Welcome to AikiWeb Aikido Information
AikiWeb: The Source for Aikido Information
AikiWeb's principal purpose is to serve the Internet community as a repository and dissemination point for aikido information.

aikido articles


dojo search
image gallery
links directory

book reviews
video reviews
dvd reviews
equip. reviews


rss feeds

Follow us on

Home > AikiWeb Aikido Forums
Go Back   AikiWeb Aikido Forums > General

Hello and thank you for visiting AikiWeb, the world's most active online Aikido community! This site is home to over 22,000 aikido practitioners from around the world and covers a wide range of aikido topics including techniques, philosophy, history, humor, beginner issues, the marketplace, and more.

If you wish to join in the discussions or use the other advanced features available, you will need to register first. Registration is absolutely free and takes only a few minutes to complete so sign up today!

Thread Tools
Old 06-18-2003, 01:42 PM   #1
Alex Cox
Dojo: Aikido of Richmond, Wadokai Aikido
Location: Richmond, VA
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5
Internal Vs. External

Hey all,

I was discussing internal versus external martial arts with a friend, when he asked me to explain what "internal" means. I tried to explain center, grounding and relaxation to him, but he still didn't get it.

How would you explain what an internal martial art is to a non-aikidoka?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2003, 02:15 PM   #2
Lyle Bogin
Dojo: Shin Budo Kai
Location: Manhattan
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 588
The origins of the internal external debate are essentially political. There is an excellent article to this effect in the Journal of Asian Martial Arts (if I have time I will look up the issue # and post it).

The first reference to internal and external arts in in a eulogy written about a ming loyalist general. Internal referred to the Chinese (Ming), and external refered to the conquering Manchus (Qing). Much later, there is reference to a martial arts political organization of the "Internal Schools", form mostly of the "sister styles" (tai chi, hsing I, ba gua). And on and on. Again, "internal" means something more like "native" in this context.

It seems to me that any exclusionary philosophy (such as separating internal from external) would be in violation of the fundamental philosophical principals from which the arts were born. Yin (In) and Yang (Yo). Mu. Etc.

Therefore, after many years of fumbling around this subject, I don't think the differentiation has any real meaning, although it may be used to designate a style as this or that for promotional or political purposes. The idea that internal styles use a more powerful or elusive kind of strength is attractive, but it conflicts with the fact that many "externalists" make the very same discoveries in their training.

"The martial arts progress from the complex to the simple."
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2003, 02:26 PM   #3
Larry Feldman
Dojo: Atlanta School of Aikido
Location: Atlanta, GA
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 373
I read this description somewhere....

You can watch an external style and (with time)understand what they are doing, and how to do it.

You can watch an internal style and never really understand what they are doing, or how to do it.

To me the difference is how you feel after training.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2003, 03:18 AM   #4
gasman's Avatar
Dojo: Sunyata
Location: Oslo
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 114
internal and external cannot be separated, and sure, the external stylist will work on the same internal principles as will the internal stylist work on the external principles.

to me the difference lies in the method of training, one starts in one end, the other starts in the other. eventually they meet. for example, whereas the karateka will start off training full force punches, the tai chi student will start off training coordination between breath and movement.

still, imho the internal schools are better at teaching sensing and controlling.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2003, 03:29 AM   #5
ian's Avatar
Dojo: University of Ulster, Coleriane
Location: Northern Ireland
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,654
I never really think as aikido as an internal martial art - I always feel it lies somewhere between the two. I thought Larrys description was perfect though (and I think that no-one has fully received what Ueshiba was doing). I presume when he says how you feel after training; with internal you should feel energised, whereas with external you feel tired?

Although I believe it is mostly if not entirely mechanical, the unbendable arm demonstration may help to illustrate it (I think the mechanical and internal are linked - in my opinion the discussion of chi is a simple method for explaining a complicated and multifaceted thing more easily).


---understanding aikido is understanding the training method---
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2003, 05:52 AM   #6
batemanb's Avatar
Dojo: Seibukan Aikido UK
Location: body in UK, heart still in Japan
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,031
I would say that an internal art is one where there is little or no conflict in the movement between tori and uke. In an external art, whilst the movement may essentially be the same as the internal, there is more conflict between tori and uke.

