Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
First of all I'm a difficult uke- means I resist too much and unnecessary. I get hurt because of that, my body is permanently bruised plus I'm clumsy and not skilled enough to perform that so-much-desired flow. It absolutely doesn't mean my teachers are bad-they are awesome, it's just me (unfortunately). I may not be right, but I have my own reasons to resist and I'm paying for that with all that physical pain.
So, during all my time in the dojo I got comments such as I was speaking too much, I was not skilled enough to train with (black belt more preferred), I resisted too much, etc…There is some truth in all of that, but hey, you are my friends, guys! Ok, you got the picture of me… My question though is if it's acceptable to follow "Eye for Eye" rule in Aikido training? In this case it's more like blow for blow. I was doing suwariwaza with one of our black belts and tried to give him a little bit of hard time to make him work. Sometimes, when I see my partner is open, I can give him/her an atemi as a reminder to move to protect one-self or to keep a block. It is never a serious full strength atemi, more like a very light punch or kick or in most cases there is just pretence of it. Everybody does it, everyone accepts it, but not with that guy. I don't know his reasons, but he likes to follow "eye for eye" or as I mentioned earlier blow for blow rule. Every time I train with him he returns whatever I did to him in the way that feels like punishment. Whenever I twist his wrist or punch or kick or throw him he repeats it on me, but with more power than it's necessary as if teaching me a lesson "you got what you asked for". So, we were doing suwariwaza and while I was falling on my back I managed to kick his upper body side, but nothing serious of course. Well, when it was my turn to be nage I was struggling a lot as he was resisting (in the end he is a good black belt and more skillful than me). When I tried to throw him away he kicked me as I did earlier, but his kick was much more powerful so I ended up in a foot or so away from my previous place. I don't know if he aimed or not, but he kicked me exactly in the center of my chest-a few inches left or right or down and it could be pretty bad for me as a female. I finished my round and went to the locker room to wash my hands and cool myself down. And then it hit me, my so- nourished self-pity: was it necessary for him to do that to me? Do I really deserve such attitude? Should not we be above vengeance? I could not control it, so I got some tears (just a little bit). Is he right? Should I be completely submissive as uke? Should I just follow the rules and never challenge the opponent? I'm a very optimistic person and can take criticism well, so whenever I complain about my injures it's always a joke (but outsiders seriously think that my husband abuses me on a regular base). Yulia |
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
I have a sempai exactly like you. I am shameful to admit that I sometimes do the "Blow for Blow" thing.
Bear in mind that it's extremely easy for uke to strike nage and find "openings" when the technique is done slow. Are you doing this at full speed? Also remember that wherever you can hit nage, he can hit you. (Generally speaking) You don't always need to point out an area where you can kick/punch, because odds are nage has already seen it first and is not doing it because you are in regulated dojo practice. :) |
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
I dont know how hard he hits and how hard you hit. Its hard to convey that in writing. But offhand it seems to me that this is all standard practice for some sempai and as long as no teeth are lost and you can walk away from it, its not a problem. I have sempai who have done something similar to me when I threw them hard; one sempai then came back at me with the hardest irimi nage ive ever felt. But no biggie. Its fine.
But I don't indicate openings to my sempai with atemi, because they don't leave a lot of openings and frankly if i were to make a standard practice of that, I have a lot more openings and i am sure they could make life much more difficult for me if they chose. So that is a can of worms i will not open (unless the sempai in question is senior only in name, not in waza--but thats a different story.) My feeling is, you upped the ante on your sempai and it's your sempai's job to show you that you cannot just up the ante like that and not be willing to take some grief in return. I dont mean it would be okay to do you some damage, though. Just a reminder. Just how emphatic the reminder should be, though, could be open to discussion. |
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
So it is ok for you to punch, kick, etc, but not ok for him too?
I'm not sure I understand the rules in your dojo.... |
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
Is there some rule in your dojo against comunicating? For example, after you traded kicks with your sempai why don't you ask them what they are trying to communicate? Be sure you can answer the question of what you are trying to communicate. Because it seems you are starting a lot of this.
BTW - if you were in my dojo I would tell you that you are overstepping your bounds and cut it out now. You are assuming you know more that your senior partners and the sensei in charge of the class. While that may or may not be true, that assumption is not appropriate in a dojo. (I assume it is not because you are the one getting beat up.) |
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
The problem might be communication. You need to let him know that you'll be doing that, and that you'll go easy if he goes easy, and you can both learn.
But if you're practicing something your sensei demonstrated, then do it how it was demonstrated. |
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
Quote:
|
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
Janet made a beautifully succinct point, why should there be different rules?
