PDA

View Full Version : Glass ceiling in the dojo pecking order?


Please visit our sponsor:
 

AikiWeb Sponsored Links - Place your Aikido link here for only $10!


Unregistered
12-04-2002, 04:01 PM
How does it work in your dojo?

I've heard of places where people progress in rank based on ability alone. Students can "overtake" those who were senior but are progressing slower.

I've also heard of places where the pecking order is more or less fixed by both rank and time in training at the dojo. A student who is learning faster than his "seniors" can't be promoted above them at all--he/she has to wait and get promoted "with" them at the very earliest.

Anyone have experience one way or the other, comments on the "rightness" of one or the other, past frustrations? How did you resolve those?

Anon.

Unregistered
12-04-2002, 04:29 PM
...I've heard of places where people progress in rank based on ability alone.... ... A student who is learning faster than his "seniors" can't be promoted above them at all--he/she has to wait and get promoted "with" them at the very earliest....
HHAAHAHAHAHA ....*cough*...AHAHAHHAHAHAHA....

Sorry - at the dojo I belongED to people were promoted above their seniors not based on ability, but on whether they were friends with the people who ran the place, or were taking on assistant instructor role.

If people were promoted on ability alone at this particular place, there would not be a lot of people training, nor did they wait 'till their seniors were promoted to be tested at the same time.

Unregistered
12-04-2002, 06:17 PM
i dont know what you mean by "glass ceiling" but where i train ranking is determined by both time and ability. you cant go for another rank without doing a certain amount of training time, and without having a certain amount of ability. so if you put in the hard work, it is possible to pass who were previously your sempai, as i have myself done.

oh and just for interests sake, we dont have a formal grading day, instead when you feel you are ready for a grading you tell the sensei and the grading takes place in small increments at the end of class for however long it takes. if a section of the grading is not satisfactory the grading will be stopped for that day and continued later..... i dont believe there are any failed gradings, just gradings that take a lot longer.... so far i think the longest has been over 2 weeks. oh and there is a student who started his grading and has now dissapeared from the dojo halfway through without finishing it. we haven't seen him in months.

Unregistered
12-04-2002, 08:00 PM
I've been training a long time, and have been passed by too many people to count. It is because I am not extremely adept at picking things up, and because, although I train regularly, train only 3-4 times a week. It used to bother me, but not so much anymore. I figure I've got seasoning behind me, that some higher ranked folks don't have, even if they might be better technicians. It's not a competition.

anon

Fiona D
12-05-2002, 07:06 AM
I've never come across the 'glass ceiling' so far, and I'm very glad! I've not been practising Aikido long enough to grade yet -in the club where I train there is a compulsory 6-month wait, then sensei decides whether you know your stuff well enough to do the grading. From there, you'll advance if your technique is good enough to pass.

In Jiu Jitsu, which I have been training for 7 years, I have progressed rather more slowly than many people, for various reasons. I'd hate to feel that I was holding someone else back by not grading (or by going for it and failing on account of being not quite ready). Grading progressions should be done according to individual ability, otherwise the whole thing becomes meaningless.

Ta Kung
12-05-2002, 08:05 AM
In the dojo I go to, we aren't allowed to grade until we have the minimum amount of time since last grading AND also the minimum amount of attended classes since last grading. Only then are you allowed to give it a try. Of course, you don't pass unless sensei thinks you have what it takes... :eek:

Usually, people pass. :)

I think this method is good. I've seen clubs where students have 3:kyu, and (imho) they do not have the skill one would expect from that rank.

Regards,

Patrik

Creature_of_the_id
12-05-2002, 08:10 AM
our association grades on ability alone.

If you think you are good enough, you grade. If you are not... then you fail.

Right up until shodan that it, when you are invited to grade when the head of the dojo thinks you are ready for it.

I've been over taken by more people than I can count.

:)

Ta Kung
12-05-2002, 08:26 AM
This thread makes me think of my time as a Taekwon-do practitioner. In some clubs, you could have a black belt within 1-2 years... When I found out, I lost a bit of my respect for those clubs.

Greg Jennings
12-05-2002, 08:30 AM
If I'm reading the original post clearly, the issue is:

- The student _has_ the ability
- The student _has_ the time in grade in terms of calendar time and number of classes attended, seminars attended, etc.

...but...

- The student is not allowed to test because he/she will be promoted over students who have been paying members of the dojo for a longer period of time.

I've heard of this happening. I.e., that a student who...

is more athletic, picks things up faster, is more dedicated (both to training and maintaining the dojo), has been lucky (or skillful) enough to avoid downtime due to injuries, etc, etc.

