Quote:
Dan Rubin wrote:
"The method portrayed in this book is different in that the initial balance-breaking motion is a good atemi, or strike, that dazes the opponent."
|
Just to make sure I've got the meaning of this qoute right.
Is it saying that any form of initial balance-breaking is considered "Atemi"?? Regardless of whether it is a strike or otherwise??
Or is it saying that ONLY by atemi striking is balance-breaking achieved?? No other ways of balance-breaking is effective??