Welcome to AikiWeb Aikido Information
AikiWeb: The Source for Aikido Information
AikiWeb's principal purpose is to serve the Internet community as a repository and dissemination point for aikido information.

Sections
home
aikido articles
columns

Discussions
forums
aikiblogs

Databases
dojo search
seminars
image gallery
supplies
links directory

Reviews
book reviews
video reviews
dvd reviews
equip. reviews

News
submit
archive

Miscellaneous
newsletter
rss feeds
polls
about

Follow us on



Home > AikiWeb Aikido Forums
Go Back   AikiWeb Aikido Forums > General

Hello and thank you for visiting AikiWeb, the world's most active online Aikido community! This site is home to over 22,000 aikido practitioners from around the world and covers a wide range of aikido topics including techniques, philosophy, history, humor, beginner issues, the marketplace, and more.

If you wish to join in the discussions or use the other advanced features available, you will need to register first. Registration is absolutely free and takes only a few minutes to complete so sign up today!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-08-2007, 03:00 PM   #1
statisticool
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 534
United_States
Offline
Ki/qi & kokyu/jin

http://aikidoonline.com/Archives/200...03_doshu3.html

is an interesting read.

Despite what some theorists claim about ki/qi and kokyu/jin being equal, one reads that:

Quote:
Regarding the relationship between ki and ch'i : They are similar but they're applied differently. The concept of ki is, of course, not limited to Aikido, and many martial art and philosophical systems use the term to express the notion of "universal energy" or "life force." There are many points in common between Aikido and the Chinese martial arts but the respective approach is different, and we should not consider them identical. They should be appreciated as two separate and independent systems.

A secret of internal strength?:
"Let your weight from the crotch area BE in his hands."
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 06:04 PM   #2
Mike Sigman
Location: Durango, CO
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,123
United_States
Offline
Re: Ki/qi & kokyu/jin

Quote:
Justin Smith wrote:
Despite what some theorists claim about ki/qi and kokyu/jin being equal, one reads that:
Oh, Justin.... you just want so desperately for me to be wrong. You just chase me and chase me and just look for anything you can find to support your enormous need for vendetta! Tsk, tsk.

OK.... O-Sensei looked at Ki as deriving from the Japanese Kami and the Universe... but that view of the universe was borrowed from the Chinese. O-Sensei's demo's of Ki were borrowed from the Chinese. Instead of just being negative constantly, why don't you explain how the Ki and Kokyu of O-Sensei was functionally different from the Qi and Jin? Oh, but wait.... you've never provided a single explanation of anything... you just insinuate, right?

And while you're at it... once again I know this is a waste of time to ask for the attribution... give us the quote about kokyu and jin being equal please (whoops... don't scuttle back under your rock before you do it, please).

Regards,

Mike Sigman
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2007, 10:53 PM   #3
Aran Bright
Dojo: Griffith Aikido Yuishinkai
Location: Brisbane
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 115
Australia
Offline
Re: Ki/qi & kokyu/jin

While I don't want to get involved in the debate of whether ki/chi is different or the same, I believe there is great value to be gained by looking at both sides of the coin. This will lead to a greater understanding than that which would be gained if you looked at just one.

http://brisbaneaikido.com

Brisbane Aikido Republic
Brisbane
Australia
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2007, 06:55 AM   #4
Mike Sigman
Location: Durango, CO
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,123
United_States
Offline
Re: Ki/qi & kokyu/jin

Quote:
Aran Bright wrote:
While I don't want to get involved in the debate of whether ki/chi is different or the same, I believe there is great value to be gained by looking at both sides of the coin. This will lead to a greater understanding than that which would be gained if you looked at just one.
Well, it's not really much of a debate. For instance, Koichi Tohei's explanations about Ki could be said to be arguably different from the mainstream "explanation" of qi in China. It's the "explanations" that will vary from place to place, but the functional mechanics do not change. If Tohei stands "immoveably" while someone pushes on his forearm, despite his "explanation" of Ki being different from qi, the functional mechanics (when done correctly and purely) are exactly the same.

