Metaphors
(Carried over from the thread on sport in order to not degrade the discussion topic there)
Quote:
Related to "Reiki"? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
In terms of the intermingling of reality and relious metaphor, I always like this bit from the first interview of Koichi Tohei on Aikido Journal: Quote:
In the Chinese views, from which much of the basic pattern is borrowed by the Japanese, it gets worse. The further I progress in these things, the more suspicious I am that the whole ki, acupuncture, TCM, qigong, etc., paradigm is essentially what the Chinese cosmology is based on. Previously I thought there were some unusual and telling cross-overs, but as the number of these has grown over the years I'm being forced to take a different perspective. Generally what I'm saying is that too many of these discussions, in both Japanese and Chinese, are not what they superficially seem(ed) to be. FWIW Mike Sigman |
Re: Metaphors
Quote:
intriguing subject, I hope I am not misunderstanding you. In historical discussions here, it sometimes strikes me that there seems to be a notion that religious metaphor and practical advice are domains that can be separated for the historical topics discussed. Of course for us, that is the case, but I am not so sure it was for the historical figures. So when you say he was "honestly" talking about the gods, do you mean there was such separation in his own mind, or from our point of view in retrospect? If so, what makes you think that, in Ueshiba's world, there existed a division between practical IS training and religious metaphor? I am not asking this as a loaded or rhethorical question, btw. One coudl argue that Tohei was just a later generation with a different (modernised) upbringing and cosmology. In a similar vein, of course there is a philosophical position that metaphor (for some: should) be "reduced" to reality - there is also a strong argument, I find, that metaphor cannot always be reduced in such manner, that there are "absolute" metaphors (I take this from German philosopher Hans Blumenberg), and that philosophy and the history of science themeselves are full of important root metaphors (like "reading" nature, or the like). Especially in relation to the experience of the body, I would tend to think myself that metaphor is irreducible. (Recently it was pointed out to me that a lot of body metaphors are apparently the result of synaesthesia, which again would be a facinating, different line of inquiry). Just some points to start a discussion on a topic I find interesting - again, maybe based on a misunderstanding of the gist of your initial argument. |
Re: Metaphors
Quote:
I think Ueshiba was talking about the gods, IS, social structure, ethics, everything you coud imagine, at the same time for there was not (in his views) a real difference. He was not using analogies but identities. |
Re: Metaphors
Quote:
I found out that the body when trained correctly behaves along the lines of the "flow" diagrams in acupuncture/TCM.... coincidence? I think not. And there a more areas that accumulate and seem to solidify the idea that much of the things that appear to be the work of the vivid imagination of Taoist sages actually turn out to be totally in line with some real and demonstrable physical phenomena. The coincidence-after-the-fact idea crumbles under the weight. What I think is that body-development along the practical physical qi/ki/prana/kokyu/shakti/jin lines could have long agao had a religious significance that was carried forward traditionally. So there would always have been an intermingling of religion and physical effect. It needs looking into because there's too much overlap for it all to just be coincidence. FWIW Mike Sigman |
Re: Metaphors
don't know a whole lot about japanese, but asian in general, tends to use lots of metaphor in their normal communication. reminded me of a star trek episode where capt picard and crew encountered an alien race whose language is pure metaphor. the translator couldn't translate.
if you look at the name of the taiji form sequence, then you have things like "Buddha's warrior pounds mortar", "Jade maiden working her loom", "white crane spread wings" and so on (why couldn't aikido techniques have names like that, since ikkyo, nikkyo,...etc are kinda boring). who would have thought those describe movements of a form? now if you put those sort of things into bad, non rhyme poems, then you got a bunch of doka that talked about god, kami and so on and so forth. bloody confusing! which got folks who really want to believe in things interpret as loving and harmony, when he could have discuss about how to pound you into the pavement and make you one with the earth. |
Re: Metaphors
Quote:
2 cents. Mike |
Re: Metaphors
Quote:
Quote:
In such a view, it all got muddled with the cross-cultural translations into a new ("modern", "western", "scientific") paradigm, which introduced the distinctions we make between religion and physics in the first place. And dropped some things as "daoist phantasies" that were not. And we (or rather, people like you) are still clearing up the resulting mess and trying to get some order.... But maybe that's semantics for historians and social anthropologists my 2 cent |
Re: Metaphors
Quote:
In the West we're used to their being some sort of disconnect between 'religious belief' and the day-to-day world. If this thesis about some practical inceptions to the Yin-Yang cosmology holds up, it might easily have gotten past westerners because they conceive of religious/metaphysical belief as divorced from day-to-day reality and their inclination, as Phi points out, would be to take "become one with your opponent" metaphorically instead of as a practical description. ;) FWIW Mike |
Re: Metaphors
Perhaps we are all just doing the best we can to express our thoughts in what they are to us, what they are like, and what they are not.