... is held back in the name of "maintaining dojo harmony".

I think this sucks mightily!!!

Sincerely,

Ta Kung
12-05-2002, 10:17 AM
I think this sucks mightily!!!

I agree 100%.

/Patrik

flip_side
12-05-2002, 11:03 AM
ohhh i dont' know. i've been catching up to my seniors . circumstances are different for everyone and in my dojo this has been recognized. You see, I haven't had a baby lately ; nor been sent to Afghanistan; nor have I torn my Acl, ETC. SO I have logged time and had the opportunity to catch up.

it's been not necessarily good for me, and not so good for the dojo/harmony. It's hard to keep things in perspective , because reality is those people who've trained longer than me, in general they're better than me at this. They just haven't been able to have the continuity, and in some case the interest in the testing itself.How do you feel about ranking over someone whose abilities you sense are more polished than yours?

nothing's perfect.

My only consolatioin when I think about this, is that this is a private journey with no end (in sight) , so it shouldn't really matter

I'm sure though I'd be griping if I felt being held back artificially

MikeE
12-05-2002, 12:20 PM
You are not responsible for anyone's training but your own.

Unregistered
12-05-2002, 05:03 PM
You are not responsible for anyone's training but your own.

True, but as such, nobody should be held hostage to someone else's training or progress, either.

Flip_Side--I see your point I guess, but I think I'd be more worried about the situation Greg describes above--someone who has done the time, done the right number of hours, has the repertoire and the technique down, but is then required to "wait" because his senior isn't ready? That just doesn't seem right. It's not the guy's fault who's ready that someone had a baby, or got injured, or decided to take a break from training, or went to Afghanistan. There may be a lot of that last thing happening soon, will everyone in dojo worldwide have to put testing on hold until those folks get home and catch up?

IMHO, "sucks mightily" sums it up right nicely.

Chris Li
12-05-2002, 05:15 PM
... is held back in the name of "maintaining dojo harmony".



I think this sucks mightily!!!
Reminds me of a story:

Mitsugi Saotome's been training for a number of years and finally grasps something about kokyu. M. Ueshiba calls him over and says "Do you understand?". Saotome answers "Yes, I understand", and M. Ueshiba says "Good, I'll make you an 8th dan.".

K. Ueshiba, however, has a number of objections - Saotome's too young, other people are ahead of him, there's the structure of the organization to consider, etc..

Anyway, he didn't get the promotion :).

Best,

Chris

pointy
12-06-2002, 04:06 AM
Anyway, he didn't get the promotion
yeah but all those guys were/are very political about that stuff.

it doesnt mean we have to all follow the same dopey example, even if we do "steal" their aikido :) .

it would stink to put in the hours and money, and not get your recognition (if you're into that sort of thing) because of some slow person taking their time at the top.

peace

evan

Unregistered
12-06-2002, 06:13 AM
I would like the original poster of this thread to write back and clarify if there really is a system where you cannot be promoted until the person senior to you is promoted. I know of one organization that did this (maybe still does), and it left a number of aikidoka with 30 years of training at 2nd Dan. Is it that extreme, or is it possibly that the poster is some young upstart who has his/her required minimum hours and is not being allowed to test because the minimum is just that?

While I don't agree with the system of holding folks back to wait for their seniors, I also don't agree with letting folks test immediately because they have enough hours/days. It is important to have real time into aikido to be testing for more senior ranks (2nd kyu and above in this instance), instead of just rushing for the rank. I had an instance a number of years ago when a highly competitive young aikidoka told me that she was going to reach shodan before me, and she had been training for 8 months (had already reached 3rd kyu if you can believe it), and I had been training (3 times a week, consistently) for 13 years. I was appalled by that competitive attitude, and it was fostered by a system that allowed for testing after minimum hours. I had trained elsewhere for 8 years, had lost all my rank when I started at my new dojo, and took the tact of waiting for the teacher to "ask" me to test instead of signing up when I had the hours. That certainly didn't mean we were at the same level after her 8 months of training (BTW, she quit training after 1.5 years, and 8 years later, I am still training). Anyway, it might be that kind of competitive attitude that the dojo-cho is trying to avert.

Just my $.02

Unregistered
12-06-2002, 08:06 AM
"I would like the original poster of this thread to write back and clarify if there really is a system where you cannot be promoted until the person senior to you is promoted."

