Welcome to AikiWeb Aikido Information
AikiWeb: The Source for Aikido Information
AikiWeb's principal purpose is to serve the Internet community as a repository and dissemination point for aikido information.

Sections
home
aikido articles
columns

Discussions
forums
aikiblogs

Databases
dojo search
seminars
image gallery
supplies
links directory

Reviews
book reviews
video reviews
dvd reviews
equip. reviews

News
submit
archive

Miscellaneous
newsletter
rss feeds
polls
about

Follow us on



Home > AikiWeb Aikido Forums
Go Back   AikiWeb Aikido Forums > General

Hello and thank you for visiting AikiWeb, the world's most active online Aikido community! This site is home to over 22,000 aikido practitioners from around the world and covers a wide range of aikido topics including techniques, philosophy, history, humor, beginner issues, the marketplace, and more.

If you wish to join in the discussions or use the other advanced features available, you will need to register first. Registration is absolutely free and takes only a few minutes to complete so sign up today!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-22-2014, 12:33 PM   #26
Dan Richards
Dojo: Latham Eclectic
Location: NY
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 452
United_States
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

Quote:
David Skaggs wrote: View Post
That is what everyone is doing with their Aikido already.
So, you think everyone is using what they have at their "disposal today... to make a radical and progressive evolution in Aikido?"

I don't see that at all, and I agree with Corky on the numbers being few. I'd hazard to guess the numbers are in the hundreds.

Quote:
Are you trying to get all people who practice Aikido to practice the same way?
Absolutely not. We're actually seeing a trend that's slowly growing with practice that's even more diversified - while still digging deeper to work with and refine the essence. And that's exactly the idea of "third wave."
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2014, 12:43 PM   #27
dps
 
dps's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,415
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

Quote:
Dan Richards wrote: View Post
We're actually seeing a trend that's slowly growing with practice that's even more diversified - while still digging deeper to work with and refine the essence. And that's exactly the idea of "third wave."
This observation is done from a few hundred trees in the forest of over a million and a half?

dps
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2014, 01:03 PM   #28
Erick Mead
 
Erick Mead's Avatar
Dojo: Big Green Drum (W. Florida Aikikai)
Location: West Florida
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,619
United_States
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

Quote:
Dan Richards wrote: View Post
Shu = first wave = martial apprentice
Ha = second wave = martial craftsman
Ri = third wave = martial artist
Shu Ha Ri has no meaning outside a system of defined forms.
First, obey the form, then break the form and then abandon the form.

If there is a defined form it must be practiced and learned so as to be effective -- if not -- it has zero martial value -- either in practical or educational terms.

I think the flaw in much aikido training lies here, actually -- at least when put in these terms.

The forms must be made to work, or they serve no purpose. Freeform shiai would be preferable -- but also provoke "threat reaction" and lose the essence of difference at the heart of aikido -- striving to eliminate of the very possibility of conflict. Solo work is important -- I do not deny -- my best period of personal advancement was two naval deployments where I did daily canon taijutsu, aiki taiso, empty hand shadowboxing waza, and weapons kata all by my lonesome.

The forms encode a -- there's that word again -- "perspective" of the reality of the action involved, which has many if not endless variations. I analogize it to a slice out of the whole apple -- the slice is informative about how the apple is -- but also fixed and partial in view in a way the whole is not, because it is continuous. Stacking slices over and and over makes a fair approximation of the whole, but a stack of apple slices is also not the reality of the apple.

My main criticism of the "internal-first" crowd is that you cannot see the inside of the apple without cutting it open, so what they are doing is not really as divorced from form as they would like to think. It is a different approach to form, clearly -- but not apart from the paradigm of "form-first." It just isn't the forms of the canon.

Where the canon determines its forms by obviously resulting overt actions -- the internal perspective is focusing on the form of the operative states of the body that happens to result in those actions. From one perspective they have a point. Their approach is operatively prior to what results. It is also true that results-oriented training tempts one to expedients that APPEAR similar in result -- but are not really. But it is also true that starting with a resulting action one can work into an awareness of -- and immediate demonstration -- of what did-- or did not -- just make that result occur -- the right ways and the wrong ways (and the just plain no-ways).

I don't fault some of the forms they are advocating -- pole/spear shaking is very good, as are lot of other things, and the refocusing on the Aiki taiso needs to happen anyway and more rigorously, and as we are. "Intent" as a paradigm though, is a tad abstruse as a concept, if you ask me. "Using stress" or "preparatory stress" developed in the structure focuses on the same basic perception they are seeming to get at -- or a more available "perspective": for most students (IMO).

