And he posts yet another example of argumentum ad hominem.
Plonk time. I've spent way too much time on this. My concern is that there are those who might find his arguments compelling all while he would be laughed out of an lower division logic or philosophy class. Philosophy in general and logic in particular are a heck of a lot more than sounding deep. Much like Aikido, without some substance the outer forms are just that -- an insubstantial shell.
Too much to do, not enough mental energy.
BTW, Graham, the previous sentence is an opening for a final zinger post that I won't even see -- you're welcome!
Bless you. I merely gave a source relevant to my thread. I can give the philosophy of it and practically demonstrate it thank you.
Obviously some here are unaware of this aspect or even perspective.
Maybe you're right, it's too deep.
Must be my fault for understanding it. Ha, ha.