"It can be analyzed" doesn't mean "It is being/has been analyzed".
Can anyone provide citations of peer reviewed published studies? I'm all ears (read: eyes)
Big can of worms.
This video (now 4 years old) is fun to watch, and the motion-capture body sensors are rockin', but the student-researchers barely scratch the surface of what's going on:
Their mentor professor did a more in-depth study (see link below), but also failed to determine what Chen Xiang -- an IP-conditioned Baji and Taiji practitioner -- was doing. So, even with video with state-of-the-art motion-capture sensors, and top-flight scientific researchers at Stanford getting their hands on an "internal" martial artist, they still are baffled at the source of his power, and end up calling his IP source "Chi."
The complexity and nuance of what he is doing within his body was not captured by the sensors,
There is a lot of stuff published in medical and sports medicine journals, etc. concerning typical martial and combat arts. No shortage of stuff about "external" power generation (conventional hip torque-driven power, etc.) --
But because IP and aiki are lesser-known body skills, and are not mainstream (especially not in the sports world), they are still under the radar for these researchers.
That's why the Stanford people were so blown away by Chen. It's something they had never seen before in any of their athlete