Cordially,

Erick Mead
一隻狗可久里馬房但他也不是馬的.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2014, 01:08 PM   #29
Erick Mead
 
Erick Mead's Avatar
Dojo: Big Green Drum (W. Florida Aikikai)
Location: West Florida
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,619
United_States
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

Quote:
David Skaggs wrote: View Post
This observation is done from a few hundred trees in the forest of over a million and a half?
Statistical sample ?

NO ONE counts EACH of ALL the trees in the forest.

What is this anyway -- a democracy?

Cordially,

Erick Mead
一隻狗可久里馬房但他也不是馬的.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2014, 02:45 PM   #30
lbb
Location: Massachusetts
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,202
United_States
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

Quote:
David Skaggs wrote: View Post
This observation is done from a few hundred trees in the forest of over a million and a half?
In fairness, those are some pretty significant trees that were cited...not just any old sapling.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2014, 03:17 PM   #31
Dan Richards
Dojo: Latham Eclectic
Location: NY
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 452
United_States
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

Quote:
David Skaggs wrote: View Post
The evolution of Aikido started when Osensei evolved his martial art into his Aikido that he passed on to his students to make it their own and to pass on their Aikido. It continues today on this personal level.
The evolution of aikido started long before M Ueshiba, and what was "passed on" varied greatly - in both depth and substance. And even the name "aikido" as used by Ueshiba, the Ueshiba family, and Aikikai, didn't come along until after WWII, and occurred as the results of a confluence of nations, and quickly formulated and packaged as part of the Japanese education system. The aikido that was promoted to the world was mostly the results of his son, K. Ueshiba - who should absolutely be applauded for his contributions. He essentially did what Starbucks did, on a wider scale, by introducing the world to a deeper level of coffee enjoyment and culture than percolated canned, robusta-bean Folgers. That in and of itself is pretty huge.

And with aikido, as with coffee, there was also a smaller, more authentic current of culture, methods and practices. And we're entering a period where that current is becoming wider and more accessible. And other, previously small and even hidden - and even previously unavailable - currents, are flowing into it and enriching it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2014, 03:26 PM   #32
dps
 
dps's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,415
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

Quote:
Mary Malmros wrote: View Post
In fairness, those are some pretty significant trees that were cited...not just any old sapling.
The forest is wide and deep.

dps
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2014, 03:36 PM   #33
dps
 
dps's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,415
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

Quote:
Dan Richards wrote: View Post
And with aikido, as with coffee, there was also a smaller, more authentic current of culture, methods and practices.
More authentic by whose judgement?
Those who frequent the coffee shop?

"Authenticity is not just a word found in the name of Authentic Coffee Company. Authentic is a description of not only the coffee shop itself, but also all those who frequent it. "

http://connectionwh.com/authentic-co...presso-cms-264

dps

Last edited by dps : 09-22-2014 at 03:47 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2014, 03:52 PM   #34
kewms
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,318
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

Quote:
David Skaggs wrote: View Post
The crap that you don't want in your Aikido might be something essential to another person's Aikido and the essential elements in your Aikido might be crap to someone else.
Exactly. How do you form a consensus around "better" aikido if you have no consensus about "good" aikido?

Katherine
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2014, 03:59 PM   #35
kewms
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,318
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

Quote:
Dan Richards wrote: View Post
And with aikido, as with coffee, there was also a smaller, more authentic current of culture, methods and practices. And we're entering a period where that current is becoming wider and more accessible. And other, previously small and even hidden - and even previously unavailable - currents, are flowing into it and enriching it.
Please compare the water quality of the Mississippi at its source, in Minnesota, to its mouth, in Louisiana. "Wider," and "more accessible" could mean better, but could also mean contaminated or diluted beyond all recognition.

Generally speaking, there's an inherent conflict between high volume production (of coffee, budoka, or anything else) and high quality.

Katherine
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2014, 04:09 PM   #36
Jeremy Hulley
Dojo: Seattle School of Aikido Shinto Ryu/Seattle Icho Ryu
Location: Seattle
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 148
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

this is an interesting thread...stop feeding the troll.