IMHO, just because they do or don't match someone elses expression doesn't mean they are right/wrong, good or bad. That is one of the limits of language and communication. What I hear someone say gets translated into my langauge and the meanings may not match. Happens all the time. Now add different cultures, language, religion, and time and the understanding and translation become harder. But many are trying to understand and get an accurate translation and understanding of what O'Sensei possibly meant. Until then we will continue to miscomunicate and misunderstand, but continue the training and the journey. Seldom are thing what they superficially seem, but sometimes they are. Wisdom/serenity is knowing the difference. FWIW |
Re: Metaphors
Quote:
"Temba, his arms wide." >"Shaka, when the walls fell." phi, the walls won't fall. |
Re: Metaphors
Quote:
I can accept synaestesia in this context. I was in a bit of a hot argument recently when someone attributed Ueshiba's performance to brain damage and his "visions" to synaesthesia. But I was considering synaesthesia (which I believe we Yanks spell synesthesia) recently in the context of distinguishing ki from mind. I think what's happened in the West is that we believe that mind comprises all unseeable and unmeasurable qualities of the human body. You can't see the nerve impulses, but you can measure them. You can image what you can't open physically while the body lives. But anything you can't see or measure, such as thoughts or the movement of ki, is classified as "mental" activity. My "breakthrough" was in recognizing that mistake first. Just as all "mental" activity is not "calculation," all invisible human vitality is not necessarily "mental". It is because ki clings so closely to mind that we have never been able to distinguish it. If I have a contribution to science greater than the filing of papers and the proper addressing of e-mails, it would be to stimulate a new context of consideration of ki so that neurologists and psychologists, psychiatrists and general practitioners would have a rational way of relating to it. And I think that non-metaphorical context would be that "mind" has been over-identified to include non-mental functions of the body. In other words, take all the known functions of the body and re-classify which are the result of "mental" powers and which are the result of another kind of agent that works almost inseparably with the mind to operate some functions independently and other functions at the suggestion of the mind. In other words, convince science to conceive that the "eye" of the mind looks through a lens—and that this lens is what the Japanese call ki and the Chinese call qi. As to synaesthesia, well, we're "looking" at an invisible idea through the "eye" of the mind, which has so far failed to recognize that it is "seeing" through a lens. I made the comparison of trying to smell with the eyes or see with the nose. Of course, these things are actually the opposite of synaesthesia--confounding of one sense for another. And the activity and reality of ki has been overlooked by science because science has so far confounded the actions and effects of ki with those of the mind, so they have failed to see this fine distinction, that the ki is really more physical than mind.... So that's the big hike I'm now undertaking. I want science to recognize that this marginal transitional quality between mind and body does exist and that it bears tremendous import for every medical and social science. Now, if we can understand all the factors involved and use the ki in the right relation to the mind and the body, I think we can experience a sort of blending of the senses of the mind and the ki into an awareness much broader than current "thinking" allows. Best to you and all and again, especially to Mike Sigman for so much delineation of structure, function, intent and awareness over the years. David |
Re: Metaphors
Quote:
Lately, I'm working with the image of a cat that lives inside us. And then I thought, maybe the ancient Chinese were really just describing a feeling you could recognize and would understand in the same way when you had felt it. "Parting the wild horse's mane." "Grasping bird's tail" "Step back and repulse monkey". Maybe these describe real feelings that arise in the human body when they move their qi as required for the movement....? Well...that's probably taking it too far. But I think we're pretty safe with saying those names were related to the namers' feelings about their world and what they were doing. Best to all. David |
Re: Metaphors
Quote:
I think really well-developed ki can manage even better than that. But it still may not work agete on that grip of yours! Quote:
David |
Re: Metaphors
Quote:
|
Re: Metaphors
Quote:
It is funny you two mentioned that aspect of Ki and Ushiro Sensei. When I first met Ushiro Sensei back at the first Expo, we instantly bonded despite not speaking each other's language. Our families are still close to one another to this day and we talk to others frequently about how our ki created a connection that continues to grow today. If you are interested in meeting Ushiro Sensei in Osaka, pm me and I will arrange for you to be able to attend one of the open seminars. Regards, Marc Abrams |
Re: Metaphors
Quote:
Quote:
Relavent to the discussion, too. I had a long post typed, but lost it. I believe westerners use methaphor in language alot more than we think, but it's masked by the common cultural context we share. I think almost any group with a common interest will develop a shorthand language to discuss their interest. Scientists are do this formally, but you see it in virtually any group with a common interest - from techies to trekies to Harry Potter fans to evangelical christians. In any of these situations, the specific meaning of terms is not transparent to those outside the group. Former Governor Mike Huckabee's speeches may be a good parallel to the current discussion. I recall a poll where most people had only the most general understanding of what he was saying, but evangelicals heard a whole overlay of christian imagery in his speeches. Pat |
Re: Metaphors
Quote:
Mike |
Re: Metaphors
Quote:
I remember watching that episode and thinking, "how the hell can he be so sure he's understanding the meaning? It's too damned vague!!!" I mean, what if the walls were the one's built by Pink Floyd? That would be good wouldn't it? Or if they're the ones that protected people from the Golden Horde? That'd be bad! ...But that's why I'm not Captain of the Enterprise. :D I recall learning about one or two of the Catholic saints (Aquinas?) who essentially espoused a mystical view of spirituality, that one can commune with spirit (whatever that may be) directly. Ever since then, I've been drawn to the concept of mysticism because it seems to take root in a direct approach for application. After learning something about Natural Religion, I came to feel even more comfortable with mystical language. Natural religions/philosophies tend to be "old" and based on a time when people seemed to look at the world around them, notice something, and then seek to describe it to the best of their knowledge. It might've been somewhat more intuition-based, but it wasn't exactly less intelligent than what people today express. In many regards you might say they had less distractions than most people have today. Quote:
|
Re: Metaphors
Quote:
|
Re: Metaphors
Quote:
|
Re: Metaphors
Quote:
Pat |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:56 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.