Welcome to AikiWeb Aikido Information
AikiWeb: The Source for Aikido Information
AikiWeb's principal purpose is to serve the Internet community as a repository and dissemination point for aikido information.

Sections
home
aikido articles
columns

Discussions
forums
aikiblogs

Databases
dojo search
seminars
image gallery
supplies
links directory

Reviews
book reviews
video reviews
dvd reviews
equip. reviews

News
submit
archive

Miscellaneous
newsletter
rss feeds
polls
about

Follow us on



Home > AikiWeb Aikido Forums
Go Back   AikiWeb Aikido Forums > General

Hello and thank you for visiting AikiWeb, the world's most active online Aikido community! This site is home to over 22,000 aikido practitioners from around the world and covers a wide range of aikido topics including techniques, philosophy, history, humor, beginner issues, the marketplace, and more.

If you wish to join in the discussions or use the other advanced features available, you will need to register first. Registration is absolutely free and takes only a few minutes to complete so sign up today!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-18-2009, 12:16 PM   #1
Dan Richards
Dojo: Latham Eclectic
Location: NY
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 452
United_States
Offline
Moving beyond traditional/classic training classes and methods

In most aikido dojos and seminars I've attended, I've found the instruction, and even sequence of it, to be mostly the same. First the class "warms up," and then the remainder of the time is spent on the sensei first demonstrating a technique, and then the students repeating the technique in pair or groups while the sensei goes around and makes corrections.

Admittedly, I certainly haven't been in every dojo in the world, and the ones I have have been mostly Aikikai and Ki Aikido.

I've found over the last few years I've been teaching that my classes have been breaking away from the "institutional" way I've found many dojos conducting classes, and moving in a much more free-form direction. Still keeping with tradition, but adding a more "stream-of-consciousness" approach as well.

We do, of course, begin and end the classes with the formal bowing. But other than that, what makes up any lesson can be wide and varied. Sometimes we do the set of warm-ups in the beginning, sometimes we don't. Even Tohei has said that "warming up" should not be necessary - we should b ready at all times.

I find I tend to want to instruct in a much more circular and spiral fashion, in addition to linear. I also do not plan lessons. The class arises out of those who are in attendance on any particular day. Some classes just follow our classical syllabus - other classes may concentrate on particular areas - such as one-point, grounding, attacks, etc.. I tend more to have a common, reoccurring "theme" in a class. I also often start students out on a movement/technique by having them work individually - similar to the way karate/iaido kata is performed. I do this, I feel, to better allow students to concentrate on the ever-so-crucial initial opening of the footwork, body and hand positions. Then we move on to partner work.

We have not gotten away from the classical forms. In fact, they are very much incorporated. But we also have more of a Bruce Lee-type JDK approach to training and introducing the myriad of concepts which make up the very core of aikido training.

I have also not found, in my 20+ years of training, any difference between "basic" techniques and concepts and "advanced." In fact, I've found what is often considered "basic" - such as rolling - to actually be "advanced." The "basic" techniques and concepts are actually the most advanced. If a student asks to study something more advanced, I might tell them to work on executing a perfect roll - not on the mat, but out on the sidewalk or some other less forgiving surface.

I've found there is no such thing as a "basic" technique. There are only "core" techniques which can be understood and executed by any given student to varying degrees of proficiency. For example, an "advanced" form of rolling might be a breakfall on a concrete surface. An advanced form of centering/one point/structural alignment might be being able to off-balance and put uke on the ground - and pin them - with one finger.

I'm interested in having a discussion here with teachers and students who have found other methods and explorations of instruction and experimenting that, while not eschewing classic structure and methods, have found other ways of moving beyond to instruct and explore aikido in way that is ever-evolving and more reflective our current timeline in modern, post-millennial society.

I'd appreciate anything anyone has to share.

Last edited by Dan Richards : 09-18-2009 at 12:30 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2009, 10:31 PM   #2
Abasan
Dojo: Aiki Shoshinkan, Aiki Kenkyukai
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 813
Malaysia
Offline
Re: Moving beyond traditional/classic training classes and methods

Every once in a while I'll like to get help from non aikido guys to try out certain principles. We don't fight but I get a more independent reaction from them. Most times Uke has been taught to move a certain way or they mimic the stereotypical uke so much so that we believe everybody would move that way.

I tried to incorporate something like sticky hands in our training sometimes but with the emphasis on center to center connection and feeling out for opponents extension or lack thereof. Then to take advantage of that and control uke, all with one hand in kamae position. But my sensei said that that exercise may lead to a competitive mindset. I agree to a certain extent... but I also think we're all not perfect.

We don't do warm ups now... we just do ki breathing. Like you said, we have to be ready at all times. But looking back, Osensei does some warm ups in his class. Especially aiki taiso. So I do have that also occasionally.

