Quote:
Dan Harden wrote:
Hanmi is as divorced from "creating structure" as eating cheese.
Thinking it is -linked-to creating structure is a profound failure.
This is continuously shown in open rooms , now in front of hundreds of teachers and students alike. We can pretend it isn't happening, but we would be just pretending.
|
Hanmi is related to
awase (musubi). There is a counter-case for lateral stability, but then so there is for poor
awase (musubi), especially with weapons. Whichever you favour, it is clear and passed down through the
kuden and dictations that Osensei worked on forms of
hanmi. Lecturing us yet again on the virtues of your take on Aiki does not change that. Reminding us that more and more people know what you are talking about now is a reason to stop lecturing us and help resolve the question in the OP.
Quote:
Dan Harden wrote:
I am certain that when he was hanging out an experimenting/ training/watching all manner of things; koryu, modern weapons, Bayonet, even playing with Judo, that he...learned..something...anything different than what he got from Takeda.
|
Previously, you obviously agreed that Osensei took influence beyond Daito Ryu.
Quote:
Dan Harden wrote:
I mean let's face it, he came from an informal Itto ryu and Jikishinkage ryu background into watching/ possibly training (I'd bet on it) informally in TSKSR and KSR and Yagyu. No one is EVER going to mistake Itto ryu's approach for Shinto ryu.
|
You even name some of the examples others have said.
Quote:
Dan Harden wrote:
Ya don't think he picked up some things? Continued to develop? So even if he picked up one principle...cough. With all that exposure that's it...ONE...are you kidding me....What was he, blind?
|