Welcome to AikiWeb Aikido Information
AikiWeb: The Source for Aikido Information
AikiWeb's principal purpose is to serve the Internet community as a repository and dissemination point for aikido information.

Sections
home
aikido articles
columns

Discussions
forums
aikiblogs

Databases
dojo search
seminars
image gallery
supplies
links directory

Reviews
book reviews
video reviews
dvd reviews
equip. reviews

News
submit
archive

Miscellaneous
newsletter
rss feeds
polls
about

Follow us on



Home > AikiWeb Aikido Forums
Go Back   AikiWeb Aikido Forums > Open Discussions

Hello and thank you for visiting AikiWeb, the world's most active online Aikido community! This site is home to over 22,000 aikido practitioners from around the world and covers a wide range of aikido topics including techniques, philosophy, history, humor, beginner issues, the marketplace, and more.

If you wish to join in the discussions or use the other advanced features available, you will need to register first. Registration is absolutely free and takes only a few minutes to complete so sign up today!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-23-2002, 12:42 PM   #26
Neil Mick
Dojo: Aikido of Santa Cruz
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 225
Offline
...and then you have to consider appropriate scale in terms of regulation (see my other post in the "spiritual" section).

The essential nature of an organization changes the larger it gets. A 20-person nonprofit, for instance, could be governed by a form of benign anarchy, where everyone spontanously agrees to new rules whenever a problem comes up.

A 2000-person organization, on the other hand, could not be organized in this matter. As such, the needs of the individual become secondary to the needs of the system running it.

The larger it is, the more abstract the organizational concerns.

In response to your post above, Opher, I'm not sure I agree. Your examples are all clear examples of harm: cigarrette smoke does harm, as well as not educating your kids. Personally I think its more about where the TRUE values lay, in this country.

We invest more in prison (much more expensive) than education because there are ppl who benefit from this investment, namely those in power. Its the same with tobacco: for years we were told that cigarrette smoking was "good for you." Then, even after the Surgeon General warnings on the box, we still have cigarette advertising.

Advertising, BTW, is not unfettered. This too is subject to money'd interests. You don't see too many anti-pollution ads, certainly not in the same volume as car and cigarrette ads.

I agree that the Bill of Rights is a great document, but its purpose has been corrupted by money (take the amendment allowing freedom of speech. It was argued, recently, that secretly filming a moment when a woman in a car accident was begging her attendant to let her die when she discovered that she lost her legs, was freedom of speech. This case went to court and the woman lost. The mainstream press has taken the concept of freedom of speech and twisted it to mean something the Founders never even conceived).
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2002, 05:36 PM   #27
Kevin Leavitt
 
Kevin Leavitt's Avatar
Dojo: Team Combat USA
Location: Olympia, Washington
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,376
United_States
Offline
Yea Opher, you bring up a good point....the motorcycle helmet law is an example of one such law.

simple logic would say that it should be okay to not have a helmet law since the individual is the only one harmed by his action.

But, in reality, I believe statistics would show that the cost to society and families is high in accidents that happen when no helmet is worn.

I look at this as a protective law that would fall under the "harm" category.

Morality laws such as the sunday blue laws or fairly few and far in between in todays society, but they do exist.

I am sure you could argue a valid point drawing a correlation for "harm" on all laws...

But, remember, our society had very convincing arguments for why institutions such as slavery and segregation were actually better for african americans as well!

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2002, 05:38 PM   #28
Kevin Leavitt
 
Kevin Leavitt's Avatar
Dojo: Team Combat USA
Location: Olympia, Washington
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,376
United_States
Offline
Mick,

Couple of thoughts you raised in my mind. Prison are obviously necessary...but the point is to try and do things to keep people out of them to begin with!

Again, we are getting back to one of the principles of aikido that centers around prevention.

I have no solutions right off hand!

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2002, 05:55 PM   #29
virginia_kyu
Dojo: Aikido of Northern Virginia
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 95
Offline
Quote:
So, I, at least, am in favor of attempts to rationally regulate (or give governmental direction to) a wide variety of topics such as health care, education, minimum wage, environmental protection, access to legal representation, and transportation. There are probably more.
Giving the government a wide variety of topics to regulate is exactly what repressive socialism is. Sure many of these things sound great, who doesn't want a healthy environment, good health care, etc. But in reality human beings run these agencies and human beings have agendas and twist and shape these principles is all sorts of ways eventually using the regulations as weapons against politcal rivals or just simply to wield power over the people.

