Quote:
Keith Larman wrote:
FWIW...
Or to use Webster's
Definition 2 pretty much encapsulates the notions of definition 1 including the predestination aspect.
I see what you're saying now, but again I think you're making up meanings as you go. That's not exactly conducive to communication...
|
Think what you want but admit when you're wrong and casting false aspersions. Those definitions given are from a dictionary so I'm not making anything up thank you very much.
Some people ie: Lynn, were obviously used to that definition being used so just because you were not means just that, you were not. (along with some others) So it has now been clarified.
Ref. for those who feel pedantic. World book dictionary, thorndike and barnhart, determine definitions 1,2, and 3. vt.
Regards.G.