Welcome to AikiWeb Aikido Information
AikiWeb: The Source for Aikido Information
AikiWeb's principal purpose is to serve the Internet community as a repository and dissemination point for aikido information.

aikido articles


dojo search
image gallery
links directory

book reviews
video reviews
dvd reviews
equip. reviews


rss feeds

Follow us on

Home > AikiWeb Aikido Forums
Go Back   AikiWeb Aikido Forums > Open Discussions

Hello and thank you for visiting AikiWeb, the world's most active online Aikido community! This site is home to over 22,000 aikido practitioners from around the world and covers a wide range of aikido topics including techniques, philosophy, history, humor, beginner issues, the marketplace, and more.

If you wish to join in the discussions or use the other advanced features available, you will need to register first. Registration is absolutely free and takes only a few minutes to complete so sign up today!

Thread Tools
Old 09-18-2012, 03:11 AM   #1
Anthony Loeppert
Dojo: Aikido of Del Mar
Location: San Diego, CA
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 155
Word accuracy vs. precision

In another thread, the concept of accurate vs. precise came up with respect to words.

Please read:
paying attention to the target analogy.

Words convey meaning. Words have definite (a tautology) definitions*. Each word means what it does, simply pick up a dictionary. The precision of a word is either non-applicable or infinite, (again) with respect to the target analogy, because each time a specific word is used it means a specific thing.

Words have multiple meaning one might say... and of course this is true, but the precision is the same each time.

Now accuracy... if intent to express is the bulls-eye, then picking the right word to match up with the closest meaning is most accurate. But the word's precision doesn't change. It means what it means however many times you use it - again, there can be multiple meanings but the precision of each meaning doesn't change. So I argue precision of words is meaningless, only accuracy matters.

Please reason otherwise if you so desire.

* we can argue on which dictionary to use, but trust me, there are standards in the linguistic world.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 09:49 AM   #2
Howard Prior
Location: Crownsville, Md
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 42
Re: Word accuracy vs. precision

Anthony Loeppert wrote: View Post
So I argue precision of words is meaningless, only accuracy matters.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 01:16 PM   #3
Anthony Loeppert
Dojo: Aikido of Del Mar
Location: San Diego, CA
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 155
Re: Word accuracy vs. precision

Howard Prior wrote: View Post
Good one.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 03:50 PM   #4
Basia Halliop
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 711
Re: Word accuracy vs. precision

Personally, I think they both matter, though I agree that accuracy matters far far more.

If the word you choose is inaccurate, then precision is completely irrelevant and meaningless either way.

BUT, once you've got accuracy covered, than precision can make an important additional difference. Of course, sometimes you don't want to be precise, you want to keep your words intentionally a bit general, but other times you want to really get right onto an exact meaning. Sometimes being too vague is confusing, even if it's accurate.

(If anyone is unclear on the difference, accuracy is more about something (a word or a measurement) being right or wrong, while precision is how exact it is. So if an elephant actually weighs 3.452 tonnes it's obviously better to say this elephant weighs 'somewhere between two and five tonnes' (accurate but imprecise) vs saying it weighs 145.73 kg (very precise but totally inaccurate). On the other hand, sometimes it's useful to get more precise (e.g. between 3.4 and 3.5 tonnes)).

In writing accuracy would mean if the word even means what you think it means, precision would be if the idea it expresses is more vague or more specific. So I don't think precision is at all meaningless or unimportant, it's just that it absolutely must come a step down the list after accuracy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 11:03 PM   #5
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 193
Re: Word accuracy vs. precision

The speaker must understand the precision and accuracy of the words they use. However it is just as important that the speaker understands how the audience will understand and interpret those words.

Meaningful communication breaks down when the intended and interpreted meanings are different. It is quite irrelevant whether this is caused by the speaker misusing words or the listener failing to understand the 'true' intended meaning, the results are the same. Great speakers use plain language, great listeners need a good vocabulary.

What is worse is that the many major media networks seems to constantly use subtle pejorative language especially on issues of race and religion, and that this negativity becomes engrained into the subconscious of the listeners and the fabric of a society as a whole. The saddest part is that I am not sure that even the reporters always realise they are doing it.

Enjoy the journey
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2012, 01:36 PM   #6
jonreading's Avatar
Dojo: Aikido South (formerly Emory Aikikai)
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,153
Re: Word accuracy vs. precision

My understanding of the two concepts is more scientific. Accuracy is a measurement of quality, precision is a measurement of quantity.

From the other thread, I choose to use the term accurate because precision can be incorrect and still a valid definition. The target analogy works here. If I shoot ten rounds low-left, I was in-accurate, but precise. Similarly, if I call a chicken a duck ten times, I am still using the wrong term but at least I am consistent...
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2012, 04:07 PM   #7
C. David Henderson
Location: Santa Fe New Mexico
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 606
Re: Word accuracy vs. precision

I think with language sometimes it is more accurate to be less precise, as it "is difficult to paint a clear picture of a fuzzy object."

I also think the idea that a dictionary has authority to delimit meaning is of fairly recent origin. While this cultural convention is undoubtedly useful, it does not describe something inherent in natural language use, written or oral.

The meaning of words used in speech or writing is not fixed, and there are determinants of meaning that speakers and listeners, writers and readers attach that do not turn on the definition of individual words. Examples -- irony, or poetry.

Whether I understand what you say and write is subject to a (somewhat fuzzy) process of provisional attribution and confirmation.


David Henderson
  Reply With Quote

Please visit our sponsor:

AikiWeb Sponsored Links - Place your Aikido link here for only $10!


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kiai -- Precision & Abandon Erick Mead Training 10 08-30-2009 10:32 PM
Transmission, Inheritance, Emulation 14 Peter Goldsbury Columns 38 08-01-2009 12:19 AM
Transmission, Inheritance, Emulation 12 Peter Goldsbury Columns 32 05-16-2009 07:05 PM
Article: A Re-transliteration of Osensei's "Kannagara no Jutsu" by "The Grindstone" AikiWeb System AikiWeb System 57 01-28-2007 01:12 PM
Word explanations JJF Announcements & Feedback 4 06-19-2002 05:16 AM

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:08 AM.

vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2018 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
Copyright 1997-2018 AikiWeb and its Authors, All Rights Reserved.
For questions and comments about this website:
Send E-mail
plainlaid-picaresque outchasing-protistan explicantia-altarage seaford-stellionate