Which brings me full circle to the orginial subject of this thread, "The Misuse of Aikido Philosophy," that many aikidoists use the general philosophy of Aikido, twist it for their own purposes, then try to tell the rest of us that we are being UNAIKI if see politics differently. Or even if we practice the physical aspects of Aikido differently training more for the practical applications.

Many of these same people say that they do not believe in God or religion but seem to have turned their warped version of Aikido into a religion all in itself, and use their dogma to hammer us with their morality.



Last edited by virginia_kyu : 08-23-2002 at 09:21 PM.

-- Michael Neal
-- http://www.theaikidolink.dnsdyn.net/
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2002, 08:54 PM   #30
Kat.C
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 212
Offline
Quote:
Kevin Leavitt wrote:
Mick,

Couple of thoughts you raised in my mind. Prison are obviously necessary...but the point is to try and do things to keep people out of them to begin with!
Don't you think individuals should be responsible for keeping themselves out of jail rather than everyone else?

Kat

I find the aquisition of knowledge to be relatively easy, it is the application that is so difficult.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2002, 11:52 PM   #31
Neil Mick
Dojo: Aikido of Santa Cruz
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 225
Offline
Quote:
Kathryn Cole (Kat.C) wrote:
Don't you think individuals should be responsible for keeping themselves out of jail rather than everyone else?
In a perfect world, yes. Even in an imperfect world, a lot of the time. There are, however, certain indisputable facts:

-The majority of prisoners are African American, even though they do not commit the majority of crimes;

-In my state (CA), prisons are the fastest growing industry in the state. Whole towns have sprung up which use the nearby prison as its major source of income. Worse, in some cases the towns use what influence they can to extend the prison terms, because they get $$ for the inmates staying longer.

-The prison system is no longer about rehabilitation; its about isolation and separation. When a prisoner is released, his options are limited. In many states, he can't vote, he is listed with the local police (depending upon the crime, such as a sexual offender), not to mention his slim chances in finding a job with upward mobility.

-In some states, recent laws take the judicial discretion away from the judges, such as "three strikes," which requires a judge to sentence the maximum, even if the crimes or minor.

If you've done something wrong, you should go to jail, but the details in between are far more complex.

Don't even get me started about the death penalty...
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2002, 02:33 PM   #32
Neil Mick
Dojo: Aikido of Santa Cruz
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 225
Offline
Re: Misuse of Aikido Philosophy

Quote:
Michael Neal (virginia_kyu) wrote:
Is anyone else irritated about how often O'Sensei's philosophy is taken out of context and used to promote political agendas?
I've been avoiding responding to some of Michael's posts because, frankly, he has misinterpreted the intent of much of my response.
Quote:
Michael Neal (virginia_kyu) wrote:
Which brings me full circle to the orginial subject of this thread, "The Misuse of Aikido Philosophy," that many aikidoists use the general philosophy of Aikido, twist it for their own purposes, then try to tell the rest of us that we are being UNAIKI if see politics differently. Or even if we practice the physical aspects of Aikido differently training more for the practical applications.

Many of these same people say that they do not believe in God or religion but seem to have turned their warped version of Aikido into a religion all in itself, and use their dogma to hammer us with their morality.
Now here I am puzzled: nowhere in the forums I've followed have I seen anyone accuse anyone else of being "un-Aiki" for having a different political perspective. In fact, I have said that I welcome your differences, just please support your beliefs with the facts and avoid name-calling.

There are as many reasons for practicing Aikido as there are Aikidoists: if you like Aikido purely for the physical exercise: great! Who is anyone to say why anyone else should engage in a discipline?

If you practice a martial art of harmony and do not believe in the things others do, more power to you! If you do not consider the spiritual underpinnings of Aikido, I might pause to wonder what drives you to pursue it instead of, say, Capoeira, but your choices are your own, your Way is yours and not mine (or anyone else's).

