View Single Post
Old 09-20-2007, 03:03 AM   #20
Mark Freeman
Dojo: Dartington
Location: Devon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,220
United Kingdom
Re: In Defence of George W. Bush

David Chalk wrote: View Post

You did imply (suggest) and someone else inferred (concluded) although unsurprisingly his conclusion do not stand up to examination.
What are you 'on' David? As you and I have been (inferred)publicly 'outed', on the now defunct thread, as being chemically dependant, I was curious as to which ones you use to make your views so deluded

Seriously though, I can't post anything on the topic here as I have to go and meet my candyman


p.s. Sorry Neil, not trying to hijack your thread, I just find myself at a loss when asked to write in the defence of GWB, perhaps if I switch my meds?

Success is having what you want. Happiness is wanting what you have.