Mike Sigman wrote:
I've tried to leave reasonable accurate descriptions and how-to's on a lot of these things during *this* tenure on AikiWeb. You'd have to do a search, if you're interested.
I've followed your posts on these topics fairly consistently. I don't think the question posed was unreasonable at all.
Perhaps I missed it, but I have yet to see a post that has an "accurate description" that is expressed in plain english and provides an objective basis for the identification and evaluation of "jin" along empirical rationalist lines of the kind you continually press.
It's really no more than you've asked of anyone else.
If you could point all of us to a post in which you have already answered the question, that would be a big help.