By the same token: who are you to say that there is no correlation between politics and Aikido? Or for that matter: Aikido and pottery, psychology or religion (or anything else)? O Sensei was not a Christian, yet many ppl see a relationship between their religious beliefs and Aikido. I am not a Christian, yet I fully respect their right to their beliefs.

In some of my posts, I have tried to express that its not what you believe, but how you come to that belief and how you support your thoughts.

Name calling and ego-battles are what is un-Aiki, not a diversity of thought or opinion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2002, 09:32 PM   #33
virginia_kyu
Dojo: Aikido of Northern Virginia
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 95
Offline
Thanks for giving me a perfect example:
Quote:
Name calling and ego-battles are what is un-Aiki, not a diversity of thought or opinion.
Neil, I have moved past the previous political discussion and I am attempting to bring this thread back to its original topic.

But you and a couple of others seem to want to keep attempting to capitalize on some sort of perceived "un-Aiki" sin I am guilty of, the calling of Representative Barbara Lee a wacko.

I wish you would get over it. I am entertained by your notion that I am the one here with a delicate ego.

Also, I have no idea how I have misrepresented your response, your response to what?

There is no conflict or anger here, I had a smile on my face when I took issue with Rep. Lee. Why are you all trying to make so much out of this? Why all of the raw emotion?

I think these discussions are great and alot of fun. So do you want to continue to argue over something really meaningless or move forward to more discussions?

Last edited by virginia_kyu : 08-24-2002 at 11:52 PM.

-- Michael Neal
-- http://www.theaikidolink.dnsdyn.net/
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2002, 03:24 AM   #34
Kami
Dojo: ShinToKai DoJo of AiKiDo
Location: Brazil
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 355
Offline
Re: Re: Misuse of Aikido Philosophy

Quote:
Neil Mick wrote:
If you practice a martial art of harmony and do not believe in the things others do, more power to you! If you do not consider the spiritual underpinnings of Aikido, I might pause to wonder what drives you to pursue it instead of, say, Capoeira, but your choices are your own, your Way is yours and not mine (or anyone else's).
KAMI : I would like just to point out that Capoeira is completely linked with the religion of CandomblÚ. The fact that some Capoeira instructors (just like the majority of Aikido instructors) know nothing about that does not mean that Capoeira has not strong spiritual underpinnings.In the same way, Ueshiba Kisshomaru, intent on spreading Aikido to the World, did take out all underpinning of spirituality from Aikido : the shinto rituals, the obligation of Kamidana; the chanting of Norito; etc...To say that Aikido, today, is a spiritual or religious practice is uncorrect. Some teachers may still practice it like that. Not the great majority.

There is even a ritual, in Capoeira, to "shield the body", making it "protected from all harm", through their religious practices.

Some Capoeira fighters are said to be "Sons of CandomblÚ Gods", such as Xang˘ or Ogun and, as such, specially dedicated to that God.

Respectfully

Last edited by Kami : 08-25-2002 at 03:29 AM.

"We are all teachers, and what we teach is what we need to learn, and so we teach it over and over again until we learn it".
Unknown author

Ubaldo Alcantara
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2002, 04:14 PM   #35
guest1234
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 915
Offline
The Nazis as socialists...now I've heard everything

I was disappointed Kevin had to explain the connection between riding a bike and terrorism , but I guess not really surprised.

I think the point is, one particular view or another is not aiki or un-aike [sic], but the ability to see a subject from the others' point of view is what is aiki.

I think it is important to see ourselves as others see us through our words and actions. We have military bases in nineteen countries around the world. How many other countries have bases on our soil? The Cold War is over, the USSR is no longer a threat, we have recognised China's government, and China and Russia have diplomatic and economic relations with North and South Korea; we, on the other hand, have 37K troops on 65.5K acres of South Korea, and have said the reunification of Korea would not be a reason to remove them. 42K of our troops are in Japan, and our bases occupy 20% of Okinawa's prime agricultural real estate. Income from those bases produces only 5% of Okinawa's GDP, or a loss of 15%. Noise and crime from the bases interfere with the main industry of tourism.