Or in another way:

External arts may use forceful blocks within their motion before redirecting/ countering an attack. Internal arts don't block, they try to absorb the attack keeping it in constant motion whilst redirecting it.

I appreciate that there is a lot more to this (strength vs power etc.), I'm not even sure that explains what I was trying to say, but that's as simple as I can put it.

Ultimately though, they both exist within each other, and can't exist without each other.

Just my quick thoughts over lunch


A difficult problem is easily solved by asking yourself the question, "Just how would the Lone Ranger handle this?"
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2003, 08:37 AM   #7
Carl Simard
Location: Quebec City
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 96
The way I've understand the internal/external thing is that, in an external style, your goal is to win a fight against an opponent (you work on something outside yourself), in an internal style, the goal is the win the fight against yourself (you work on something inside yourself).

This also explains why most external arts (like karate, kung-fu, TWD...) give a greater emphasis on competition than the so-called internal ones (like tai-chi, aikido, etc...).

That said, I don't think there's one martial art that's really 100% internal or external. A 100% external MA will put no emphasis on concentration, balance, etc... A 100% internal art will be like sitting and doing meditation the whole time...

So, every martial art is a blend of the two. It's just that the proportion of each element is different, and the art is put in the category of it's main element.

To make it short, external may be viewed as "Taking control of someone to learn how to control yourself" and internal may be viewed as "Control yourself before being able to take control of someone else". So, in the end, everybody is on top on the same hill. It's just the way to get on top that's different.

My 2 cents...
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2003, 09:17 AM   #8
Larry Feldman
Dojo: Atlanta School of Aikido
Location: Atlanta, GA
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 373
Ian - The short answer to your energized/tired question is yes.

To expand, the physical exertion from an external style can give you a nice buzz after class. But the difference is that in the internal style my body didn't feel 'beat up' from the practice, just tired.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2003, 09:21 AM   #9
Lyle Bogin
Dojo: Shin Budo Kai
Location: Manhattan
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 588
I feel that separating styles of martial arts in this way is detrimental to study of the subject. It has forced me to make judgements that are not necessarily correct or even useful. I just can't buy into it anymore because it has made me make so many false assumptions, many of them mentioned in this thread as people's definitions. It is a much bigger issue in Chinese Martial Arts, it seems. Well, at least everyone can cop-out at the end with the old top of the same mountain statement .

"The martial arts progress from the complex to the simple."
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2003, 10:34 AM   #10
akiy's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 6,000
Lyle Bogin wrote:
I feel that separating styles of martial arts in this way is detrimental to study of the subject.
Agreed. At last year's Aiki Expo, Ushiro sensei (7th dan, Shindo-ryu karate) talked a lot about the use of kokyu in his karate. I remember some fourth or fifth dan guy I was training with in my karate days trying to explain center to center connection in karate (which I didn't get back then)...

I think this sort of distinction is like the so-called distinction between "do" and "jutsu" arts. It's not much of a distinction, in the long run...

-- Jun

Please help support AikiWeb -- become an AikiWeb Contributing Member!
  Reply With Quote

Please visit our sponsor:

AikiWeb Sponsored Links - Place your Aikido link here for only $10!


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
aiki ethics and internal training jeff. General 19 12-14-2006 07:12 AM
Practical internal training ? Mark Gibbons Training 113 12-13-2006 02:54 PM
Internal & External strength discussion statisticool Open Discussions 16 09-10-2006 10:03 AM
Article: Creating Internal Resources by Lynn Seiser AikiWeb System AikiWeb System 5 05-23-2006 08:39 PM
Aikido internal and slow? seba368 General 16 05-09-2006 04:15 AM

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:46 PM.

vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2018 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
Copyright 1997-2018 AikiWeb and its Authors, All Rights Reserved.
For questions and comments about this website:
Send E-mail
plainlaid-picaresque outchasing-protistan explicantia-altarage seaford-stellionate