We work from class to class like a thread. But I don't think the students get it since they only come twice a week. So maybe just going with the flow may work out. But I've seen it in a dojo where training went straight into waza with very sporadic and rare interjections on principles. Those students practiced for months and were clueless. I got better structure from a shin shin toitsu dojo. And its great the way they split the class between aiki taiso and aiki waza.

One thing I would like to do will be to incorporate board breaking sessions using aikido strikes. We had an informal one the other day when I showed them the difference between normal and wavelike punch for tsuki. No one really believes in the power of a soft punch until they see something breaks. As it is, their strikes are very robotic and functionless. I want to see it developed into something martially applicable and the rote 'do it in a sincere manner to uke' isn't doing it justice.

I think by far the best tool we used for training is the sword cutting prior to tachi waza and then maintaining a ghost image of the sword throughout the class.

Draw strength from stillness. Learn to act without acting. And never underestimate a samurai cat.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 12:32 PM   #3
Dan Richards
Dojo: Latham Eclectic
Location: NY
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 452
United_States
Offline
Re: Moving beyond traditional/classic training classes and methods

Thanks for your input, Ahmad.

I was just reading an interview with Shoji Nishio Sensei, and these thoughts by Nishio and the founder echo moving forward through innovation and discovery, rather than moving backwards by imitation and holding on blindly to what we perceive as "tradition."

Quote:
They say that O-Sensei practiced the sword and staff, but he did so in the process of giving birth to modern Aikido. Even though we imitate him we will not be able to go beyond what he did. O-Sensei used to tell us, "This old man reached this stage, you should surpass me building on what I have left." However, we tend to imitate what he did and end up going backward. Ten years from now, we may be practicing the level of Aikido of O-Sensei as it was a number of years ago. After fifteen years, we may end up going back to the forms he practiced at an even earlier date. This is not right, he told us over and over again to go beyond what he did. People like us didn't understand what he meant. But after several years, when we ran into some obstacle, we would think to ourselves, "Oh, that's what he used to talk about." Our activities depend on O-Sensei's words.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2009, 07:06 AM   #4
DonMagee
Location: Indiana
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,311
United_States
Offline
Re: Moving beyond traditional/classic training classes and methods

I think it's fine to incorporate new things or change your own teaching in any way you see fit. You are the teacher after all.

That said, always, always, always do warm ups. Warm ups are not necessary for performing any martial art. What they do is simply lower the chance of injury from performing that martial art. I don't have to do warm ups to throw you, punch you, kick you, etc. I need to do warm ups before I'm thrown or joint locked to help prevent injury from a overzealous throw or joint lock.

So please, everyone, take the 5-10 minutes it takes to get everyone moving and stretching prior to any physical task.

- Don
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2009, 07:41 AM   #5
gdandscompserv
 
gdandscompserv's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,214
United_States
Offline
Re: Moving beyond traditional/classic training classes and methods

Quote:
Don Magee wrote: View Post
So please, everyone, take the 5-10 minutes it takes to get everyone moving and stretching prior to any physical task.
Not sure that stretching is a good form of warmups though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2009, 07:46 AM   #6
lbb
Location: Massachusetts
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,202
United_States
Offline
Re: Moving beyond traditional/classic training classes and methods

Quote:
Ricky Wood wrote: View Post
Not sure that stretching is a good form of warmups though.
It isn't, but most people mistakenly use the term "stretching" when what they really mean is a warmup.

(and, then again, many people mistakenly perform stretching exercises when they should be performing a warmup)
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2009, 08:06 AM   #7
DonMagee
Location: Indiana
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,311
United_States
Offline
Re: Moving beyond traditional/classic training classes and methods

My warmups consist of light exercise to get the body moving (jogging around the mat, rolls, a few situps, pushups, etc) followed by light stretching. Nothing intense. Once I have a light sweat going I'm good.

I have tried not doing the stretching and found that I almost always pull a muscle during more intense sparing if I don't stretch out. Usually in my bad shoulder, groin, or lower back.

After class I also try to do some more light exercise followed by more intense stretching.

- Don
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Hidden in Plain Sight" Book Discussion Ellis Amdur Supplies 80 12-08-2011 04:07 PM
Transmission, Inheritance, Emulation 10 Peter Goldsbury Columns 200 02-04-2009 07:45 AM
Transmission, Inheritance, Emulation 3 Peter Goldsbury Columns 16 05-28-2007 07:24 AM
Brawling with a friend Luc X Saroufim General 227 07-17-2006 08:33 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:59 PM.



vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2023 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
----------
Copyright 1997-2023 AikiWeb and its Authors, All Rights Reserved.
----------
For questions and comments about this website:
Send E-mail
plainlaid-picaresque outchasing-protistan explicantia-altarage seaford-stellionate