Ruth McWilliam wrote:
How many other cases such as that one (which you state was resolved in June this year) have you run a website on Dave?
It's pretty obvious that is who you
are referring to!
Can you let it drop, now that it has been resolved?
It's only obvious to those who know. You and I BOTH know that.
And as I've been at pains to explain, no specific information or names were mentioned in this thread. Four (or so) lines out of a 5 paragraph post, hardly consititutes "victimisation" or a referal to a particular person. (although I conceed it doesn't take a rocket scientist to assume whom I may refer too if you've read the information and know of the situation)
My point here is that I made a very short reference to somthing I had been involved in which partly related to the subject of this thread, despite this, your goodself and Si Wilson have seen fit to specifically mention Mr. Poole and or the matters relating to him by name.
Indeed your posts
are the ones which bring Mr. Poole's name to the forefront of potentially MANY people on this board that aren't, or weren't aware of anything to do with Mr. Poole or issues relating to him.
Ironic that, don't you think?
I won't respond further to this topic because I've made my point both on the subject of my reply to you and Si, and to the person making the first post.
Feel free to PM me if you anything further to say on the matter.