Welcome to AikiWeb Aikido Information
AikiWeb: The Source for Aikido Information
AikiWeb's principal purpose is to serve the Internet community as a repository and dissemination point for aikido information.

Sections
home
aikido articles
columns

Discussions
forums
aikiblogs

Databases
dojo search
seminars
image gallery
supplies
links directory

Reviews
book reviews
video reviews
dvd reviews
equip. reviews

News
submit
archive

Miscellaneous
newsletter
rss feeds
polls
about

Follow us on



Home > AikiWeb Aikido Forums
Go Back   AikiWeb Aikido Forums > Announcements & Feedback

Hello and thank you for visiting AikiWeb, the world's most active online Aikido community! This site is home to over 22,000 aikido practitioners from around the world and covers a wide range of aikido topics including techniques, philosophy, history, humor, beginner issues, the marketplace, and more.

If you wish to join in the discussions or use the other advanced features available, you will need to register first. Registration is absolutely free and takes only a few minutes to complete so sign up today!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-23-2005, 06:31 PM   #1
eyrie
 
eyrie's Avatar
Location: Summerholm, Queensland
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,126
Australia
Offline
Atemi and Irimi thread closed - WHY?

Jun,

Why was the thread closed? Mike has a point. He was not being argumentative for the sake of being argumentative. You cannot attribute what someone said so-and-so said as evidence. That is heresay, not evidence.

It's like saying: B is the original source. A is a credible source having been in contact with B. So if A says B said X, then X MUST be correct, and by implication, A is correct. On what premise is A credible?

If we ran our justice system like that, then there would be many innocent people on deathrow... oh, wait, we do!

Ignatius
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2005, 06:45 PM   #2
akiy
 
akiy's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 6,049
Offline
Re: Atemi and Irimi thread closed - WHY?

Hi Ignatius,

I placed my reasoning in my post -- that the thread had become entirely unconstructive. The topic of the thread shifted entirely away from aikido and into a rather unconstructive (for the sake of the thread topic) argument

If folks wish to discuss the intricacies of citiations, authorities, and evidence, you're quite welcome to do so. Please, though, just do so in the Open Discussions forum.

Thank you,

-- Jun

Please help support AikiWeb -- become an AikiWeb Contributing Member!
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
atemi is 90% of Aikido Hagen Seibert General 217 10-12-2005 07:35 AM
Atemi and Irimi Dazzler General 22 03-23-2005 09:24 AM
Technically proficient/Tactically sound stern9631 Training 19 08-04-2004 01:07 AM
O Sensei starts "No Atemi" Aikido? tedehara Techniques 89 03-18-2004 08:28 AM
Atemi DavidM General 61 06-24-2002 10:04 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:22 PM.



vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
----------
Copyright 1997-2024 AikiWeb and its Authors, All Rights Reserved.
----------
For questions and comments about this website:
Send E-mail
plainlaid-picaresque outchasing-protistan explicantia-altarage seaford-stellionate