We deplore the war crimes of others, yet refuse to agree to any tribunal that may try Americans; we urge the trying of Khmer Rouge, as long as we limit the time of crimes to after our carpet bombing and before we aligned with them to fight the Vietnamese. We deplore (and rightly so) Tianemen Square, but are silent about our actions (or more correctly, inactions) in Cheju and Kwangju.

We set up bases in Turkey to support Iraqi Kurds against Hussein, while selling arms to Turkey to supress their own Kurdish insurgents. Our blockade of Iraq has been partly responsible for an estimated 500K Iraqi civilians in the last decade due to disease, inadequate medical care, and starvation. We've kept 35K troops in Saudi, with the Gulf War finished over a decade ago.

I read two interesting articles in The Stars and Stripes last week: one was about the UK taking an air traffic controller to trial over the midair of two US F15s. There was no report of quibbling: the British found his actions incorrect and he would stand trial. On the next page the USAF was naming a different general to determine whether the F16 pilots involved in the friendly-fire deaths of Canadian troops should go to trial; the general who was originally responsible was quoted as saying shortly after the incident that he couldn't see how we could hold the fighters responsible. Remember the Marine crew who flew too low and too fast, while against the rules were videotaping their unauthorized acrobatics, and cut the cables on the Italian cable cars? They were aquitted, an unfortunate accident.

There are reasons some are willing to die to make their point about our behavior, and until we openly examine those reasons, we are in for a very long fight. If you have lived your life in a camp, watched loved ones die for want of medical care, know there is little hope for education or economic gain, then death in the attempt to change things may not seem pointless.

This is not to say terrorist acts are right, but I am more interested in preventing future ones rather than 'winning' an unending arguement over which bad action led to which bad reaction; to do that I think we need to understand why they occur, and if we are doing something that provokes it, consider modifying our own behavior.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2002, 08:33 PM   #36
virginia_kyu
Dojo: Aikido of Northern Virginia
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 95
Offline
Quote:
Colleen Annes (ca) wrote:
The Nazis as socialists...now I've heard everything
Why can't many of you accept the fact that the Nazis (National Socialist German Workers' party) were socialists? It is historical revisionism to claim otherwise.
Quote:
I think the point is, one particular view or another is not aiki or un-aike [sic], but the ability to see a subject from the others' point of view is what is aiki.
How does seeing things from other people's point of view have anything to do with being aiki or not? This is another perfect example of what I am talking about.
Quote:
I think it is important to see ourselves as others see us through our words and actions. The Cold War is over, the USSR is no longer a threat, we have recognised China's government, and China and Russia have diplomatic and economic relations We have military bases in nineteen countries around the world. How many other countries have bases on our soil? with North and South Korea; we, on the other hand, have 37K troops on 65.5K acres of South Korea, and have said the reunification of Korea would not be a reason to remove them. 42K of our troops are in Japan, and our bases occupy 20% of Okinawa's prime agricultural real estate. Income from those bases produces only 5% of Okinawa's GDP, or a loss of 15%. Noise and crime from the bases interfere with the main industry of tourism.
So what you are saying is that you know that N. Korea and/or China is no threat at all to that region. That somehow the noise and crime from military bases should shame us into abandoning a critically strategic region of the world? North Korea is on our list of terrorist sponsoring nations and China is still very much a threat to the free world. I think it would be nuts to just pick up and leave.
Quote:
We deplore the war crimes of others, yet refuse to agree to any tribunal that may try Americans; we urge the trying of Khmer Rouge, as long as we limit the time of crimes to after our carpet bombing and before we aligned with them to fight the Vietnamese. We deplore (and rightly so) Tianemen Square, but are silent about our actions (or more correctly, inactions) in Cheju and Kwangju.
Wow this sounds like it came right from the mouth of Jane Fonda in the 60's, I am not trying to engage in name calling in saying this, I really think it sounds all too familiar and it best describes my thoughts about your statements. I know the Aiki Police will frown on my comments.

I also think you are distorting history here. The Khmer Rouge did not come to power until 1975 after they defeated the U.S. backed Khmer Republic.
Quote:
We set up bases in Turkey to support Iraqi Kurds against Hussein, while selling arms to Turkey to supress their own Kurdish insurgents. Our blockade of Iraq has been partly responsible for an estimated 500K Iraqi civilians in the last decade due to disease, inadequate medical care, and starvation. We've kept 35K troops in Saudi, with the Gulf War finished over a decade ago.
Iraqi's are dying because of Saddam Hussein, period. My understanding is that Iraq is allowed to sell oil for those very same medical and food supplies, yet instead Saddam channels the funds into rebuilding his army.

