Clarity and Self-Delusion in One's Training by George S. Ledyard
[Discuss this article (65 replies)]
[Download this article in PDF format]
I remember reading a description of Aikido by Rev. Kensho Furuya in
which he described the art as a tree. The majority of the students
were the leaves; they came and then fell away but were collectively
crucial to the survival of the tree itself. Then there was the trunk
represented by the core long-time students. They are the bulk of what
makes Aikido vibrant. They are there, year in and year out. They are
the primary support for any dojo, both financially and
energetically. They train as much as they can or as much as they are
willing. Aikido is important to them but for most it is not the
primary focus of their lives. For any tree to survive for the long
run, it must have roots that go deep. The roots represent those
students who strive for "mastery" of the art, who wish to go as deep
in their training as they can, for whom Aikido is one of the most
important things in their lives.
Are you a leaf, part of the trunk, or are you striving to go deep and
become part of the root system? Why do you need to decide? Because one
needs to be absolutely clear that the decisions one makes about one's
training determine this outcome and yet often, people simply drift
into a pattern that is at odds with how they see themselves. Of course
no one wants to be a "slacker" but it's very common to see a dojo in
which the standard of training is not very high with senior students
who imagine themselves to be quite something in the scheme of
things. On order to maintain this illusion the people at this dojo
tend not to train elsewhere, see other teachers, or be very welcoming
to folks from outside. In those rare circumstances in which they are
presented with alternative ways of doing things, they are apt to
respond "That's ok but it's not what we do...."
One can even see this within one's own dojo... this desire to be
important, to have position. My dojo opened in 1989. I had a core
group of new students who trained very seriously and were getting
ready to take their Shodan exams. As they came along in their training
the original senior students who had helped me open the dojo moved on
to start their own schools pretty much leaving these up and coming
boys as the big kahunas in the dojo. Then I acquired two new
students. One was one of Imaizumi Sensei's students who had moved to
the area to work for Microsoft. The other, while not ranked in Aikido,
had done Judo and Karate since he was a child and was also Japanese
trained. It was immediately clear that these guys were setting a new
standard for the dojo. They trained harder, more intensely, more
frequently and they didn't have to be asked to take responsibilities
around the dojo.
The reaction of the existing seniors was interesting to watch. Within
a fairly short period of time, three out of four of the core group of
up and coming aspirants had stopped training regularly. They didn't
quit, nor did they overtly remove themselves from the test preparation
track, they simply disappeared. It was eminently clear to me that the
arrival of students at the dojo who were more serious than they were
caused a crisis of confidence and they chose, with one exception, not
to deal with it. Eventually, each returned and trained just enough to
get his Black Belt but none has returned to training with the
commitment level he had originally.
Years ago there was a fellow at another dojo at which I taught
regularly. The fellow had been at he school since its inception, had
managed to get his Shodan by virtue of the fact that he had been at
the dojo so long. But when it really came down to it, he didn't really
train. He was always "injured", had a "job related conflict", a
"class" that he was taking, always some reason he couldn't make it to
class that day. I'd come to do a weekend seminar and he'd show up for
the potluck but not be able to make any of the actual classes because
of .... His teacher and I, after many years of observing this pattern,
started to joke that this fellow had been pretending to do Aikido
longer than anyone else we knew.
What was interesting about him was that, if you talked to him, it
would have appeared to you that he was a hardcore Aikido fanatic. He
would bring up his Aikido training in any conversation he had. He had
read every magazine and book (not hard to do in those days), had every
video, knew about the politics of all the various Organizations,
etc. He "talked the talk" but he never "walked the walk" so to speak.
The "disconnect" between how people see themselves and the reality is
fascinating to me. My partner, Genie Rivers, comes out of a western
fencing background. She was a national champion in the veteran's
division and narrowly missed making the Olympic team at one
point. They don't have this problem in fencing quite to this extent
because they have competition. It's very difficult to maintain an
unrealistic assessment of one's own ability when one can't win any
matches.
So what I see in Aikido is often a set of intertwining relationships
within the dojo and within organizations which are largely designed to
support the illusions of the members. A senior teacher will set
himself up as head of a "style" or "organization. He will create a set
of senior students who support him in this position. From the
standpoint of maintaining himself as the "Big Kahuna" it is not in his
interest to encourage his students to get wider exposure to other
teachers and alternative viewpoints. A senior teacher actually
accepted an invitation to the Aiki Expo, an event which is
specifically about sharing and exchange, and told his students not to
train with any of the other teachers. I found that to be both arrogant
and paranoid at the same time.
