Welcome to AikiWeb Aikido Information
AikiWeb: The Source for Aikido Information
AikiWeb's principal purpose is to serve the Internet community as a repository and dissemination point for aikido information.

Sections
home
aikido articles
columns

Discussions
forums
aikiblogs

Databases
dojo search
seminars
image gallery
supplies
links directory

Reviews
book reviews
video reviews
dvd reviews
equip. reviews

News
submit
archive

Miscellaneous
newsletter
rss feeds
polls
about

Follow us on



Home > AikiWeb Aikido Forums
Go Back   AikiWeb Aikido Forums > Language

Hello and thank you for visiting AikiWeb, the world's most active online Aikido community! This site is home to over 22,000 aikido practitioners from around the world and covers a wide range of aikido topics including techniques, philosophy, history, humor, beginner issues, the marketplace, and more.

If you wish to join in the discussions or use the other advanced features available, you will need to register first. Registration is absolutely free and takes only a few minutes to complete so sign up today!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-20-2000, 10:21 PM   #1
akiy
 
akiy's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,812
Offline
So, what's your definition of the term "takemusu"?

-- Jun

Please help support AikiWeb -- become an AikiWeb Contributing Member!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2000, 11:56 PM   #2
akiy
 
akiy's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,812
Offline
Sheesh -- no takers?

My definition is in the spontaneous creation of a technique. Although this is very often most noticeable in jiyuwaza, I think that this can happen even in a "set" form like ikkyo or shihonage by the very miniscule "corrections" we make in order to fit into our partner's movements.

Anyone else?

-- Jun

Please help support AikiWeb -- become an AikiWeb Contributing Member!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2000, 08:53 AM   #3
Chuck Clark
 
Chuck Clark's Avatar
Dojo: Jiyushinkan
Location: Monroe, Washington
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,134
United_States
Offline
Hi Jun,

We just returned from the IJF International jodo gasshuku which is held somewhere in the world every three years. Tired, to say the least!

The way I understand this term is: the ability to create aikido waza which "fit" the situation presented each instant. The creative, intuitive decision making process is not "reactive" but proactive and is always based in sound principle.

Glad to be home.

Chuck Clark
Jiyushinkai Aikibudo
www.jiyushinkai.org
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2000, 11:43 AM   #4
Guest5678
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 135
Offline
Quote:
Chuck Clark wrote:
Hi Jun,

We just returned from the IJF International jodo gasshuku which is held somewhere in the world every three years. Tired, to say the least!

The way I understand this term is: the ability to create aikido waza which "fit" the situation presented each instant. The creative, intuitive decision making process is not "reactive" but proactive and is always based in sound principle.

Glad to be home.
Clark sensei,

I must beg to differ with PART of your definition anyway. I don't believe it's either reactive or proactive, but rather "interactive" as it occurs at the instant required. The training that allows for it to occur is certainly proactive though!

Just being knit-pricky,

Dan Pokorny
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2000, 06:24 PM   #5
Chuck Clark
 
Chuck Clark's Avatar
Dojo: Jiyushinkan
Location: Monroe, Washington
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,134
United_States
Offline
Good point, Dan. I didn't take it far enough.

Thanks,

Chuck Clark
Jiyushinkai Aikibudo
www.jiyushinkai.org
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2000, 08:42 PM   #6
George S. Ledyard
 
George S. Ledyard's Avatar
Dojo: Aikido Eastside
Location: Bellevue, WA
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,620
Offline
Quote:
akiy wrote:
So, what's your definition of the term "takemusu"?

-- Jun
O-Sensei repeated said that the Kami revealed technique to him. The statement Takemuso Aiki means that the techniques of the martial side of Aikido arise out of the state of Aiki or connection.

If you think about it you can begin to see what is meant. The role of the nage is to relax and blend with the movements of the uke. He must move as if he is a mirror image of the partner so there is no separation. Of course it is the job of the uke to be so in tune with nage that he can move without resistance with any movement that nage makes. So here is the crux of the matter, if uke is blending with nage and nage is blending with uke, who is in control? Who is the actor in the technique? When both egos vanish within the technique who is left?

At the point I think you have Takemusu Aiki. The techniques are in a sense creating themselves out of the state of connection between the partners. If this sounds like a great big Koan, it is.

George S. Ledyard
Aikido Eastside
Bellevue, WA
Aikido Eastside
AikidoDvds.Com
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2000, 09:50 AM   #7
Kristina Morris
Dojo: Kannagara Jinja
Location: Granite Falls, WA.
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 29
Offline
Smile

Then it could be defined as an inexhaustible fountain of energy.

One big blending of each partner's center.

Kristina
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2000, 10:02 AM   #8
Guest5678
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 135
Offline
Ledyard sensei,

Great post! One point has now caused much confusion for me (which isn't really that hard to do!).

In your "Koan" you posed the questions:

"So here is the crux of the matter, if uke is blending with nage and nage
is blending with uke, who is in control? Who is the actor in the technique? When both egos vanish within the technique who is left?"

If both egos vanish in the technique, there is no intent and therefore no attack, no technique is then required?........ Are we to assume then that uke lost the initial intent to attack somewhere within Takemusu? I ask this because the reality is uke does not start with the intention of blending with nage, but rather, uke starts by attempting to impose their will (an attack in this case) on nage. Nage's interaction with uke's attack hopefully negates uke's initial intention, thus merely changing uke's intention from one of attack to one of survival. At that point both nage and uke enter a common realm, one of survival. But in the event where "both egos vanish", ........ I guess I am not grasping the concept of both ego's vanishing......... no winner or loser? no attack and defense? Harmony.............?

Personally, I believe nage is in control throughout, even prior to any physical contact or connection. I base this on the fact that as soon as uke even precieves the idea of attack, self control is lost. Nage must then be responsible for controlling both uke and nage.

Still confused.....but still trying......

Dan Pokorny
  Reply With Quote

Please visit our sponsor:

Cognard Shihan 8th Dan - Cognard Andre Shihan 8th Dan (Hanshi, DNBK) in VA, CA, AZ (June 2014)



Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
F/S or Trade Takemusu Aikido Volume 5 Jeffrey Brown Marketplace 1 01-11-2007 07:33 AM
Takemusu Aiki in Systematic Teaching? Erick Mead Training 39 11-02-2006 09:55 AM
Takemusu Stefan Stenudd Language 32 06-09-2005 01:33 AM
General News: AANC Division I Becomes Takemusu Aikido Association AikiWeb System AikiWeb System 4 01-27-2002 12:01 PM
Wanted Takemusu Aikido Vol 1 Antony_Watson Supplies 3 11-15-2001 06:04 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:39 PM.



vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2014 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
----------
Copyright 1997-2014 AikiWeb and its Authors, All Rights Reserved.
----------
For questions and comments about this website:
Send E-mail
plainlaid-picaresque outchasing-protistan explicantia-altarage seaford-stellionate