11-03-2004, 10:40 AM
This found its way into my email inbox. I thought I'd post it to see if anyone had anything to add.
p.s. It's pretty long.
By Jonathan V. Wright, M.D.
You've taken supplements for years. You're out of vitamins C and E. You go to your natural food store, but you can't find the kind you want on the shelf. You ask a clerk to find them for you. She says you can't get your vitamin E as mixed tocopherols (the best natural form) anymore, and asks if you like your vitamin C in the 100- or 200-milligram size. The 1,000-milligram size, you say.
"Where have you been?" she asks. "Asleep since 2004? It's 2007 now! The types and sizes of vitamins you just asked for have been declared illegal by the Dispute Settlement Body of the World Trade Organization!"
"Wait!" you reply. "This is America! Our president says we're fighting for American freedom -- and you're telling me that the World Trade Organization can dictate what size vitamin C I can take, and forbid me from taking mixed tocopherols?" The sales clerk sighs, and reaches for a piece of paper. "It's a little complicated," she says. "A few years back, the European Commission passed the European Food Supplements Directive ... "
You feel your blood pressure rising. "What does the European Commission and its directive have to do with me? If Europeans want bureaucrats to tell them what to do, that's their business. I'm a free citizen of these United States!"
"Now, now, dear, your blood pressure will go up, and you can't get calcium citrate, magnesium aspartate, CoQ10 or L-arginine or anything else natural to help regulate it anymore."
"What? This goes beyond the FDA's wildest dreams!"
"That's not a 10th of it, dear. While you were distracted by the war overseas for American freedom, here at home we lost our right to buy any amino acids at all. No arginine, no carnitine, no tryptophan, nothing. I can't sell you any essential fatty acids either. No DHA or EPA. And no beta-carotene, no mixed carotenoids, no MSM, no boron ... The list goes on and on."
"So what can I buy?" you ask. "Let's see ... those 100- and 200-milligram vitamin Cs. Vitamin B6 maximum 4.2 milligrams, vitamin B1, 2.4 milligrams. Oh, here's a better one: You can get niacin at 32 milligrams."
"Enough! I'm getting sick! How did this ever happen in these United States?"
"As I was saying, the European Directive ... ."
"I heard you. But what about America's Congress, America's President?"
"Oh, they signed us up for this in the 1990s, when they made us members of the World Trade Organization. According to the Congressional Research Service: 'As a member of the World Trade Organization, the United States does commit to act in accordance with the rules of the multilateral body. The United States is legally obligated to ensure national laws do not conflict with World Trade Organization rules.'"
"Our President and Congress send troops overseas to fight for freedom, but let the WTO tell us what to do with our vitamins? There must be something we can do."
"Actually, we did have a chance or two to reverse this in 2004, but it's going to be incredibly difficult now."
"But I really need my mixed tocopherol vitamin E. And my mother with congestive heart failure depends on CoQ10."
"I'm not unsympathetic, especially to your poor mother, dear." She looks all around, then lowers her voice. "I can give you some sources downtown." She whispers a few names. "But those people deal dangerous drugs! Now they're selling vitamins, too?"
"That's freedom in America in 2007, dear."
Think it can't happen? Think again.
A Nightmare Come True
The FDA's wildest dream -- and our worst nightmare -- is about to come true. Two years ago, I told you about the passage of the European Union (EU) Directive on Dietary Supplements. This directive, which is part of a larger form of legislation called Codex Alimentarius, severely restricts access to natural health products in Europe. At the time, it probably seemed a long way off. After all, the law wasn't to go into effect for several years following the initial passage.
Unfortunately, that several years is up, and the EU Directive is on track to take full effect in August 2005 -- less than a year from now -- and by 2007, the scene described above will certainly be a reality for many, many people.
Obviously, this is devastating news for Europe. But thanks to some pre-existing international agreements made by the United States, the EU Directive will be just as devastating for the natural health community here. The main difference is that while the directive has been big news in Europe for some time, it's been virtually ignored by U.S. media, which means that the severe restrictions it calls for will sneak up on most people and rob us all of our freedom to choose natural alternatives before we even know what's happening.
That's why I and many of my colleagues in the health publishing world have done our best to keep you informed of the directive's developments -- and their consequences for the United States -- over the years.
Simply put, we're down to the wire, and if we don't act immediately, we will be facing the same fate as Europeans. There are steps you can take to get the word out and, hopefully, to diffuse this ticking time bomb. But first, let's take a few minutes and recount some of the specifics included in the directive so that you know exactly what it is we're fighting against.
5,000 Products Set to Disappear
The EU Directive classifies vitamins and minerals in Europe as "medical drugs" rather than dietary supplements, which means that they're subject to government regulation in terms of dosage and availability.
