Techniques in themselves don't work
Just recently, after several decades training, I came to understand that techniques in themselves don't work. It looked so trivial and obvious when the thought came up but I guess it depends greatly on the person how fast or slow his grasp is on the art (which then means I am a slow learner :D ). Aikido is such a challenging and daunting art.
If techniques don't work, then what does? |
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
Do you mean to say that techniques don't work in the same way that food recepies don't provide norishment?
|
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
Better situational awareness
Mental composure Avoidance and preemption Principles that make techniques work - work (when applied in a suitable moment) |
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
Techniques work fine if you create the appropriate situation.
Which means that you will already have connection, already have kuzushi, and already have taken control of the attacker's space ... then you can do whatever technique presents itself. Katherine |
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
Quote:
|
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
Quote:
The more I practice (it's not even 20 years) the more I experience that technique teaches me, teaches my body, i.e. it's structure, it's skill to perceive and to be - what we call her - permeable ... It is not the outer shape of technique, but the millions and millions of details lying under the surface of a technique, that teach the practioner and "transform" him over time. (Just to take an example: Standing hanmi. You can stand in hanmi and nothing happens. It might look "correct", but it doesn't "do" anythink. It doesn't "work". And you can learn to stand "correct" in hanmi and suddenly you are doing "sort of qi gong" without even understanding it at first. The differences are very, very small. I sometimes don't see the corrections of my teacher with my eyes, but only feel them with my body. And this has enourmous effects you come to notice. So isnt't this the technique in itself, that works?) So in my understanding it is just and "only" technique that works. But I think we may call different "things" technique? |
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
Quote:
The more years or decades you train in the art, the higher the probability you can make the techniques work on a large number of people but that does not mean you understand the art. There must be more fundamental than "technique" that needs to be understood if ever one is to progress significantly. |
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
Quote:
I would like to know how you arrive at your conclusion here. I find your statement to be for me somewhat confusing.A technique either works or it does not.A technique is just like a menu for baking a cake.Get the right ingredients, the right quantities , mix them up in the prescribed manner, cook the stuff at the right temp.and the result should be a cake.No magic or some mystical process.Just a matter of taking basic aikido principles , putting them into practice correctly.Result-the waza works!!If not go back to the drawing board.To answer your last point, if Aikido doesnt work use a baseball bat[Joking of course]. Cheers, Joe |
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
Quote:
For me, in my training now, I don't focus on the technique itself but rather the underlying fundamentals that make up that technique. The pursuit for me now is not how techniques will work but rather seeking those fundamentals that work that make a technique work. I only know a handful that are tried and proven. A technique's external form maybe similar when done by different people but its effectiveness varies. |
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
continuing from my post above, consider a very simple example
Tai no henko is the most basic exercise we have yet it is the most often unused and misunderstood IMHO. Tai no henko is one of the underlying principles to initiate connection, break uke's kuzushi, initiate wrist escapes or draw uke towards nage. Not only is it an exercise but it is also used for techniques but this is not known to many I practiced with. I think not many people know how tai no henko is properly used. We only think of it as the first exercise we do after completing warm-up yet it is one of the most important fundamentals when doing a lot of techniques. Leave out this aspect and you won't be able to do the technique properly. |
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
Quote:
In my understanding and also my experience this is just, what technique is about. That's why learning technique is so very difficult and has to be so precise. It is due to "correct" technique that you can handle people who are stronger or bigger. And that you can rely on the technique whoever is your partner. This video points in the direction I am thinking of. Quote:
Technique means to organize one's own body in a certain way, I think. This are just my thoughts. With not having decades of practice in me, but only few years. |
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
Agreed. Techniques on its own doesn't work. Generally it does of course, but it's not the end you are looking for.
I would hazard... You seek power of Aikido. Behind it is the principles that operate in and out of a technique. Understanding that and applying it is what works... Until of course you reach another level. Of course my decade to your several means little... |
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
I agree with you that techniques in and of themselves don't work. Controlling the body and core of the person is what allows techniques to work. I think that you are also correct in your observations that different body shapes, sizes, age, abilities plays into things. The more we practice the more we gain in our intuitive understanding of how these things affect the situation. How I deal with a small person differs from how I deal with a large person.
|
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
The best analogy I've ever been able to come up with is to compare it to learning to dance. You can put the little cut-out footprint things on the floor and work out the choreography. And you can train and train on those particular steps and movements. But at some point the choreography needs to "go away" leaving behind someone who is "dancing" and not just doing the movements.