We give funds to Turkey because they are our allies.
Quote:
I read two interesting articles in The Stars and Stripes last week: one was about the UK taking an air traffic controller to trial over the midair of two US F15s. There was no report of quibbling: the British found his actions incorrect and he would stand trial. On the next page the USAF was naming a different general to determine whether the F16 pilots involved in the friendly-fire deaths of Canadian troops should go to trial; the general who was originally responsible was quoted as saying shortly after the incident that he couldn't see how we could hold the fighters responsible. Remember the Marine crew who flew too low and too fast, while against the rules were videotaping their unauthorized acrobatics, and cut the cables on the Italian cable cars? They were aquitted, an unfortunate accident.
To get to the bottom of these cases we would have to examine all of the evidence involved in each of them, it may be unfair to tie them all together the way you have here.
Quote:
There are reasons some are willing to die to make their point about our behavior, and until we openly examine those reasons, we are in for a very long fight. If you have lived your life in a camp, watched loved ones die for want of medical care, know there is little hope for education or economic gain, then death in the attempt to change things may not seem pointless.

This is not to say terrorist acts are right, but I am more interested in preventing future ones rather than 'winning' an unending arguement over which bad action led to which bad reaction; to do that I think we need to understand why they occur, and if we are doing something that provokes it, consider modifying our own behavior.
The only behavior the terrorists want us to modify is our support for Israel. I don't think handing Israel over to them is a humanitarian way of solving this problem.

The only way to solve this problem in the most humanitarian way possible is to defeat the terrorist network quickly and decisively.

Last edited by virginia_kyu : 08-26-2002 at 07:54 AM.

-- Michael Neal
-- http://www.theaikidolink.dnsdyn.net/
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2002, 08:06 AM   #37
virginia_kyu
Dojo: Aikido of Northern Virginia
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 95
Offline
Quote:
I still think you have your definition of socialism wrong, but I recognize the underlying point and tend to agree with it. On the other hand, the history of 'unfettered capitalism' is pretty bleak, too, from the sweat shops of the late 18th century to the robber barons of the railroads, unfettered capitalism has inevitably led to slavery in one form or another, as well as to growing disparity between rich and poor up to and including real starvation. It seems to me that the best chance of success is to define pretty clearly what the responsibilities of government really ought to be (health, education, basic welfare, stewardship of the public resources would seem like candidates) and then find a way to set up systems of checks and balances that will prevent the kind of repressive brutality that you are worried about. This is how democracy has worked for us until now (and it is how it is starting to fail now). It is how the bill of rights has protected us. There is now reason it could not work with a few other things, too.
I agree that capitalism has its problems as well, however I think the main thing that has been hurting capitalism is the abuse of it rather than its core principles. I also think however, that politicians often claim there is abuse when there is not in order to excuse more regulations and taxation.

Capitalism works and offers the best opportunities for the greatest amount of people where socialim has failed to accomplish its goals in every instance it has been tried.

-- Michael Neal
-- http://www.theaikidolink.dnsdyn.net/
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2002, 08:33 AM   #38
deepsoup
Dojo: Sheffield Shodokan Dojo
Location: Sheffield, UK
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 524
Offline
Quote:
Colleen Annes (ca) wrote:
I think it is important to see ourselves as others see us through our words and actions.
Colleen, I admire you more and more. Thankyou for your sanity.

Sean

x
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2002, 08:37 AM   #39
opherdonchin
Dojo: Baltimore Aikido
Location: Baltimore
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 586
Offline
Quote:
I agree that capitalism has its problems as well, however I think the main thing that has been hurting capitalism is the abuse of it rather than its core principles.
Wouldn't this apply to socialism as well? I mean, if it weren't for selfish people who abuse the system, almost any system could work quite well. That traditional argument for capitalism over socialism is that the selfish interests of the individual are harnassed for the public good in capitalism, but are stifled in socialism leading, ultimately, to economic collapse.