The senior students of such a teacher derive their self importance
from the relationship which they have with their teacher. It is also
in their interest to support this teacher to the exclusion of others
because in doing so they enhance their own positions. One can be a lot
bigger fish if the pond is smaller so to speak. This allows folks to
narrow the focus of their training to just what their own teacher
does, no matter how limited that might be. They will, of course, turn
around and do the same thing with their own students. They will
maintain their own positions by restricting the exposure their
students get. Guest instructors will be limited to folks who are part
of the intertwining system of mutual support. The students will never
see anyone who has a different approach from their teacher.
But even in a dojo in which the teacher's attitude is not consciously
this way, the students themselves often try to create this safe haven
in which they will feel like they are making genuine progress towards
something, often not defined. Ranking serves to give the students
something tangible to hang their hats on and it also pegs their status
relative to one another in the dojo hierarchy. Nothing upsets this
delicate balance of mutual support like having someone come along who
hasn't bought into the system. In the case of my own dojo, having a
student arrive who, while having no rank whatever in Aikido, was
functioning at a very high level within a short period of
time. Coupled with the fact that this same student was apt to jump
right in when anything needed to be done and the seniors couldn't
handle it. He challenged their view of their position in the hierarchy
and their self images as "serious" students.
The Aikido community is largely a set of interlocking pyramids. The
largest pyramid might have a Founder (a "style"); there may be a
number of Shihan (each head of an organization or network of loyalties
which form the smaller pyramids within the larger "style"); usually
there are many Dojo-cho (each at the top of a small pyramid which is
the school). Ostensibly, the teacher at the top of the largest pyramid
represents the model to which the folks in the various smaller
pyramids aspire. But, in fact, one often sees a "disconnect" between
the manner in which people train and the manner their teachers trained
in order to reach the skill level they have attained.
I often hear people advise students not to worry about setting goals,
not to compare themselves to anyone else, just to train day by day
with good commitment and everything will take care of itself. I
couldn't disagree more strongly! If one has any aspirations to attain
a certain level of skill in an art like Aikido one must make sure that
the training one is receiving and the effort one is putting in will
lead one eventually to that level of skill. Each point on a pyramid
represents a pinnacle of sorts. If one does not aspire to reach that
pinnacle, one will almost certainly not do so. If one's aspirations are
to reach the pinnacle of one of the smaller pyramids, for instance be
as good as the teacher who runs the dojo at which you train, one must
look at the kind of training and the amount of effort he or she put
into their training and use that as a model. I see many teachers who,
perhaps having trained very hard and faced many hardships in their
training, now attempt to shelter their students from having to endure
what they did. There are, more often than not, no students in these
dojos who will become as good as their teachers. If you are a student,
you need to be clear in your mind about where in the nested pyramid
structure you wish to be. Are you content to merely be a part of the
smallest pyramid, the dojo? Is being the senior student of a teacher
running a dojo your goal? Or is merely getting a black belt the extent
of your aspirations?
If you aspire to reach a higher level, for instance attain what one
would describe as Shihan level skill, one had better be very clear
about what that entails. If one's model is at the pinnacle of one of
the smallest pyramids, but one aspires to reach the skill level of
one's teacher's teacher, for instance, one has to become familiar with
how that teacher trained, what level of commitment he had, what
experiences he acquired through his training. If one models one's
training after one's teacher, one will be lucky if he reaches the level
of that teacher and it is extremely unlikely one will surpass that
teacher's skill level. If one's model is O-Sensei or one of the giants
of Aikido who were his direct students, one will not ever reach that
level merely by training sincerely day after day without directing the
type of training towards that specific goal.
This subject comes up all the time on the internet forums... Someone
will write in and say that they wish to do Aikido but there is no one
teaching in their area and how can they train on their own. The answer
is that you can't. You simply can't train on your own and have what
you do be Aikido. If they wish to do Aikido they need to move and find
a teacher, period! Conversely, the student who trains at a small dojo
under the leadership of a teacher of middling rank and experience but
who wishes to reach the level of the great teachers whom he has read
about in the books and seen on the videos, will eventually need to
move on and seek out a dojo which trains in a way that can produce
someone at that level. The exception to this rule would be if one has
been lucky enough to find a teacher whose own aspirations are
high. That teacher has not stopped progressing himself and will be
pulling his serious students along behind him.