It gets worse: There are many nutrients known to be vital to optimal health that are not on the government's RDA nutrient list including chromium picolinate, lysine, and selenium. Under the directive, these types of supplements are banned from over-the-counter sale. Put simply, it will be illegal to buy them without a prescription.
The supplements that will be available will be restricted to multi-vitamins containing no more than 100 percent of the established RDA amounts, which are usually useless, trivial quantities -- and they'll be far more expensive than what we have now.
This directive, for all intents and purposes, makes it illegal for people to keep themselves healthy by supplementing with essential nutrients.
Plus, the directive only allows supplements to be made from a list of 15 minerals and 13 vitamins. That leaves out at least 40 minerals important to the human metabolism and forbids the use of the most bio-available forms of vitamin complexes. In essence, it means that all nutritional supplements will be virtually the same. The specific combinations might vary, but the types and amounts of nutrients will be identical, no matter what product they're formulated into.
So, for instance, a middle-aged woman in Liverpool, England, who has a dangerously elevated homocysteine level will no longer have the option of reducing her risk of heart disease with a vitamin B dosage of her own choosing. If she's currently taking 5 mg of folic acid daily, under the new directive, she will be legally restricted to a prescription of 1 mg per day.
If she's taking a 100-mg dose of B6, she'll be restricted to 10 mg. And her pantothenic acid (B5) intake of 500 mg will drop to 200 mg. These maximum dosage levels have been chosen to "protect" her (so we're told), when, in fact, the protection she needs the most will be unavailable.
In addition to these essential B vitamins, low maximum dosage levels have also been set for vitamin C, niacin and vitamin E. But at least they made it on the list of allowed nutrients.
Approximately 350 supplement ingredients are missing from the list. If they are not added to the list by June 2005, they will be deemed illegal throughout the European Union. Supplement manufacturers may submit "technical dossiers" to support applications for the inclusion of individual elements or formulations on the so-called "positive list." But the EU has made this process so expensive and time consuming that many manufacturers simply can't afford the costs involved.
As a result, around 5,000 safe formulas and nutrients that have been on the market for decades will soon be banned.
Saving Us From Ourselves
Of course, these regulations were all passed under the guise of "protecting the public." According to the World Health Organization, popular alternative medicines are often "misused" and may "harm patients." They point out that the "incorrect use" of alternative therapies has caused deaths in wealthy countries where more and more patients rely on them.
You could also argue that the incorrect use of kitchen knives, water skis, and even plastic bags have all caused deaths. Not to mention the use of AMA-sanctioned medical procedures and FDA-approved drugs. The key phrase here is "incorrect use."
The WHO could do everyone a service by first addressing the incorrect use of accepted mainstream therapies that have caused far more widespread death and adverse reactions than natural medicine therapies ever have or ever will.
Although they are few and far between, there are mistakes and fatalities associated with alternate therapies, supplements and herbal remedies. It's always important to keep in mind that many of the compounds and herbs used in natural medicine treatments are very powerful. They have risks and potential side effects, which is why I always recommend that you work closely with skilled natural medicine practitioners whenever you use these therapies.
But even with their cautions, natural remedies are far, far safer than prescription drugs, and one reason might be the users themselves. An article published in the journal Psychologist noted that people who seek out natural and alternative treatments are generally more health conscious than non-users, and believe that by making sound lifestyle choices they can influence their own health.
But not if the EU has anything to say about it.
Where's the "Fight for Freedom" When You Need It?
You'd think that such blatant abuse of power to restrict people's personal liberty would have our own self-proclaimed freedom-loving government up in arms (literally). But there's an even darker side to all this, and it has little -- if anything -- to do with health or looking out for people's best interests.
Even if the American government didn't want to go along with the regulations imposed by the EU Directive, we really wouldn't have a choice. In fact, the United States never has acknowledged or stated any form of acceptance for the EU Directive. But hard as it is to believe, this "directive" can actually override U.S. law if it isn't stopped in Europe.
As a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO), the U.S. will be bound by any finalized standards put forth in the directive.
If we choose to ignore the regulations our WTO-affiliation binds us to, we would face severe trade sanctions with other WTO countries, which could potentially cripple part of our economy. And there's no way that our already anti-natural medicine government is going to let that happen over access to vitamins and minerals. So the best way to ensure it doesn't get to that point is to do everything we can to stop it now -- before it happens.
Protect Your Rights With These Three Steps
There are three actions to take. The most urgent is to support a case brought by the British Alliance for Natural Health to overturn the European Food Supplements Directive. In January 2004, the alliance's attorneys (a firm which has successfully had another European Directive overturned) won the first round in the High Court of Justice in London. The appeal was referred to the European Court of Justice.
(Please visit the alliance's Web site, read about their case and, most importantly, make a donation to support their efforts to protect everyone's supplements, including yours. Even a few dollars will help. A few dollars from each of us will add up. If we can help them overturn this food supplement dictatorship in Europe, it won't ever come here.)
