|
|
Hello and thank you for visiting AikiWeb, the
world's most active online Aikido community! This site is home to
over 22,000 aikido practitioners from around the world and covers a
wide range of aikido topics including techniques, philosophy, history,
humor, beginner issues, the marketplace, and more.
If you wish to join in the discussions or use the other advanced
features available, you will need to register first. Registration is
absolutely free and takes only a few minutes to complete so sign up today!
|
08-04-2011, 08:44 PM
|
#1
|
Location: Durango, CO
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,123
Offline
|
"Internal Strength" versus Aikido Speak
Just as an observation: A lot of the talk about "Internal Strength" and "Aiki", etc., appears sort of new and exotic to a lot of Aikidoists, but I noticed in "This is Aikido" and other early publications, there was a lot of discussion about "ki strength", "kokyu", and so on. They were talking about the same thing.
In a lot of Asian martial arts it's been my experience that many westerners get confused by what appears to be different terms and think therefore it must be different topics. In many cases, as Shioda noted, they're talking about the same thing but with "different names". And often, when done correctly, there appears to be very different training methodologies when in fact all that is often seen (in correct training) is simply a different attempt to explain the same physical principle. What goes wrong is when someone grabs the buzzwords and attaches their own meaning to it; hence my caveat about 'when done correctly' (not to be confused with 'when done strongly enough to kick your butt', which is what basically hamstrung much of American and European Taiji).
FWIW
Mike Sigman
|
|
|
|
08-05-2011, 10:56 PM
|
#2
|
Dojo: Tsubaki Kannagara Jinja Aikidojo; Himeji Shodokan Dojo
Location: Renton
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,276
Offline
|
Re: "Internal Strength" versus Aikido Speak
Quote:
Mike Sigman wrote:
Just as an observation: A lot of the talk about "Internal Strength" and "Aiki", etc., appears sort of new and exotic to a lot of Aikidoists, but I noticed in "This is Aikido" and other early publications, there was a lot of discussion about "ki strength", "kokyu", and so on. They were talking about the same thing.
In a lot of Asian martial arts it's been my experience that many westerners get confused by what appears to be different terms and think therefore it must be different topics. In many cases, as Shioda noted, they're talking about the same thing but with "different names". And often, when done correctly, there appears to be very different training methodologies when in fact all that is often seen (in correct training) is simply a different attempt to explain the same physical principle. What goes wrong is when someone grabs the buzzwords and attaches their own meaning to it; hence my caveat about 'when done correctly' (not to be confused with 'when done strongly enough to kick your butt', which is what basically hamstrung much of American and European Taiji).
FWIW
Mike Sigman
|
Therein lies the difficulty of describing the objective reality from our subjective perspective. Add to that the fact (I believe) that many (if not most) people take language for granted and it's no wonder we must sift through a huge pile of...er... hay, to find those valuable needles.
The problem with buzzwords is intrinsic to the problem of learning: how can one help but apply their own meaning (i.e. understanding)? The problem isn't that so much as the disregard for new information; the assumption that, "oh I got it now." The answer, as I see it, is Beginner Mind...or, put in more traditional terms, humility. On a side note this reminds me of a study I recently heard about in which Americans fell short in every aptitude (relatively speaking) except in self-confidence...which doesn't bode well for telling me and my fellow countrymen we're lacking in some way.
...and now to put my rose-colored glasses back on and feed the baby!
Take care,
Matt
|
Gambarimashyo!
|
|
|
08-06-2011, 10:30 AM
|
#3
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,415
Offline
|
Re: "Internal Strength" versus Aikido Speak
Quote:
Mike Sigman wrote:
Just as an observation: A lot of the talk about "Internal Strength" and "Aiki", etc., appears sort of new and exotic to a lot of Aikidoists, but I noticed in "This is Aikido" and other early publications, there was a lot of discussion about "ki strength", "kokyu", and so on. They were talking about the same thing.
In a lot of Asian martial arts it's been my experience that many westerners get confused by what appears to be different terms and think therefore it must be different topics. In many cases, as Shioda noted, they're talking about the same thing but with "different names". And often, when done correctly, there appears to be very different training methodologies when in fact all that is often seen (in correct training) is simply a different attempt to explain the same physical principle. What goes wrong is when someone grabs the buzzwords and attaches their own meaning to it; hence my caveat about 'when done correctly' (not to be confused with 'when done strongly enough to kick your butt', which is what basically hamstrung much of American and European Taiji).
