Quote:
Peter Rehse wrote:
Well a picture is worth a thousand words and a video, I guess, is worth 10,000. The wikipedia article is pretty white bread due to a concerted effort to be neutral and even; which is as it should be. The problem with videos is they rarely present the system but moment in time, a particular aspect, or a demo by some practitioners. As said - can be better than wikipedia - but still .....
|
The original topic was how to determine which seminars that would be interesting to attend. I think that Youtube can give me a better feeling if something is interesting enough to spend time and money on than wikipedia. In most cases you can see the teacher in question, not just the style.