Capitalism has consistently failed to better the conditions of any but a very, very small minority of the population whenever it was tried in any seriousness. No country in the world really institutes a true capitalist system because they don't really work. The U.S. is the only country that even subscribes in any sense to a capitialist ideology, and that is because it became an issue of ideology for many Americans as a result of the Cold War, and not for any realistic understanding of how the different systems work.

Every single succesful state in the world (and throughout history, actually) has assumed responsibility for protection of its poorest and weakest members. Every single succesful state has regulated industries when it seemed to be in the national industry to regulate them. To a large extent, the sucess of a state can be predicted from the thought and centralized planning that go into its transportation system. To a large extent, the success of a state can be predicted from its investment in education.

Ultimately, it is not a question of ideology: the Capitalists against the Socialists. It is a question of pragmatism. How does one build a succesful nation, and what is the appropriate balance of centralized vs. local vs. individualized control? It's hard to imagine that anyone thinks these questions would have easy, one word, answers.
Quote:
Why can't many of you accept the fact that the Nazis (National Socialist German Workers' party) were socialists? It is historical revisionism to claim otherwise.
There are lots of reasons. Their political opposition to the left wing parties (socialist and communist) in Germany would be one. A tendency to define the central issues facing German society (and the world) in racial terms and not in economic terms would be another. I think that the only link that can be made between the National Socialist party of 1920s Germany and Socialism is that the National Socialist party grew out of an authentically left wing party called the German Worker's Party, and that both made an effort to appeal to the lower and lower middle classes. Any other points of ideology, political or economic agenda, or world view seem to me to have nothing in common.

Yours in Aiki
Opher
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2002, 10:32 AM   #40
virginia_kyu
Dojo: Aikido of Northern Virginia
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 95
Offline
Quote:
Capitalism has consistently failed to better the conditions of any but a very, very small minority of the population whenever it was tried in any seriousness
It has been tried in seriousness in the United States and the opposite is true, a very, very small minority of the population is desperately poor.
Quote:
There are lots of reasons. Their political opposition to the left wing parties (socialist and communist) in Germany would be one. A tendency to define the central issues facing German society (and the world) in racial terms and not in economic terms would be another. I think that the only link that can be made between the National Socialist party of 1920s Germany and Socialism is that the National Socialist party grew out of an authentically left wing party called the German Worker's Party, and that both made an effort to appeal to the lower and lower middle classes. Any other points of ideology, political or economic agenda, or world view seem to me to have nothing in common.
Just because the Nazi's were opposed to the Soviet brand of socialism does not mean they were not socialists.

They were both collective societies with state control over everything, the very definition of socialism. The Nazi's thought the Aryan race was superior, and the Soviets thought proletariat was superior. I think their world views and political ideologies were remarkably similar, they just chose to hate different segments of the population.

-- Michael Neal
-- http://www.theaikidolink.dnsdyn.net/
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2002, 10:38 AM   #41
virginia_kyu
Dojo: Aikido of Northern Virginia
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 95
Offline
Anyway I was a little irritated when this thread was moved to the "Chit Chat" forum and now that the forum name was changed to "Non-Aikido Discussions" when many of the threads here are related to Aikido, I am not going to bother posting here anymore.

I hope to see you all on the mat sometime practicing Aikido regardless if we agree on political issues or not.

Take care you guys (& gals) and best wishes.

Last edited by virginia_kyu : 08-26-2002 at 10:51 AM.

-- Michael Neal
-- http://www.theaikidolink.dnsdyn.net/
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2002, 10:48 AM   #42
opherdonchin
Dojo: Baltimore Aikido
Location: Baltimore
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 586
Offline
Quote:
I wrote:
Capitalism has consistently failed to better the conditions of any but a very, very small minority of the population whenever it was tried in any seriousness
Quote:
Michael wrote:
It has been tried in seriousness in the United States and the opposite is true, a very, very small minority of the population is desperately poor.
Unfortunately, poverty in the United States is actually embarassingly high and growing at an alarming rate. When it has been tried in seriousness (efforts by industrialists to break the labor unions around the turn of the century, for instance), it has seriously failed. Currently, we live in a welfare state with a minimum wage, health care for the poor, anti-monopoly laws, subsidies for important national industries, and heavy national involvement in some industries like agriculture, transportation, and the banking industry. Each of these vital socialist aspects of our economy came in response to a failure of a previously capitalist aspect of the system failed disastrously.

