------
discipline, concentration & wisdom
Twitter-@luoyegongfu
|
|
|
02-20-2010, 09:33 AM
|
#34
|
Location: Durango, CO
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,123
Offline
|
Re: Mysteries of tai chi
Quote:
Ashe Higgs wrote:
fwiw, there's more than one kind of ja jing. it depends on the effect you're after. chen guys use a lot more long, striking type fajin and say, southern mantis, uses more short fa jing, which is often used for say, snapping a wrist. in order to do that you need to lock the opponents structure, which when applied more gently can result in a bouncing out type of effect on a training partner, but it's not the point necessarily.
|
So how do they work? What's the differences between the two?
I was just in Tempe for a meeting. I forgot you were there.
Mike Sigman
|
|
|
|
02-20-2010, 05:17 PM
|
#35
|
Dojo: Tempe Arizona I Liq Chuan
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 145
Offline
|
Re: Mysteries of tai chi
Quote:
Mike Sigman wrote:
What's the differences between the two?
|
striking doesn't require a point of contact or any skill on touch. it's striking skill.
Quote:
Mike Sigman wrote:
I was just in Tempe for a meeting. I forgot you were there.
|
it doesn't matter because i wasn't here. i was in New York at a training retreat at my Sifu's with other ILC members.
|
tiger at the gate
-----------------------
discipline, concentration & wisdom
Twitter-@luoyegongfu
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:09 AM.
|
vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
Copyright 1997-2024 AikiWeb and its Authors, All Rights Reserved.
For questions and comments about this website:
Send E-mail
|
|