Cady Goldfield wrote:
You're talking about "on the mats," between two people of comparable skill-level. Because "on the streets," there is more involved than brute strength and size.
The weaker may beat the stronger with:
- superior strategy and tactics
- superior martial skills
- dumb luck
If this were not so, then the species would have died out a long time ago, I suspect. Homo sapiens sapiens
(modern humans) out-stripped H. sapiens neandertal
(Neanderthal humans) despite compelling evidence that Neanderthals were much larger and stronger than H. sapiens sapiens
, yet possessed comparable intelligence. Why didn't Neanderthals just beat the crap out of Sapiens and steal their wimmin?
We'd all be big, honkin' hybrids today. Frankly, I wouldn't want to think about what this might mean when it comes to hirsuteness for the women...
Cady, is this in response to my post above? If it is you have misunderstood severely. You are actually supporting my point with your post.
It is through superior technical skill etc. that the weaker person is placed in a position where he/she becomes stronger than the physically stronger/larger individual. In this case technical or other strength compensates for lack in size and physical strength. However with this compensation the physically "weaker" in fact becomes stronger than the person who is physically larger/stronger, hence the stronger person always wins.