Not that I'm a historian, so I will defer to any real historians out there who know better.
Quote:
They were both collective societies with state control over everything, the very definition of socialism.
Actually, the Nazis believed strongly in the sanctity of private property. Nazism and Soviet Communism shared an ideology and that ideology is usually called fascism today. It involves a cult of a supreme leader (Hitler or Stalin) who interprets the will of the people for the greater good. It has, at it's heart, an understanding that dissension from this interpretation of the will of the people is treasonous and necessarily must be met with violence. In this sense Soviet Communism and German Nazism were very similar. Most people (on the right and the left) would agree with that.

However, socialism, as the idea is currently propounded, is an idea completely consistent with democracy and not necessarily incompatible with an economy that is substantially market driven. Moreover, it is the dominant (although losing ground over the last ten years following the Thatcher / Reagan revolution (but gaining ground now as privatization fails in more and more cases) ) model of governments for most of the western democracies, including the united states.

Yours in Aiki
Opher
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2002, 10:50 AM   #43
akiy
 
akiy's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,999
Offline
Hi Michael,

I'm sorry to hear you are leaving. The reason why I moved this thread to this forum was due to its main focus becoming non-aikido related. I hope you will understand my thoughts that non-aikido related threads shouldn't be labeled as such.

Also, please note that most of the threads that are here in the "Non-Aikido Discussions" were started here.

I hope you will reconsider leaving.

Regards,

-- Jun

Please help support AikiWeb -- become an AikiWeb Contributing Member!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2002, 12:33 PM   #44
virginia_kyu
Dojo: Aikido of Northern Virginia
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 95
Offline
The title of this thread is "Misuse of Aikido Philosophy" and I began the thread to talk about it. Others then began throwing in politics etc. and diverted the thread away from its original purpose. I think a more fair resolution would have been to split the thread but I think it would be pointless to do so at this point.

What are we supposed to do if people interupt a discussion in order to insert their politics? After experiencing this on two threads "Peace or Righteousness" and this one I decided it was futile to stay on subject so I decided to engage them.

Don't get me wrong, I love discussing politics but I find it rude how the subjects on these threads were hijacked. Also, I am amused that when I decided to engage these people they immediately became offended and began to blame me for the direction of the conversation.

I just find it unfair that me and others who were interrupted in our discussions should be punished by having our threads removed when we can not control what subject people decide to discuss when posting on the thread.

Can we appeal to you in the future to have posts removed from threads that stray far off course from the original topic?

I think this would be much fairer than punishing everyone on the thread by removing it and placing in an obscure area of the website. I am not saying that people are intentially doing this but it is possible that people could sabatage threads they do not like by deliberatly posting off subject material and in effect shutting down their discussion.

I would love to stay on the AikiWeb forums but I think we need a clear and strong policy regarding this or I think it is pointless in beginning anymore discussions, especially those that deal with potential controversial subjects.

Last edited by virginia_kyu : 08-26-2002 at 12:48 PM.

-- Michael Neal
-- http://www.theaikidolink.dnsdyn.net/
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2002, 12:35 PM   #45
guest1234
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 915
Offline
Michael,

Sorry, but the Khmer Rouge OVERTHREW the Cambodian government in it rise to power in 1975, but it was a movement before 1970, and some Asian political historians feel the bombing of rural Cambodia in the early 1970's (more bombs dropped there by the US than in all of Japan during WWII and killing 3/4 million Cambodians) helped turn Cambodians to their support of Pol Pot, in a similar way that Japanese brutality in China helped drum up popular support for Mao.

I think most men, in the end, have the basic desires of food and safety for themselves and their families. Once you have killed someone's loved ones, it is going to be pretty hard to win them over later. They don't just go and follow some crazed leader for no good reason.

I know you don't see 'aiki' in looking through another's eyes, but I do and there we will have to differ. I think about how I would feel in the place of these others; think about family you might have, how would you feel if a soldier from an occupying force raped your daughter or sister. If you saw your wife die for lack of medical care, your son dispair because he'd never have a chance for education or a job, perhaps never a chance to marry for want of that job?

