|
|
Hello and thank you for visiting AikiWeb, the
world's most active online Aikido community! This site is home to
over 22,000 aikido practitioners from around the world and covers a
wide range of aikido topics including techniques, philosophy, history,
humor, beginner issues, the marketplace, and more.
If you wish to join in the discussions or use the other advanced
features available, you will need to register first. Registration is
absolutely free and takes only a few minutes to complete so sign up today!
|
11-20-2013, 07:05 AM
|
#51
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 711
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
You seem to be suggesting that basic physics would say you can't unbalance someone bigger than you who's attacking you???? I can assure you that's definitely not the case! In fact it's exactly why some of us find it interesting!
(Also I don't entirely get the point of the analogy, because if someone is an immovable concrete block, I can just walk away and I've won from my point of view. It's kind of a boring situation).
|
|
|
|
11-20-2013, 07:47 AM
|
#52
|
Dojo: Charlotte Aikikai Agatsu Dojo
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,944
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
going to throw in my unsolicited random thoughts.
first, the push model with arms straight out or bend. shoulders are the weakest points for force conduction, so locked you arms straight out, would put stress on the shoulders beyond its physical design. bending arms, especially, the elbows touching the body, would distribute the forces to the body and lessen the stress at the shoulder joints. it's a sound biomechanical/physics model.
there is nothing wrong to go with both theory and applied. one approach is to trying things first then come up with theory to explain/model it. the other approach is to come up with the theory, then experiment to either prove or disprove or improve the theory. some folks like the experiment first; other folks, theory first.
me, i liked to do both, at the same time. left hand for theory, right hand for applied. waving left hand and said watch this hand, then kick with the right foot. oh wait! there supposes to be a throw somewhere in here. hey, if you kick hard enough, the other person might throw up.
last i checked, newtonian physics still applied on earth. i was reminded this morning in the shower, what goes up, must comes down. damn cold water!
|
|
|
|
11-20-2013, 07:58 AM
|
#53
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 406
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
Quote:
Basia Halliop wrote:
You seem to be suggesting that basic physics would say you can't unbalance someone bigger than you who's attacking you???? I can assure you that's definitely not the case! In fact it's exactly why some of us find it interesting!
(Also I don't entirely get the point of the analogy, because if someone is an immovable concrete block, I can just walk away and I've won from my point of view. It's kind of a boring situation).
|
I don't mean to imply that it was somehow a prescriptive method of unbalancing, rather to illustrate power differences can matter, that these power differences can be created because you have put in a lot of time solo training that someone else has not (using methods requiring little to no scientific literacy), and that pretty much all of us are starting off severely unbalanced to begin with.
So, learning first and foremost how to unbalance someone can seem rather backwards from that point of view. Learning how to not be a walking collection of imbalances can seemingly undo/invalidate many years/decades of the most well-intentioned and earnest training of most of us, because all someone has to do to point out our flaws is to come in contact with us. There really are dragons out there.
Last edited by Lee Salzman : 11-20-2013 at 08:07 AM.
|
|
|
|
11-20-2013, 08:33 AM
|
#54
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 711
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
To me learning not to get hurt (punched hard or arm broken or grabbed and dragged somewhere) seems like step one. No amount of training will make me immune to a single hard strike from someone 1.5 times my weight and a foot taller than me, so not getting hit seems like first priority.
Both unbalancing others and not letting them unbalance you seem like they should come lower down than that.
Thanks for explaining, though, I do agree that many of us are often very unbalanced.
Last edited by Basia Halliop : 11-20-2013 at 08:40 AM.
|
|
|
|
11-20-2013, 08:45 AM
|
#55
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,248
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
Quote:
Basia Halliop wrote:
To me learning not to get hurt (punched hard or arm broken or grabbed and dragged somewhere) seems like step one. No amount of training will make me immune to a single hard strike from someone 1.5 times my weight and a foot taller than me, so not getting hit seems like first priority.
|
Then you need something like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54g2op_Ts2I
|
|
|
|
11-20-2013, 09:19 AM
|
#56
|
Dojo: Sakumeikan N.E. Aikkai .Newcastle upon Tyne.
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,266
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
Quote:
Bill Danosky wrote:
If anybody expresses doubt to me about Kamae, I generally go into a wrestler's crouch and show how similar it is. Shinzentai and Kamae are not that different, either. But many other Aikido styles don't use it, so YMMV.
|
Dear Bill,
Wrestlers crouch is more akin to jigotai, not shizentai.From my experience Jigotai is not applicable on Aikido.Of course some Judo masters like Kenshiro Abbe did not advocate this posture.Jigotai may well have been stolen from Sumo?? Cheers, Joe.
|
|
|
|
11-20-2013, 09:24 AM
|
#57
|
Location: Massachusetts
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,202
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
Quote:
Demetrio Cereijo wrote:
|
I want a hakama with that kind of ki power.
|
|
|
|
11-20-2013, 09:27 AM
|
#58
|
Location: Edmonton, AB
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 802
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
Quote:
Demetrio Cereijo wrote:
|
Amazing… Even more amazing - someone actually filmed it, AND posted it for the world to see…
|
|
|
|
11-20-2013, 10:22 AM
|
#59
|
Location: Left Coast
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 4,339
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
Quote:
Demetrio Cereijo wrote:
|
[facepalm]...