Jeremy Hulley
Shinto Ryu Iai Battojutsu
Tuesday Night Bad Budo Club
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2014, 04:12 PM   #37
dps
 
dps's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,415
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

Quote:
Jeremy Hulley wrote: View Post
this is an interesting thread...stop feeding the troll.
He started the thread.

dps
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2014, 04:16 PM   #38
Erick Mead
 
Erick Mead's Avatar
Dojo: Big Green Drum (W. Florida Aikikai)
Location: West Florida
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,619
United_States
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

Quote:
Katherine Derbyshire wrote: View Post
Please compare the water quality of the Mississippi at its source, in Minnesota, to its mouth, in Louisiana. "Wider," and "more accessible" could mean better, but could also mean contaminated or diluted beyond all recognition.

Generally speaking, there's an inherent conflict between high volume production (of coffee, budoka, or anything else) and high quality.
HEY!

Hey, now!

Let's not be dissing Big Muddy!!

Plus, as someone once observed -- quantity has a quality all its own ...

Cordially,

Erick Mead
一隻狗可久里馬房但他也不是馬的.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2014, 01:42 AM   #39
Carsten Möllering
 
Carsten Möllering's Avatar
Dojo: Hildesheimer Aikido Verein
Location: Hildesheim
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 932
Germany
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

Quote:
Mary Malmros wrote: View Post
In fairness, those are some pretty significant trees that were cited...not just any old sapling.
Quote:
Dan Richards wrote: View Post
Seishiro Endo stated: ...
Since Endô sensei is one of those significant trees being cited in this thread I wonder how well you know him? Citing his article about shu ha ri in the context of this thread at least seems to indicate that you are not that familiar with his thoughts and his teaching?
This is my impression from practicing with him and talking to him.

Quote:
In a recent interview with Yoko Okamoto she stated:
And again: How familiar are you with the teaching of Okamoto sensei? How do you understand her phrases in the interview: " ... without losing the important aspects of our art ...", "... without losing the essence ..." and "... it must retain some discipline and an intense dedication to training ..."? Someone I know helped her building her dôjô in Kyôto. And as one of the top students of Christian Tissier and Yasuno sensei, she is linked to the context I am familiar with. I was perplexed when I saw her being cited in this thread.

It is my impression that neither Endô sensei nor Okamoto sensei can be considered supporters of what you call "Third Wave Aikido". I think you simply misunderstand the intention of at least those two "signifant trees".

Quote:
There is also the graph from Google Trends on Aikido ...
In which way does google trends say anything - not only anything meaningfull but anything at all - about the transmission of aikidô?
Established lines of tradition don't need google at all. (Endô sensei mostly communicates via fax ... ) And a newbie looking for a dôjô in town needs "aikido + XY". Which is not and will never be covered in the graph because the number of the requests is too small.


I have to admitt, I don't know your situation and I don't really understand the intention of this thread. But could it be that you struggle with a situation in which qualified teachers have more and more left the reliable structures of clear lines of tradition - i.e. the hierarchical structures ... - and are now teaching mostly independent on their own?

Last edited by Carsten Möllering : 09-23-2014 at 01:53 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2014, 02:56 AM   #40
Carsten Möllering
 
Carsten Möllering's Avatar
Dojo: Hildesheimer Aikido Verein
Location: Hildesheim
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 932
Germany
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

Quote:
Dan Richards wrote: View Post
He essentially did what Starbucks did, ...
Starbucks standardized it's product. And tried to be able to provide a vast quantity of this standardized product.

Second dôshu did neither.

He only provided a platform that made it possible for completely different individuals to stay together. So he standardized only his own aikidô in a certain way. Sohe established a kind of consensus of what to teach during certain classes at hombu. But there were also the classes that had the special flavour of the particular teacher. And a lot of teachers had their own dôjô where they taught their own way. Sugino, Tada, Yamaguchi, Watanabe, Nishio, Hikitsuchi, Saito, (and later then Endô) come to my mind, because I am connected in one way or another to these teachers. No standardisation. They went completely their own way. - With nidai dôshu as connecting link.

He (respectively hombu) did only send 1 person to every country. And hombu affiliated only 1 organization per country. Until year 2000 there was only one teacher in Germany, who could give you a gradution of the aikikai. Same in France, with not one teacher but one commitee. The shihan / shibu system of the aikikai is clearly different from the network of branches of Starbucks. Even now, when there are more then only one shihan inour country.

Last edited by Carsten Möllering : 09-23-2014 at 03:03 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2014, 03:06 AM   #41
MRoh
Location: Düsseldorf
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 256
Germany
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

Quote:
Dan Richards wrote: View Post
The aim of this discussion, and the idea of Third Wave Aikido, is the moving away from the Folgers and Starbucks level of Aikido practice and move into a level of quality we're seeing arise in other industries that are using the highest quality principles, practices, methods, technologies, and communication to further the overall level of experience for everyone involved.
There are some highly qualified teachers operating worldwide.
Go to one of this teachers and study intensively..

