View Single Post
Old 05-12-2008, 10:48 PM   #36
JW
 
JW's Avatar
Location: San Francisco CA USA
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 509
Offline
ok then, on to a better idea?

Quote:
Christopher Li wrote: View Post
The problem is not that there are no alternatives for males or whatever group is excluded, the problem is the division itself.
This is a very theoretical point of view, and I could see myself agreeing with this theory. It is a hard-line approach that is easy to defend if you are on the priviledged side of a pre-existing cultural division, such as the cultural division that makes it easy for us males to have so much self-confidence that we can saunter into a dojo and say, "ok sign me up!"
I see what you are saying, but I disagree in cases like this where all around us, some people actively put energy into keeping males in power-- don't we need to actively put energy into stopping this arrangement, if it is to ever end? Anyway I just wanted to explain why I would disagree with something that sounds fine to me in theory. (I not talking affirmative action in dojo enrollment, just supporting a females-only intro class that feeds into regular class)

Quote:
Christopher Li wrote: View Post
Myself, I wouldn't say that the answer to divisiveness is to create more divisions. At least, not unless the circumstances were fairly extreme.
So then, what is the better solution to the masculine dominance in aikido, which evidently has the power to prevent women from signing up (due to the support from a culture that priviledges men)?
--JW

Last edited by JW : 05-12-2008 at 11:00 PM.
  Reply With Quote