|
Janet Rosen
http://www.zanshinart.com
"peace will enter when hate is gone"--percy mayfield
|
|
|
11-20-2013, 11:10 AM
|
#60
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 711
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
Yes, thanks! That's perfect, just what I need.
|
|
|
|
11-20-2013, 11:19 AM
|
#61
|
Dojo: Aikido South
Location: Johnson City, TN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,209
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
Quote:
Lee Salzman wrote:
I don't mean to imply that it was somehow a prescriptive method of unbalancing, rather to illustrate power differences can matter, that these power differences can be created because you have put in a lot of time solo training that someone else has not (using methods requiring little to no scientific literacy), and that pretty much all of us are starting off severely unbalanced to begin with.
So, learning first and foremost how to unbalance someone can seem rather backwards from that point of view. Learning how to not be a walking collection of imbalances can seemingly undo/invalidate many years/decades of the most well-intentioned and earnest training of most of us, because all someone has to do to point out our flaws is to come in contact with us. There really are dragons out there.
|
Dammit. Yes. One of the reasons why I am waiting to be sold on a new teaching methodology with this stuff is for this reason... Ultimately, we are teaching people how to unbalance their partners and hoping they are athletic enough to not to be [too] unbalanced themselves in the process. Through the learning process, we correct and encourage self-evaluation and hope our students realize they are also unbalanced and consideration self-correctional behavior to be part of their instruction. Both instructional formats hoping that our students we'll get the message and become receptive to that conversation that eventually comes up... "don't try to do anything to your partner." "What? 5 years you've been showing me kata where I am instructed to do something, now you're telling me not to? F^*k this, I'm doing tai bo."
The converse of that conversation is this one... "Hi, welcome to aikido. You have terrible posture and you're one step above sloppily hurling your body in a general direction as your primary method of locomotion. For the next 5 years, we're going to concentrate on your problem areas, which seem to involve 'being'."
|
Jon Reading
|
|
|
11-20-2013, 11:36 AM
|
#62
|
Dojo: Charlotte Aikikai Agatsu Dojo
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,944
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
Quote:
Jon Reading wrote:
"don't try to do anything to your partner." "What? 5 years you've been showing me kata where I am instructed to do something, now you're telling me not to? F^*k this, I'm doing tai bo."
|
don't knock taibo. i was taking taibo some years ago, and the class were full with older ladies, i.e. much older than i was, and they kicked my ass. i was sucking wind after 10 min. they kept on going like energizer buny.
Quote:
The converse of that conversation is this one... "Hi, welcome to aikido. You have terrible posture and you're one step above sloppily hurling your body in a general direction as your primary method of locomotion. For the next 5 years, we're going to concentrate on your problem areas, which seem to involve 'being'."
|
but standing around not doing much isn't sexy. you need skirts swirling, bodies flying, ki force extending, where men can be men, and women can be men, and men can be women, and dogs can be cats, and we all can hold hands singing kumbaya.
have any of you folks tip over cows before?
|
|
|
|
11-20-2013, 11:41 AM
|
#63
|
Location: ATL
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 847
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
Quote:
Jon Reading wrote:
Dammit. Yes. One of the reasons why I am waiting to be sold on a new teaching methodology with this stuff is for this reason... Ultimately, we are teaching people how to unbalance their partners and hoping they are athletic enough to not to be [too] unbalanced themselves in the process. Through the learning process, we correct and encourage self-evaluation and hope our students realize they are also unbalanced and consideration self-correctional behavior to be part of their instruction. Both instructional formats hoping that our students we'll get the message and become receptive to that conversation that eventually comes up... "don't try to do anything to your partner." "What? 5 years you've been showing me kata where I am instructed to do something, now you're telling me not to? F^*k this, I'm doing tai bo."
The converse of that conversation is this one... "Hi, welcome to aikido. You have terrible posture and you're one step above sloppily hurling your body in a general direction as your primary method of locomotion. For the next 5 years, we're going to concentrate on your problem areas, which seem to involve 'being'."
|
What if the new teaching methodology, the only one that really works for it, is to simply not teach them any ai-ki-do for the first six months or more and make them focus on retaining their balance and dealing with forces acting against it? It may well be the only way to see any appreciable change. Is anyone that wants aikido going to buy that?
|
|
|
|
11-20-2013, 12:26 PM
|
#64
|
Dojo: Wherever I am.
Location: New Zealand
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,013
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
Quote:
Demetrio Cereijo wrote:
|
That vid just made my day
|
|
|
|
11-20-2013, 02:57 PM
|
#65
|
Dojo: Wherever I am.
Location: New Zealand
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,013
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
Here's another one - I tried to hit him myself through the screen and fell off my chair. Bust my side open - now, I'm in stitches.