Last edited by MRoh : 09-23-2014 at 03:15 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2014, 08:39 AM   #42
Brian Gillaspie
 
Brian Gillaspie's Avatar
Dojo: School of Martial and Meditative Arts
Location: Topeka, KS
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 77
United_States
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

I watch a lot of aikido videos on youtube. There are some I like and some I don't but I don't think that indicates whether what I'm watching is good or bad aikido. I understand the desire to make aikido something better than average but being such a varied art I don't think there will ever be a consensus to what good aikido is.

I try my best, and admittedly I'm not always successful, to not worry about how other dojos and organizations train. I focus on making my aikido the best it can be for me. I cross train in other arts and sometimes that works it's way into aikido. Maybe that means my aikido is evolving away from "Folgers" aikido or maybe it means I'm doing something that's not really aikido.

Keep in mind my perspective is coming from someone who has only trained in an independent dojo. I've never been involved with any large aikido organizations so maybe it's a little easier for me to just train and not really worry about the state of aikido across the world.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2014, 09:56 AM   #43
MRoh
Location: Düsseldorf
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 256
Germany
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

Quote:
Corky Quakenbush wrote: View Post
For the past ten years I have been developing a teaching model that only trains the elemental movements of aikido so that they may be combined into compounds that are more in alignment with the energy being expressed by uke in the moment of the attack. I have not taught a technique (as defined in the aikido world) in over ten years, yet my students have attained a higher level of understanding of the principles of aiki within a year or two than I had come to understand in ten to twenty years of training in the technique emulation model.
Techniques as usually trained in todays aikido, represent a selection of techniques the founder considered as important for training the body in a special way.
Saito Sensei or others found a teaching model that made it easier to understand how the basis should be developed, so that training stept by step leads to more understanding and to a well trained body. On such a base you can come some day to an understanding what "takemusu aiki" means.

The Aikido of most students I've seen, who were tought in models that rely on "principles", was missing a "core" and their technical skills had no foundation, their understanding of Aikido was limited.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2014, 04:00 PM   #44
Dan Richards
Dojo: Latham Eclectic
Location: NY
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 452
United_States
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

Quote:
Carsten Möllering wrote: View Post
I have to admitt, I don't know your situation and I don't really understand the intention of this thread. But could it be that you struggle with a situation in which qualified teachers have more and more left the reliable structures of clear lines of tradition - i.e. the hierarchical structures ... - and are now teaching mostly independent on their own?
Hi Carsten, rather than struggling, I actually find it exciting that more teachers are leaving political structures within aikido, and striking out on their own more independently. I agree that these - and other - arts are passed down through lineages of people. And even during it's time, the hierarchical structure of Aikikai and other large organizations certainly helped to promote and spread aikido to the world. And aikido - as a progressive and living art - has passed through that stage of evolution.

And here's Yamada again, in an interview
Quote:
In my opinion, the time of spreading aikido to the world is finished; now we have to focus on quality.
Do you know of any other kind of art endeavor - such as music, painting, cooking, etc. - that requires people to kowtow (1. act in an excessively subservient manner.) to a political organization, teachers, technical form, and ranking structure?

There are quite a few people in the world now who have trained 25+ years - many with direct students of M. Ueshiba. The last generations of direct students have been passing away in recent years.

More and more, there are qualified people teaching and training independently, with little interest in politics and ranking. These people are free to explore, refine, and reinvent pedagogical and training methods. These people are often open and sharing freely with others. They're also incorporating and experimenting with new technologies and communication.

I'm not putting out - nor am I hearing from others who are teaching, discovering, and exploring independently - any kind of anti-Folgers or anti- Starbucks sentiments. There is nothing "anti-establishment" about this.

"Third wave" coffee is not anti-establishment. In fact, they're thankful for the market, resources, and technologies that allows them to develop, prosper, and even exist. And they all have diversified and highly individual expressions that revolve around certain common core principles.

