I have a question about this. Just because Dan H and Mike Sigman have a common language doesn't mean that they are using the terms to refer to the same things.
Would you say they share a common underlying model and methodology, despite their disagreements? If so, and if they both are at a high level (as some people claim), it seems odd to me that they don't recognize each other's abilities and understanding.
What do you think?
Mike doesn't move anything like me. And from what I hear, we don't teach the same stuff either.
Train with Mike, train with Ark, train With Sam...just go train, listen and feel.