Wow...I thought we had agreed not to do this sort of bulling anymore.
I wouldn't call it "bull" Mary.
Erick is sincere in showing us his diagram.
It may not be applicable anywhere except in his mind, but he has the right to post it over and over to answer a question it doesn't fit.
He may be mistaken, but you shouldn't call it "bulling". I'm sure he means well.
He just needs to test that...analogy, or whatever it is...against reality.
You know Leonard DaVinci made many intricate drawings of various flying machines. Very few of them had any remote chance of actually flying.
But suppose Leo came to the current day and continually posted his flying machine drawings on a board about aerodynamics and aircraft building.
Wouldn't the natural response be, "Prove it"? Build one and let's see it fly?
The problem with Erick's posts is that he not only posts things that the people recognized for IS/IP have told him they're irrelevant, but rather than prove it with a demonstration, he has cast serious aspersions on people like Dan. He has made personal attacks to cover an unworkable theory.
I notice that people who keep walking off cliffs tend to keep getting bumped about.