In 2008, Jonathan Gold of the LA Weekly defined third wave coffee:
Quote:
The first wave of American coffee culture was probably the 19th-century surge that put Folgers on every table, and the second was the proliferation, starting in the 1960s at Peet's and moving smartly through the Starbucks grande decaf latte, of espresso drinks and regionally labeled coffee. We are now in the third wave of coffee connoisseurship, where beans are sourced from farms instead of countries, roasting is about bringing out rather than incinerating the unique characteristics of each bean, and the flavor is clean and hard and pure.
There are pockets of aikido and practitioners that we could call "third wave aikido" who are doing exactly that. It's the idea of taking newer technologies and levels of experience, and really taking it back to "old school." Another way to look at it would be something along the lines of a return to "pre-industrial martial arts."
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2014, 05:36 PM   #45
Dan Richards
Dojo: Latham Eclectic
Location: NY
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 452
United_States
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

Quote:
Erick Mead wrote: View Post
Shu Ha Ri has no meaning outside a system of defined forms.
First, obey the form, then break the form and then abandon the form.

If there is a defined form it must be practiced and learned so as to be effective -- if not -- it has zero martial value -- either in practical or educational terms.

I think the flaw in much aikido training lies here, actually -- at least when put in these terms.

The forms must be made to work, or they serve no purpose. Freeform shiai would be preferable -- but also provoke "threat reaction" and lose the essence of difference at the heart of aikido -- striving to eliminate of the very possibility of conflict. Solo work is important -- I do not deny -- my best period of personal advancement was two naval deployments where I did daily canon taijutsu, aiki taiso, empty hand shadowboxing waza, and weapons kata all by my lonesome.

The forms encode a -- there's that word again -- "perspective" of the reality of the action involved, which has many if not endless variations. I analogize it to a slice out of the whole apple -- the slice is informative about how the apple is -- but also fixed and partial in view in a way the whole is not, because it is continuous. Stacking slices over and and over makes a fair approximation of the whole, but a stack of apple slices is also not the reality of the apple.

My main criticism of the "internal-first" crowd is that you cannot see the inside of the apple without cutting it open, so what they are doing is not really as divorced from form as they would like to think. It is a different approach to form, clearly -- but not apart from the paradigm of "form-first." It just isn't the forms of the canon.

Where the canon determines its forms by obviously resulting overt actions -- the internal perspective is focusing on the form of the operative states of the body that happens to result in those actions. From one perspective they have a point. Their approach is operatively prior to what results. It is also true that results-oriented training tempts one to expedients that APPEAR similar in result -- but are not really. But it is also true that starting with a resulting action one can work into an awareness of -- and immediate demonstration -- of what did-- or did not -- just make that result occur -- the right ways and the wrong ways (and the just plain no-ways).

I don't fault some of the forms they are advocating -- pole/spear shaking is very good, as are lot of other things, and the refocusing on the Aiki taiso needs to happen anyway and more rigorously, and as we are. "Intent" as a paradigm though, is a tad abstruse as a concept, if you ask me. "Using stress" or "preparatory stress" developed in the structure focuses on the same basic perception they are seeming to get at -- or a more available "perspective": for most students (IMO).
I agree 100% with you, Erick.

There's a recent translation by Chris Li, Hakaru Mori on the Aiki of Tenouchi. It was interesting to read this, and have reaffirmed how I've been approaching teaching recently, by separately but concurrently training Aiki/IP and Chin Na.

From the article:
Quote:
In order to apply Aiki and execute Aiki techniques, the strength, technical points and other essentials required for joint techniques are not necessary requirements. You could even say that they are an impediment.

In order to apply Aiki and draw out the opponent's instinctive unconscious movement you must not grasp the opponent. You must not put power into the opponent. At least, you must not allow the opponent to feel as if power is being brought to bear.

In other words, the fundamental principles behind Aiki techniques and joint techniques are completely different, stated extremely one could even say that their technical principles are diametrically opposed. Accordingly, however much one trains in joint techniques, that alone will absolutely not enable one to accomplish Aiki techniques.

Of course, the reverse is also true, that however much one trains in Aiki techniques, it is absolutely impossible to achieve mastery of correct and effective joint techniques.

Therefore, it can be said that in order to master Aiki and Aiki techniques, those training must learn joint techniques in parallel with Aiki techniques before they become tainted and strangled by the technical principles of learning joint techniques alone. At each practice, switching between the technical principles of both must occur not only intellectually, but also naturally and smoothly with the body.

If one trains this way repeatedly, in the end both sets of technical principles will become fused in the body, and they will become able to freely repeat the natural techniques of Aiki-jujutsu.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2014, 07:36 PM   #46
kewms
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,318
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

Quote:
Dan Richards wrote: View Post
Do you know of any other kind of art endeavor - such as music, painting, cooking, etc. - that requires people to kowtow (1. act in an excessively subservient manner.) to a political organization, teachers, technical form, and ranking structure?
Yes, all of them.

