Niall Matthews wrote:
Aiki as something you have isn't normally used in Japanese.
Thank you for pointing this out.
This has bothered me for the some time now.
It is directly related to the incorrect way they use the term aiki.
Maybe it's incorrect in the usual aikido way of explaining aiki, but aikido comes from daito ryu and here is a little of how it was explained there--not as a dynamic of moving around an attacker's movement, but of a force emanating from the aiki man:
From Stan Pranin's "Conversations with Daito Ryu Masters" (p. 95)
During practice (Kodo) Horikawa would apply aiki and keep it applied for minutes on end while he was speaking, so it was pretty rough on his partner!
Yes, because you weren't able to move at all. And gradually, it would become difficult to breathe.""
They're not talking about "applying aiki" by doing tenkan or getting the opponent in an armlock. This is where the opponent grabs or just touches Horikawa and he "emits" aiki force into their bodies as you see on page 97 of the same book. Also, same page of the same book:
He even had aiki in the soles of his feet.""
And on p. 96:
He would send aiki through his fingers...""
So in daito ryu, aiki is something you "have".
It was in aikido that it became something you "do".