Quote:
Trying to be a smart-arse is fun and I fully recommend it (at the appropriate time and with the appropriate training partner of course), but the flip side is it often hurts and as the old joke goes "It hurts when I do this - well don't do it then". |
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
Well
For what it is worth here is my ten pence. I would not say that it is not an eye for and eye really. You did it to him to show there was an opening there, and he told you well smarty pants you have the same opening. You know sometime what is fine for one is not fine for another person. Sometime a kick or punch works much better than expected. I just punched a girl in the breast yesterday. It was supposed to be to ribs but she dropped down moving her hips away. (I ain relatively high not to get the floating ribs) So instead of stopping in time, she got a fair wack. When you throw punch and kick things like that will happen. That is the way it is. Or he is just an arse and sees that as a challenge on his authority, knowledge or seniority, or he was having a bad day. It is a bit like the saying you can laugh about anything but not with every one. In any case if you can not take it back, you better not dish it out. In your case, i think you could discuss that with him, so that he know that you are not being awkward on purpose and you should be able to workout something together. Like being compliant in the first few technique so that both of you can study the move and when it is your turn then tell him that you wish him to resist a bit more (and that it is not a reason to let loose the hounds of war and snot you nose in the rice canvas) One things bear in mind as well, is that sometime techniques are used to support an exercise and in such case they may not be 100% functional. phil |
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
Our dojo talks about 'respecting grade' and - in a sense - that means I can point out weaknesses in a way that a Dan grade shouldn't.
That doesn't mean that they let us get away with something, but I've never needed to be kicked to have the point made. I'm a complete Aikido newbie, but as a human being it sounds like this guy just needs to grow up. |
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
Quote:
Open up, listen to the feedback you are being given, Train in a way that they benefit from training with you. Being a good uke is harder than being a good tori/nage. |
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
I wonder how much "opening atemi" would have to be exchanged between uke and nage before it turns into genuine brawling? :D
|
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
Quote:
If you want to show "openings" jump out of Kihon Waza training, set up and use live training environments (e.g. "Okay, you come in with anything, and you be ready for anything."). Not to be rude, but can I ask if you train in live training environments? My reason for asking is that my experience has led me to hold that folks that try and make Kihon Waza training the answer to all things martial are folks that have little to none when it comes to other forms of training. If this captures your experience, perhaps then you won't find it so crazy to be "submissive" in Kihon Waza training if you also find some avenues for more live training environments - but be aware, you are most likely going to get hurt, and hurt bad (where a kick in the torso or the breast has to be the least of your worries). Finally, I'm feeling you should look more closely at your reaction to your senpai's reaction, looking past "He did it to me," "He's the one to blame," "Isn't he wrong - aren't I right." There's a lot of "victimentality" in there, and that always speaks of egocentricism, and egocentrism always speaks of a loss of awareness, and a loss of awareness always leads to more ignorance, and more ignorance always leads to more suffering. The mat is a microcosm of Life and behind all this current suffering in the dojo lies a loss of insight regarding what an uke is, what openings are, what kihon waza is, where the learning allowances are in your training, how to improve at nage, how to improve at uke, how and why people are reacting to your showing of openings, why you feel a need to show people their openings, why you really teared up in the bathroom, etc. In my dojo, we get newer folks that come in sometimes wanting to expose openings. It usually last for about one or two reps, as we give them plenty of reason to better spend their time learning ukemi - which is the same reason for not wanting to waste time showing openings in Kihon Waza. In Kihon Waza, everyone just works on as much of the form as they can. I, as sensei, go around telling folks where they have departed from the form and thus where they have openings. This is the fastest way of learning, as this interrupts the accumulation of repetitions the least. That is enough at our dojo for someone to correct themselves and to return to the form as best they can. When folks are "fighting" in Kihon Waza, I might have to ask them what they are doing, as someone might ask a crazy person that is talking to invisible folks, "Who are you talking to?," as it is a complete misunderstanding, as they could have just broke out a checker board right then and there and been as close to Aikido Kihon Waza training as when "fighting." It doesn't take much to keep folks on the path, in other words, at our dojo. I feel that this has everything to do with the fact that we do not just do kihon waza training (and a little crazy thing called "randori" - geesh). Because we have live training environments where you are sure to get your "Aikido" handed back to you, in not so nice a way, if it is not up to par, everyone takes Kihon Waza training very seriously as the type of training wherein you are set to learning correct technique by embodying it over and over and over and over and over and over again. Thus, in the end, most of my senpai also have no problem outright telling a beginning, "Don't waste your reps, there's plenty to learn here in Kihon Waza training. Relax, stop fighting, there is plenty of time for that later, and if you don't train now in technique, you are not going to be ready later for fighting training." Things never have to go beyond this. fwiw, dmv |
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
Quote:
I think what it all means in your case depends a lot on whether from their point of view they're happily and enthousiastically accepting your 'invitation' to train with more atemi (in which case you could always just ask them to hit a bit less hard), or whether they're pissed off and trying to tell you that you're being a s***t and they _don't_ want to train your preferred way (in which case you might try respecting their wishes). |
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
First off, I am a big fan of solid ukewaza, and I do believe in atemi. Next, I differentiate instruction between exercising, learning, and training. When I am learning aikido, I usually do not appreciate a "difficult" uke; I wish to learn in an evironment with controlled variables and a reproduceable conclusion. When I train aikido, I enjoy a smart uke who is invited to interact with me at the level at which they wish to invite me to interact with them. If I choose to employ atemi, I must prepare to receive atemi. If I choose to attempt to refute or reverse technique, I must prepare to receive kaishiwaza.