You can cook whatever you want in your own kitchen, but if you want someone to actually pay you that Culinary Institute training will come in pretty handy.

Credentials matter in any endeavor large enough to have participants who don't personally know each other. And as soon as you give someone power to issue credentials -- formally or informally -- you introduce politics, teachers, and all the rest.

Katherine
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2014, 08:11 PM   #47
Dan Richards
Dojo: Latham Eclectic
Location: NY
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 452
United_States
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

Thank you, Katherine, as I didn't explain my meaning fully. I meant during the lifetime pursuit of the art. Of course, there is often the initial intensive educational period and structured classes taken by students. But after that period, the artist is then usually free for the rest of their lives to independently pursue and explore their art and craft as they wish. Of course they may have various teachers and guides along the way, but nothing that mirrors the kinds of "rising in the ranks" we see in some martial arts - which are structured as a sort of pseudo-military organization.

So, I'll rephrase that:

Do you know of any other kind of art endeavor - such as music, painting, cooking, etc. - that requires people to kowtow (1. act in an excessively subservient manner.) to a political organization, teachers, technical form, and ranking structure - throughout the entire lifetime of the artist?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2014, 08:39 PM   #48
Dan Richards
Dojo: Latham Eclectic
Location: NY
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 452
United_States
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

It may or may not be worth going to the Culinary Institute. Anthony Bourdain and David Chang did, along with many others. But the important thing is, after they received their training and degree, they were free from any further alignment or politics with their particular institute.

And there are many chefs that received their training in the field, rather than at an institution. In fact, Bourdain now says he prefers, "hard-working and devoted but unlearned Ecuadorians to college graduates."

There's an interesting and similar topic, Educated and Uneducated Chefs.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2014, 09:18 PM   #49
robin_jet_alt
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 716
Australia
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

Quote:
Dan Richards wrote: View Post

Do you know of any other kind of art endeavor - such as music, painting, cooking, etc. - that requires people to kowtow (1. act in an excessively subservient manner.) to a political organization, teachers, technical form, and ranking structure - throughout the entire lifetime of the artist?
Aikido doesn't either, though. My goal in training is to get better. I can do that without kowtowing. Sure, I might have to Kowtow to get a rank in a particular organisation, but that isn't my goal.

Perhaps a better question would be "do you know of any other kind of art endeavor that has practitioners who are so focused on obtaining arbitrary 'ranks' and are happy to kowtow in order to do it."
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2014, 10:16 PM   #50
RonRagusa
Dojo: Berkshire Hills Aikido
Location: Massachusetts
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 824
United_States
Offline
Re: Third Wave Aikido

Quote:
Dan Richards wrote: View Post
1. What do we have at our disposal today that we can use to make a radical and progressive evolution in Aikido?
Given the widely diverse forms of Aikido practiced today, can you make a convincing case that "a radical and progressive evolution in Aikido" is necessary? The network model of Aikido's structure allows for constantly evolving forms of "methods, practices organizations, etc." to come into being and flourish or wither.

Quote:
Dan Richards wrote: View Post
2. What, within the current state of Aikido - including methods, practices, organizations, etc., is not working? Let's look at the crap and get rid of it.
When I first read this statement I was immediately struck by the thought that here comes another savior of Aikido whose going to show us all the one true way. But after reading some of your subsequent posts it seems that I may have rushed to judgement. I'm always leery when someone seeks to form a group of like minded thinkers and decide, based on their ideas, to winnow the wheat from the chaff.

I think that the main flaw with your proposal is that it seems to require viewing Aikido as a monolithic entity; something that Aikido has long since evolved away from.

Ron

  Reply With Quote

Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What Keganin No Senshi Aikido Is Thomas Osborn External Aikido Blog Posts 1 04-24-2014 02:39 PM
Integrity in our Aikido Community Marc Abrams Announcements & Feedback 41 02-14-2012 05:14 PM
Aikido Scam by an Indian group ze'ev erlich General 10 08-02-2009 06:46 PM
Transmission, Inheritance, Emulation 10 Peter Goldsbury Columns 200 02-04-2009 06:45 AM
Aikido in Amsterdam, Terry Lax style... tiyler_durden General 11 11-03-2008 08:31 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:05 AM.



vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2024 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
----------
Copyright 1997-2024 AikiWeb and its Authors, All Rights Reserved.
----------
For questions and comments about this website:
Send E-mail
plainlaid-picaresque outchasing-protistan explicantia-altarage seaford-stellionate