Go on - try it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qb8hkTCDCn0
|
|
|
|
11-20-2013, 03:11 PM
|
#66
|
Location: Massachusetts
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,202
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
Hey, I see a new moneymaker: "The Ki Hakama!" Janet? You in?
|
|
|
|
11-20-2013, 03:57 PM
|
#67
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 406
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
Quote:
Demetrio Cereijo wrote:
|
Now, if you think empty force gimmicks can be equated with, say...
this
or this
or this
... then you may be in the wrong forum discussing the wrong art.
|
|
|
|
11-20-2013, 04:56 PM
|
#68
|
Dojo: Berkshire Hills Aikido
Location: Massachusetts
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 824
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
It's not Aikido, but it sure is an example of biomechanics in action.
|
|
|
|
11-20-2013, 05:17 PM
|
#69
|
Location: Left Coast
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 4,339
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
Quote:
Mary Malmros wrote:
Hey, I see a new moneymaker: "The Ki Hakama!" Janet? You in?
|
I'd be too tempted to insert a water pistol or air horn or something
|
Janet Rosen
http://www.zanshinart.com
"peace will enter when hate is gone"--percy mayfield
|
|
|
11-20-2013, 05:23 PM
|
#70
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,248
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
Quote:
Lee Salzman wrote:
Now, if you think empty force gimmicks can be equated with, say...
(Shioda gozo clips)
... then you may be in the wrong forum discussing the wrong art.
|
Shioda is always a pleasure to watch, i.e. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fb2cZmMtMC8
But wondering ... discussing Hirosawa Shihan waza here would be a case of wrong forum wrong art too?
|
|
|
|
11-20-2013, 05:39 PM
|
#71
|
Dojo: Sakumeikan N.E. Aikkai .Newcastle upon Tyne.
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,266
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
Quote:
Walter Martindale wrote:
Amazing… Even more amazing - someone actually filmed it, AND posted it for the world to see…
|
Dear Walter,
This is grim stuff.No wonder Aikido gets a bad name when this junk is put on the net. Absolute tosh.Cheers, Joe.
|
|
|
|
11-21-2013, 02:04 AM
|
#72
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 406
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
Quote:
Demetrio Cereijo wrote:
|
To be absolutely direct and clear, I do not believe empty force is in any way what O'Sensei was doing, and people who peddle it - regardless of what they claim to be doing - are at best charlatans, and at worst actually believe in it themselves. That does not mean you can't cause an opponent to react before contact based on what you do, but there are sane limits to this and empty force sorts of things (endemic unfortunately to most of the ki/chi arts) are definitely outside of those sane limits. I interpreted your posting of the original link to it as some sort of unfortunate (mis-)interpretation of what I was saying earlier.
The reason I posted those Shioda videos is because he illustrated the point I was trying to make earlier, that there is an underlying quality to what he is doing that goes hidden in the techniques, but is visible (and unfortunately a bit too palpable to the uke in the last one) in those particular choice moments. Without that quality, he may as well just be flapping his arms around and people in an effort to reproduce it come up with stuff like, uh, empty force as some sort of misguided interpretation of what he was doing. There is a difference between an uke trying to get out of the way of what he knows to be truly an oncoming freight train vs. collusive movement designed to make a paper tiger look better.
|
|
|
|
11-21-2013, 05:15 AM
|
#73
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,248
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
Quote:
Lee Salzman wrote:
To be absolutely direct and clear, I do not believe empty force is in any way what O'Sensei was doing
|
That's fine with me, even if Ueshiba sometimes did this kind of 'tricks'. Others may believe he was channeling kami, some believe he was a mentalist... there is a lot of different beliefs about what O Sensei was into.
Quote:
I interpreted your posting of the original link to it as some sort of unfortunate (mis-)interpretation of what I was saying earlier.
|
I was addressing (in jest) Basia's post where she said 'not getting hit seems like first priority'.
|
|
|
|
11-21-2013, 07:34 AM
|
#74
|
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 64
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
Quote:
Joe Curran wrote:
Dear Bill,
Wrestlers crouch is more akin to jigotai, not shizentai.From my experience Jigotai is not applicable on Aikido.
|
Hi Joe
How do you pull off shihonage on someone much shorter than you without a nice deep jigotai or switching to suwari waza? My wife and I have a 16" height difference so I get stuck with this a lot
Cheers
Paul
|
|
|
|
11-21-2013, 07:47 AM
|
#75
|
Dojo: Charlotte Aikikai Agatsu Dojo
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,944
Offline
|
Re: Biomechanics of simple throwing
Quote:
Paul Funnell wrote:
How do you pull off shihonage on someone much shorter than you without a nice deep jigotai or switching to suwari waza? My wife and I have a 16" height difference so I get stuck with this a lot
Paul
|
i saw Ellis Amdur put on a shihonage to an very short uke, much shorter than him. i thought Ellis would need to get down on his stomach to do it, but he just did it. it was the smoothest shihonage that i had seen. most folks do shihonage with uke's arm stretch out or up or side way or in every direction, but Ellis's approach is like getting uke to do an arm curl. doesn't raise uke's alarm until the very end. there is also a spanking waza for stiffed back uke.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:22 AM.
|
vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
Copyright 1997-2024 AikiWeb and its Authors, All Rights Reserved.
For questions and comments about this website:
Send E-mail
|
|