Same for me in playing music. I have a classical piano background. And there is a difference between playing the notes to the third movement of the Moonlight Sonata, and *really* playing the third movement... One is a performance of the notes Beethoven wrote. The latter is creating music through the notes Beethoven wrote. So I see techniques as being like choreography or notes on a piece of paper. They are ways to get ourselves in to a place where we can begin to really express the art. The technique itself as a teaching device that hopefully allows us to periodically glimpse that which transcends the choreography. |
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
Basically speaking, nothing works well without Aiki.
-Yukiyoshi Sagawa Which makes sense to me, you can do a paint by the numbers picture (are those around anymore?), but that doesn't make you a painter - not even a good one. And painting by the numbers seems unlikely, IMO, to ever teach you much of anything about painting. Shioda would say that even if you do a technique perfectly once, if you do it the same way a second time it won't work. So what needs to link the first and the second time? Best, Chris |
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
Quote:
If duruing a drill, and I want them to carry on then I point out they are stuck in the past and have them carry on. Fear can take you out of now but so can 'that perfect one'. Hence every moment is new. Regards.G. |
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
Quote:
Endo shihan also said "From chaos, we deal with each individual shape. Then return to chaos. If not, then you are trapped in the forms." It is only now that I began to understand this. Aikido is a challenging and daunting art in the sense that when you deal with different shapes and sizes, your technique doesn't work all the time. How do you make it work all the time? In training, you basically deal with chaos. But underneath all this seemingly chaotic environment, there are basic underlying systematic and common principles that apply to every individual. Over time they will get revealed to us one by one. You may have understood the external form of the technique but you really havn't understood the principles that govern the technique as to why it works. These common threads in techniques are what we should be searching for IMO, much more important than how to make the technique work. But the challenge is the search for these and how to prove them. Focusing just on technique, you will get trapped in the forms. |
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
Quote:
It is my experience that every technique, every waza has an essence, a certain substance. If you find this essence of a waza and adapt it to your own body, feelings, character, you can bring the waza to life. But still the waza is independent of you. It still exists without you. I don't like the term "principle". Because I think what waza teaches is much more concrete and detailed than what I think, a principle is. |
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
Quote:
Quote:
Dan |
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
Quote:
I'm just starting to search, to look for it. But I am deeply convinced that this can be learned, can be taught, can be explained? It is not arbitrary, it's not magic, it's not fake. It must be something down to earth. Even it is something very deep. Thank you for answering. While I'm trying to find words to answer you, I note that I contradict myself. You are right: A waza like shiho nage or something like that doesn't exist in itself. Question: Are those waza more "typical situations" than "techniques"? You are right: The essence is what is happening in the body. Question: Isn't this also "technique"? Ah, and there are not some different techniques in the body, but only one? And this one thing does it all? questions questions |
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
I just posted my thoughts here - post #5:
http://www.aikiweb.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20839 |
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
How much time did Ueshiba Sensei spend teaching waza?
For that matter, how much time do most shihan-level instructors spend on it? Waza is not aikido any more than memorizing the dictionary is English. Katherine |
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
Quote:
And even when we practice a certain waza, it's not the waza itself, we focus on, but allways some detail that can be found everywhere and doesn't point in the direction of this certain waza, but is important universally. Not easy to describe. But the nameable waza are more kind of "occasion" to study something deeper, than the aim of the study. |
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
Yes agreed.
People and principles work. The technique is only their expression. |
Re: Techniques in themselves don't work
Quote:
Also, the teacher maybe teaching the principles in class, but the student is focusing on something else. It is for the student to discern what the teacher is ACTUALLY teaching. There's always this type of "miscommunication" happening during classes that the gist of the lesson is entirely missed. So you always have to ask yourself "What is he actually teaching?" It's easy to get distracted trying to mimic the technique or criticizing it, like I do myself. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:19 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.