Re: What Is Your Frame Of Reference For Understanding Aikido?
(not wanting to interfere the conversation, but trying to understand)
The statements you make are interesting to some extent....
Do I understand correctly that you object to those that claim their Aikido is effective (martial)? And should back such claims up?
First of all, consider natural selection. Students select teachers, students that look beyond the end of their nose find good teachers and advance, understand. others will not. A teacher with many students does not make him good; that is he might be good at selling Aikido.
Secondly, calling someone's bluff sounds a lot like challenge, competition, fight. This seems contrary to what Morihei believed in.
Thirdly, there is only one test...which is a bit final...which ultimately still does not say anything about someones Aikido understanding/ability...
Could you please explain?