Thread: "combat"
View Single Post
Old 09-04-2012, 07:06 PM   #9
Chris Evans
Location: Berkeley, CA.
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 169
Smile Re: "combat"

Robert M Watson Jr wrote: View Post
This generalization is generally not true. A very typical approach is remove the immediate threat and move on to the next one until the mission is achieved. No time for dwelling as you described. That would be pathological - not typical.
Ah hah, true, "...would be pathological - not typical..."
Just because an open minded budoka used all the training to strike down an assailant does not mean we'd give into anger for punishment. As a mattter of opinion, most of the combat sports players I know have strong self-control and sense of fairness.

Combat can be a form of protection in action: A "tool" or a word is only as beneficial as the persons' virtue and the conditions of that time.

I can see how aikido isn't just fun, but can enhance an ethical persons' combat capability.

Last edited by Chris Evans : 09-04-2012 at 07:10 PM.

"The state that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting by fools."
  Reply With Quote