Is your teacher a model for you? Doe she or she represent something to
aspire to or are they a form of entertainment for you? If you
genuinely aspire to master what your teacher is attempting to pass on
to you , you need to look at how that teacher reached the level he or
she did and train with that in mind. Don't ever think that merely by
being on the mat with these people, night after night, basking in
their august presence, that you will automatically progress to
anything like the level they have reached. To get to their level you
must make the same kind of commitment they have, search out the same
kind of experience they have had. It's just that simple.
Many people attend class each night and afterwards comment amongst
themselves how "amazing" their teacher is. I'm sure many folks
remember me saying that the real question is "when are you going to
decide to be amazing"? Do you even want to be "amazing"? Its fine if
you don't... just be straight about it. Many teachers, recognizing
that their "Tree of Aikido" needs to have a good solid trunk tend to
reward their students with steady and regular rank promotion simply
because they are there consistently supporting their teacher and the
dojo. This has lead to the oft remarked situation in which Dan rank
doesn't actually have anything to do with actual mastery of
technique. Students attain higher Dan rank and start to feel as if
they have attained something "real". At that point, anything which
calls into question the reality of that "attainment" is a threat both
to the self esteem of the student but the essential harmony of the
relationships within the dojo. If a student enrolls who doesn't
collude in maintaining the illusion that this "senior" is as good as
he thinks he is, often the collective weight of the entire social
nexus of the dojo will be brought to bear to "retool" this new student
to fit into the collective illusions being maintained in that dojo. If
this proves impossible, the student will be forced out by constant
negative feedback, lack of positive reinforcement, disparagement of
the student's previous experience, etc. Once the "trouble maker" is
gone, things can return to their normal state of harmonious balance in
which the collective illusions of the group are maintained.
This past summer I had the chance to train with one of the great
martial arts teachers I have encountered. Kenji Ushiro Sensei was
invited by Saotome and Ikeda Sensei to participate in the Rocky
Mountain Summer Camp as a guest instructor. It was inspiring to see
this man operating at the same high level of skill I am used to from
my own teachers while giving us a very different perspective. Despite
the fact that our own teachers were clearly impressed with his skill
and that he was one of the nicest men you'd ever meet, one of my
teacher acquaintances seemed to be looking for something to
criticize. I realized that Ushiro Sensei was operating on a level
which would require that my acquaintance stretch beyond his comfort
level in order to move his technique to this higher level. Rather than
face the fact that there is a level of technique above his own and
that getting there would require a change in how he trains, it was
more comfortable to manufacture some dissatisfaction which lets him
off the hook. "I didn't like him because..." was the "out", the
justification for not having to hear the message that was
threatening. It was absolutely clear to me that this was what was
going on yet, I am sure that this person thinks of himself as a
serious student of the art, open to new ideas, etc. I think that it is
very important to be vigilant in one's practice and constantly look at
what one is uncomfortable with. Is this thing I am rejecting really
negative or am I making it negative because it makes me uncomfortable?
I think the thing that is most dangerous for us is our tendency to
diminish someone else in order to enhance our own perceptions of
ourselves. This causes us to miss out on all sorts of learning
opportunities. I once asked a friend why she hadn't attended a seminar
with a teacher who I feel is operating at the highest level of
sophistication. She replied that she didn't really "like" the person
in question, that she thought he was strange...
I was stunned as a) if being a bit strange in Aikido was an issue
there'd be about two people you'd ever train with. I mean, regular
people don't do this stuff, and b) since when do we have to "like"
someone in order to learn from them. Once again I realized that, for
this person, the social aspect of training was more important than the
Aikido itself. She wanted to train with someone who was copasetic with
who she is, not someone who would require a shift.
We sabotage our learning in so many ways. One needs to be aware and
pay attention to avoid many of these pitfalls. If one is really
serious about one's progress then one should take experiences as they
present themselves rather than look for ways to shut them out. Being
clear about what one's training goals are is crucial to this
process. Unless you don't care where you end up in your Aikido
training don't expect that merely showing up for class for years on
end will produce mastery. You need to have an idea of how good you
wish to be and create the training which will produce that
result. One's training needs to have direction. One needs a teacher who
can and will train one to the level one wishes to attain. One needs to
make the kind of commitment to training up to that level which
practitioners from earlier generations made to attain that level; less
won't make it. It won't happen just because you hope it will, you have
to make it happen.
[Discuss this article (65 replies)]
[Download this article in PDF format]
|