Sometimes you have to read more than the popular news to find out the history of something. I was stationed in Korea in the early 1980's, and knew that when I went to Kwangju, I was not allowed into town, and it had to do with 'some sort of riot at the university', related as not really anything to do with the US, and that the citizens of Kwangju were just unreasonably hostile to us for no good reason. Imagine my surprise to later find that in 1980 college protestors against a military coup and establishment of martial law (with closing of the universities, the Assembly, and arrest of political opponents) were met by ROK special forces who used bayonets and flamethrowers on them. Citizens councils in the region rebelled, and asked for US embassy intervention. Instead, the US released the ROK troops from the UN Command that would be used to retake the cities, with the numbers of dead reported between 240 and 3000 dead or injured.

Being American, and being patriotic, does not mean complete and utter denial of any wrongdoing on our part. Sometimes people make mistakes, sometimes nations do, but I think the way to deal with mistakes is an honest apology and a look at how to avoid them in the future. I wish I could say that our country has never made a mistake, and always treated other nations fairly, but I do not beleive that has always been the case; I would like it to be so in the future.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2002, 01:17 PM   #46
akiy
 
akiy's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,999
Offline
Quote:
Michael Neal (virginia_kyu) wrote:
Can we appeal to you in the future to have posts removed from threads that stray far off course from the original topic?
I think that's a fair enough request. I've done such in the past with some threads.

The reason why I didn't (haven't) done so with this thread in particular was due to its length -- so many posts!

What I'll do, though, is take a look through this thread to try to find where the thread veered "off-topic" and try to split the thread then. I'll then take the original thread (which was, indeed, quite aikido related) and put it back into the Spiritual section. I know you might think, "too little, too late," but it might enable you to revive the original intent of the thread.

How does that sound?

In any case, I do appeal to everyone here to please take "off-topic" threads to the "Non-Aikido Discussions" form (which I'm thinking of changing to "Open Discsussions"). Thank you...

-- Jun

Please help support AikiWeb -- become an AikiWeb Contributing Member!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2002, 01:26 PM   #47
virginia_kyu
Dojo: Aikido of Northern Virginia
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 95
Offline
That sounds fair and if I happen to be on the receiving end of this, having one of my posts deleted, so be it.


Last edited by virginia_kyu : 08-26-2002 at 01:33 PM.

-- Michael Neal
-- http://www.theaikidolink.dnsdyn.net/
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2002, 01:36 PM   #48
akiy
 
akiy's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,999
Offline
Just to follow-up, I wouldn't be deleting the posts but putting them into another thread...

Thanks for your thoughts.

-- Jun

Please help support AikiWeb -- become an AikiWeb Contributing Member!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2002, 01:48 PM   #49
akiy
 
akiy's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,999
Offline
The thread has been split. The original threas, "Misuse of Aikido Philosophy" is now in the Spiritual section.

-- Jun

Please help support AikiWeb -- become an AikiWeb Contributing Member!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2002, 02:21 PM   #50
virginia_kyu
Dojo: Aikido of Northern Virginia
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 95
Offline
Thanks for your attempt to make sense of this mess of a thread but I think it went off subject way before it went into socialism, Post #23 on the "Misuse of Aikido" thread comes to mind. But I think it splintered in so many directions that it is impossible to make sense of any of it, especially because some mentioned socialism, misuse of aikido, and politics together all in one post.

I think it might be better just to start a new thread and not continue any discussions here.

I am going to start a new thread "World Politics" to continue any discussions here.

Last edited by virginia_kyu : 08-26-2002 at 02:36 PM.

-- Michael Neal
-- http://www.theaikidolink.dnsdyn.net/
  Reply With Quote

Please visit our sponsor:

AikiWeb Sponsored Links - Place your Aikido link here for only $10!



Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:37 AM.



vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2018 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
----------
Copyright 1997-2018 AikiWeb and its Authors, All Rights Reserved.
----------
For questions and comments about this website:
Send E-mail
plainlaid-picaresque outchasing-protistan explicantia-altarage seaford-stellionate