FWIW
Mike Sigman
|
Such is the case in all endeavors in life and the largest impediment
in communications between people.
dps
|
Go ahead, tread on me.
|
|
|
08-06-2011, 12:27 PM
|
#4
|
Dojo: West Wind Dojo Santa Monica California
Location: Malibu, California
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,295
Offline
|
Re: "Internal Strength" versus Aikido Speak
Good Ol' Pathos,Ethos, and Logos...befuddling folks "explanations" since the dawn of civilization...
William Hazen
|
|
|
|
08-07-2011, 11:36 AM
|
#5
|
Dojo: Big Green Drum (W. Florida Aikikai)
Location: West Florida
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,619
Offline
|
Re: "Internal Strength" versus Aikido Speak
Quote:
William Hazen wrote:
Good Ol' Pathos,Ethos, and Logos...befuddling folks "explanations" since the dawn of civilization...
William Hazen
|
No, no no, ... it was Porthos, Athos and Aramis ...
Sheesh.
|
Cordially,
Erick Mead
一隻狗可久里馬房但他也不是馬的.
|
|
|
08-07-2011, 11:48 AM
|
#6
|
Dojo: West Wind Dojo Santa Monica California
Location: Malibu, California
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,295
Offline
|
Re: "Internal Strength" versus Aikido Speak
Quote:
Erick Mead wrote:
No, no no, ... it was Porthos, Athos and Aramis ...
Sheesh.
|
LOL.
|
|
|
|
08-07-2011, 12:01 PM
|
#7
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,415
Offline
|
Re: "Internal Strength" versus Aikido Speak
Quote:
Erick Mead wrote:
No, no no, ... it was Porthos, Athos and Aramis ...
Sheesh.
|
http://memory-alpha.org/wiki/Porthos
dps
|
Go ahead, tread on me.
|
|
|
08-07-2011, 12:27 PM
|
#8
|
Dojo: Tsubaki Kannagara Jinja Aikidojo; Himeji Shodokan Dojo
Location: Renton
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,276
Offline
|
Re: "Internal Strength" versus Aikido Speak
Quote:
Erick Mead wrote:
No, no no, ... it was Porthos, Athos and Aramis ...
Sheesh.
|
Great minds think alike! I almost wrote the same thing (reading the series right now).
|
Gambarimashyo!
|
|
|
08-08-2011, 07:03 AM
|
#9
|
Dojo: Aunkai
Location: Fairfax, VA
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 429
Offline
|
Re: "Internal Strength" versus Aikido Speak
This sounds like a great opportunity to define Internal Strength terms in aiki speak and vice versa. Would be a great opportunity to have a reference post or "sticky thread".
|
|
|
|
08-08-2011, 09:09 AM
|
#10
|
Location: Durango, CO
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,123
Offline
|
Re: "Internal Strength" versus Aikido Speak
Quote:
Hunter Lonsberry wrote:
This sounds like a great opportunity to define Internal Strength terms in aiki speak and vice versa. Would be a great opportunity to have a reference post or "sticky thread".
|
As I've noted elsewhere, the term "internal strength" comes almost directly from "neijin". Of course there are numerous ways to train "internally", hence a term like "Neigong" ("internal exercise"). But neigongs are really a subset of "qigongs" ("qi-developing exercises"), which you'll hear sometimes in Japanese as "Kiko".
"Kokyu" seems to be a more widely used term than just in Aikido because there are a few different other Japanese styles now offering videos on "Kokyu" and it seems doubtful that a number of unrelated styles got their information from Ueshiba, Takeda, etc. Ushiro Sensei seemed to use the term "Kokyu" often in as general a way as "Aiki" is being used by some people today.
BTW, internal strength is shown/demonstrated in a number of generally accepted ways in China. I listed them at least twice in posts in the past.
2 cents.
Mike Sigman
|
|
|
|
08-10-2011, 10:44 AM
|
#11
|
Dojo: Philadelphia Ki-Aikido / New Jersey Ki Society
Location: Philadelphia/PA
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 56
Offline
|
Re: "Internal Strength" versus Aikido Speak
Quote:
Mike Sigman wrote:
Just as an observation: A lot of the talk about "Internal Strength" and "Aiki", etc., appears sort of new and exotic to a lot of Aikidoists, but I noticed in "This is Aikido" and other early publications, there was a lot of discussion about "ki strength", "kokyu", and so on. They were talking about the same thing.
|
Good post, Mike. It's easy to tell that you're always thinking and studying with a humble heart. The more I studied Ki, the more I found that they were talking about the same thing.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:01 AM.
|
vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
Copyright 1997-2024 AikiWeb and its Authors, All Rights Reserved.
For questions and comments about this website:
Send E-mail
|
|