The second action I urge you to take is to write, call and e-mail your state's senators and congressmen. Tell your senators to oppose S.722, the Dietary Supplement Safety Act, and tell your congressmen to oppose H.R. 3377, the Dietary Supplement Access and Awareness Act. These two bills put the wheels in motion for restrictions similar to those outlined in the EU Directive to become U.S. law, which would be even more threatening to us than just an international code of standards.
These extremely dangerous and misnamed proposals would allow the FDA to "roll back" most of the small amount of health care freedom you and I regained with the 1994 "DSHEA" law we all fought so hard for. Even if we're successful in helping the Alliance for Natural Health defeat the European Food Supplements Directive, if these bills are passed into law, our supplement choices will shrink dramatically anyway.
The final step to take is to tell your U.S. senators and congressmen to support U.S. Rep. Ron Paul's H.R. 1146, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act. This accurately named (for once) legislation would make the Constitution of the United States the supreme law of the land again, and restore law-making and judging power to our elected representatives and American courts, respectively. Please don't leave this off your list. In the long run, it's the most important action of the three.
Please make a donation of any size to the Alliance for Natural Health as soon as you can. Then, please write, call, fax, and e-mail your U.S. Senators and Representatives as often as you can, telling them to oppose S. 722 and H.R. 3377, and to support American freedom by voting for H.R. 1146.
For further information on the European Union Directive on Dietary Supplements and on the Codex Alimentarius legislation, contact the American Holistic Health Association (www.ahha.org), the Alliance for Natural Health (www.alliance-natural-health.org), or the International Advocates for Health Freedom (www.iahf.com).
Don't wake up next August to find your supplements gone for good. Join me in taking action now, and recruit everyone you can to join the battle. While our troops are fighting for your freedom and mine overseas, you and I can literally fight for American freedom right here at home.
Dr. Jonathan Wright is the Medical Director and founder of the Tahoma Clinic in Renton, Wash., where he also practices medicine. A Harvard University (A.B. 1965) and University of Michigan graduate (M.D. 1969), Dr. Wright has taught natural biochemical medical treatments since 1983 to thousands of physicians in the U.S., Europe, and Japan. In 1973, Dr. Wright founded the Tahoma Clinic, which focuses on disease prevention and treatment by natural biochemical and bioenergetic means.
11-03-2004, 03:03 PM
WTF, over? What's this got to do with anything relating to the REAL world (and aikido or budo specifically)? Other than what your teacher does for a living?
No, seriously ...
The EU has NOTHING to do with FDA regulation. They disagree pretty seriously. Please tell us what the point is.
Now, I don't disagree that some things the FDA has done are idiotic, but connecting these things makes no real sense. Clarify, please.
No spam, please, but thanks for trying.
11-03-2004, 10:53 PM
How about turning down the dink knob a little.
This is an open forum where we can ask questions not related to budo. I received this and was curious as to what other, probably more informed, people thought about it. I was also interested in hearing from people who live in Europe who would have more detailed info from that end.
The reason: just curiosity
I normally like what you have to say, even if I don't exactly agree with it every time but what's up with the attitude lately?
Take your meds and get over yourself (I read that somewhere)
11-04-2004, 03:33 AM
I was going to wait until I'd gotten some responses so as not to taint the posting with my ideas....but since no one else seems interested.
I think the author paints a particularly doomist picture. I don't have any facts as this is the first I've heard about it (hence the post, seeking more info). My experience tells me that when people start preaching doom and gloom from either end of an issue the reality usually ends up somewhere in the middle.
p.s. Here I was getting online at 4:30 a.m. to rip into you from my safe zone across the ether, only to find you had replied in a reasonable, affable manner....damn you Chuck, damn you ;)
11-16-2004, 02:06 PM
I know that the FDA has recently banned effedra (spelling?) because of possible extremely negative effects it can have on people. My ex's brother got seizures or something after taking effedra, not really sure what it was, but they are VERY debilitating and required a hospital visit. He had no idea before taking effedra that it would do that to him. Of course, he had problems with other med's also, mostly from over the counter.
I do think that there needs to be some sort of control, even if something simple like a "Taking Supplement at Own Risk" warning being required on the package. I am absolutely against all out bans, because I don't want people deciding what's good for me, so why should I decide what's good for them?
My guess on the article is that it is pre-reactionary-over-reaction (great new phrase) to a fear about this type of legislation, although I honestly do NOT know what the FDA has to do with the WTO, EU, or anything else outside of the jurisdiction of the USA. Honestly I only skimmed the article because of its length and I am NOT an expert, just an American citizen trying to be informed and objective. Later, I may look up those bills cited to see what they say.
PS How is life in Kalamazoo? I am in Ypsilanti myself.