That said, I when I work with my partner: A. Am I learning or training with my partner? B. At what level do I wish to interact with my partner? |
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
While I would never presume to tell my sempai they are leaving openings unless they ask,and Nevr make contact with atemi when that happens, I do understand where you're coming from.
The other night we were practicing katatedori nikyo. My partner was a pretty big guy and I am under 5'3" and weigh proportionate.There is no way I can budge this guy unless my technique is perfect. So he's resisting and I find the sweet spot and he goes down , hard. We trade. I grab his wrist, he tries the technique, nothing happens. So he muscles me into a nikyo and down I go. He says I was resisting just as hard as he was. Yeah, right. Like I'd resist a steamroller! Considering I outrank this guy by threee belts, I was well within my rights to correct his assumption, but since the reason I train is to Not be contentious, and I like all my partners, we just let it go and kept on training. Sometimes I manage to not turn everything into an argument! |
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
Did you read Erick Calderon's blog? Apparently, somebody enjoys training with you!
It's all a matter of personality. We get along with some, and not with others. Still, I would try not to brush a sempai the wrong way. He may have his own issues that you do not know about, just the same as you may have your own issues, that he doesn't know about. Just let go, he will one day meet someone who will be able to help him with his problems. You just keep training and make the day of those who appreciate you. |
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
You wouldn't seriously expect him to turn the other cheek? Or the other rib in this case. Don't throw stones at others if your house is built of glass, and don't show others their openings if your techniques are full of them :D Anyway, you got what you deserve.
|
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You may not like bruises now, but will you like broken bones later? I've had instances in the past of students coming onto the mat (typically they have past martial arts experience of some sort) and trying as hard as they possibly can to break my technique or to screw with me since I'm a shodan. They want me to help them learn Aikido, while they disrupt my training? I have plenty to work on without their help, thanks. This type of behavior used to really upset me, to the point of me getting violent, or at the very least avoiding the person. One example is a partner I trained with on shomenuchi ikkyo. This was not my first run-in with this individual. He was bound and determined to not let me do ikkyo him, to the point of tightening his arm completely (after his non-committed, choked-up strike), bringing his arm to his side, and turning his back on me. I hit him lightly several times to make the point about atemi about him being wide open and badly positioned... and he just laughed loudly at me and said something mocking in response. I was really pissed and took him down in a headlock. I needed to step off the mat to regroup, and I never worked with that person again. I was concerned for my emotional training, as well as concerned for his health - his attitude was something that I couldn't answer, at that point, even if his technique was appalling. It is fortunate, at times like that, that I don't know how to hit very effectively... :) Currently, I have a more effective way of dealing with these problems. I do whatever technique I can make work while trying hard not to hurt the person. Sure, neither of us get to practice what sensei is teaching, but did uke really care about that in the first place, if they are being so problematic? As for me, it is just another lesson in blending.. :) If I can't make anything work on the person, than I just don't do anything. It is what they wanted after all, isn't it? That way, they learn nothing, and I get to practice patience. Rob |
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
I like David Valdez's answer
|
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
Quote:
William Hazen |
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
Quote:
In aikido there is some interesting spiritual notion "Restore harmony of the World' . We start to learn about it physically in the dojo first. So you experience is very precious, it lets you learn the most important aspect of aikido. Be grateful to your black belt fellow. If aikido practice is not well balanced, in absence of very clear rules of practice, it will be not possible to practice safely. And abuse will be a norm. So I’d say : yes, your fellow student does very good thing. Still you can ‘challenge’ any student you want, make counters etc…I do it regularly, however I’m very careful to have very clear good intent, maintain good, pleasant mood of practice, and remember old saying from Himalaya: “always do it at the level you can receive it safely”. Otherwise you will destroy you body for nothing; you will learn nothing at all. Be courageous and wish you a lot of health. |
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
To me saying "eye for an eye" implies that you first took an "eye" or in this case a you gave a blow first. So the first offence was done by you and also this would be a bad thing in Aikido acording to what I think you believe to be the rules in Aikido.
I think you can still do this kind of training if you like but you need to ask your uke if he agrees, if you dont he might take it the wrong way. I remember not so long ago I had a sempai that did something like that (resisting and giving atemis in openings) but since I was was trying to concentrate on what i should do, the atemis totally broke my concentration and annoyed me. Now I know why he did them, I think we all go through that fase of resisting to see if it works or something like that. Where I train when I have done that to my sensei (he is a good friend and he knows i am just playing with him) he just smiles and the next time I try to do it he shows me that he was just taking it easy on me and that the opening was there because they didnt want to go overboard. |
Re: Eye for Eye, Blow for Blow?
An eye for an eye.. makes the whole world blind....
-- Mohandus Ghandi |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:18 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.