Ueshiba argued for the Kami to be the source of ki powers. Tohei argues for the "Ki of the Universe". Some people argue that the qi/ki is mystical or mechanical or "the connective tissue" or whatever, but if you meet enough of these people it's quite easy to see that they're talking about the same thing. I'd be embarrassed to go up to some of the experts I know and try to sell them on the idea that ki and qi, etc., were actually different things.... it would just show them that I didn't know anything, in truth.

FWIW

Mike
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2007, 07:54 AM   #5
Esaemann
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 92
Offline
Re: Ki/qi & kokyu/jin

Always an interesting discussion.
From someone who knows nothing -
I study both Tai Chi (seriously 3 years, started 8 years ago) and Aikido (5 years).
My experience with Aikido is different for one teacher (very aerobically oriented) compared to the head instructor (Sensei) who is more oriented toward relaxation. Sorry, I don't do well with words .. you'd have to experience for yourself if that's not enough.
But every (or most) Tai Chi class is oriented toward relaxation and feeling chi (however you want to define that for yourself) of yourself and partner.
So while O'Sensei's (or other very high level MA) experience with ki/qi/kokyu/jin (or practice) may be the same whether practicing Aikido or Tai Chi, mine is not. And what is most important to me? ... I guess it would have to be my own experience. In Daoism, I've never seen where it says there is an absolute truth (e.g. ki/qi same as kokyu/jin) as compared to .. instead, I mostly see that this study is a personal journey. Does winning an argument, mean that it is true?
My readings of O'Sensei, Bok Nam Park (Bagua practitioner), and Cheng Man Ching (Tai Chi) are very different. They may or may not experience the same thing, but they seem to be getting there in different ways.
Frankly, I don't care to prove scientifically (or if it is proven) that they are the same. Everyone learns differently, and I won't begrudge someone who can learn to calm the mind or "feel chi" through a method different that mine.
My own useless opinion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2007, 08:06 AM   #6
Mike Sigman
Location: Durango, CO
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,123
United_States
Offline
Re: Ki/qi & kokyu/jin

Quote:
Eric Saemann wrote:
My own useless opinion.
Well, I've never seen anyone deflate the motivation for others to debate a point so quickly.

"Both views should be viewed and considered" is not always a true statement, Eric. Quite often, one view is more right and one is more wrong. Functionally, the mechanics for how to do the physical phenomena of ki/qi are straightforward, even if the speech and discussions comes from different perspectives. If someone wants to posit that Ki is different from Qi, they need to say why... not just find posts that agree with their position. If all we can do is post quotes back and forth at each other, we're not qualified to debate a topic.... much less pick a fight over it.

Regards,

Mike Sigman
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2007, 08:37 AM   #7
Esaemann
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 92
Offline
Re: Ki/qi & kokyu/jin

Wyatt, I'm rolling (Tombstone).
Yeah, I started (I know nothing) and ended with that deflation.

I'm not debating the rightness or wrongness of it. It would be like my talking about brain surgery (and I'm not a doctor or surgeon). I guess what I was trying to do is encourage someone, that they don't have to know the right answers, only to practice. This is unusual for me, because my education is engineering and I like to know and understand the right answer. However, with this, I realize that it is better for me to just practice.
I mostly read about these things to see different methods and then I can determine which way is best for me.
Maybe we're just talking about different things here..
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2007, 10:14 AM   #8
statisticool
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 534
United_States
Offline
Re: Ki/qi & kokyu/jin

Quote:
Walter Sigman wrote:
Oh, Justin...
(snipes snipped)
Walter, where was I talking about you?

Quote:
Instead of just being negative constantly, why don't you explain how the Ki and Kokyu of O-Sensei was functionally different from the Qi and Jin?
So you feel that posting a direct quote from the Ueshibas on the topic is being negative.

A secret of internal strength?:
"Let your weight from the crotch area BE in his hands."
  Reply With Quote

Please visit our sponsor:

AikiWeb Sponsored Links - Place your Aikido link here for only $10!



Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:22 PM.



vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2014 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
----------
Copyright 1997-2014 AikiWeb and its Authors, All Rights Reserved.
----------
For questions and comments about this website:
Send E-mail
plainlaid-picaresque outchasing-protistan explicantia-altarage seaford-stellionate