I don't know. I was talking to some friends and this came up. The conversation got hypothetical, "what if there was this really fast learner and he was being held back by such a system" that kind of thing. Someone said they knew of a situation like that, but I don't actually myself, so I don't know the details or if it's even real. I got to thinking about the concept, though, it seemed a little odd to me, and I wondered what others might think; hence the post.

I agree completely with you in the situation you cite below, and I agree that minimum hours or minimum time don't and shouldn't, all by themselves, make someone eligible for promotion. I agree the kind of attitude and competition you experienced would be counterproductive at the least, but that wasn't part of what started the thread. The discussion/situation that provoked the post was more along the lines that some folks have mentioned above and which you allude to when you said "While I don't agree with the system of holding folks back to wait for their seniors,".

Unregistered
12-06-2002, 08:31 AM
Thank you for your response. It was a good post and raised interesting questions and responses.

I like the method personally, of waiting to be asked by the teacher to test, and having that the mandatory system within the dojo. Unless the teacher plays favorites, it works very well.

gassho

Bruce Baker
12-06-2002, 09:21 AM
What in the world are you training for if you are training for rank?

That should be the last thing on your mind. Rank is merely the acknowledgement of having gained proficientcy. As far as the pecking order is important, it is merely a way to maintain order. If your skills are progressing, who cares what others think?

Get a grip! It is both the way of society and the way of humanity to create some kind of order to prevent chaos ... although I do believe a shot of choas now and then does bring many a swelled head down to earth again.

Ain't no colored belt, or telling people you trained in this or that gonna save you when the line is drawn in the sand, at that point ... what you do will speak for itself. That, and that alone, is why you train ... to be ready, and able to deal with the situation at hand.

I shouldn't talk, it has taken me ten years to learn how to use technique over bodily strength, and that was only due to an illness that nearly left me beddridden. The physical authority of mastering martial arts, Aikido or any other art, is the easy path to bypassing the more important issue of polishing the stone of ones internal well being, as well as using the distraction of physical practice to force one to connect to the body and mind.

I would be happy to give you a bucket of rocks if you feel you must throw stones at the glass ceiling, but make sure it is not your own house, or the illusion of grandure that brings these thoughts and visions to your mind?

Yes, we are imperfect beings, and yes, there will be those dojos that have implimented the very system you are alluding to, but who cares?

It is your determination that lets you persevere to learn all you can from who ever you train with, and your awareness that allows you to move on when that training is done, or is going nowhere fast.

You want a black belt? I can name at least four martial arts within twenty miles of my home that will accomandate your wishes, but does that make you a practitioner of martial arts, or a short term street punk who can punch and kick a few rounds of practice sparring?

Don't be too upset, the thinking of the glass ceiling is quite normal in younger years before you approach the half century mark in age, just don't let it rule your life, or you truly will create the environment that you are alluding to.

Unregistered
12-06-2002, 10:43 AM
"Thank you for your response"

You're welcome, thank you for the question.

Your post made me think about "competition" and what a dojo-cho who imposed a "glass ceiling" sort of policy might achieve. I'm thinking out loud here so bear with me. These are just some thoughts that I don't have a lot invested in one way or the other.

Seems to me it could cut both ways. On the one hand, it might do good by teaching students that their training and progression are their own, so they should not compete with others even in their own heads. On the other hand, this (I'm in the US in case that isn't obvious) isn't Japan (I've never been), and competition is part of our culture, like it or not.

There's a one-liner I heard long ago that goes somthing like "That some should be rich shows that others may become rich," which might apply in the dojo as well. In other words, if a dojo had a really gifted student who was learning very quickly AND/OR devoting a lot of time and sincerity to his training, if his behavior was impeccable, and he/she was a great example to other students, it might serve as a real motivator to the other students to see this one progress according to his talent.

If, instead, it became clear to all the students that someone was being held back, this could be a powerful de-motivator for everyone, and might ultimately sew a great deal of discord as everyone tries to figure out how or if such a policy might affect them as well.

Last--someone above mentioned they'd hate to be the one holding anyone else back because of seniority. I'd bet that's true of just about everyone, including me and I'll bet you, too. In fact, if we could find a person who thinks their seniority ought to be protected somehow in spite of superior ability, sincerity, skill, etc. demonstrated by another student, what would that say about that person? Isn't that also a pretty darned nasty form of "competition" that ought to be avoided? Is this an "aiki" attitude, or plain selfishness and conceit that's harmful to everyone, yet is encouraged if it's rewarded?

Again, those are off-the-top-of-the-head thoughts. I'll appreciate your thoughtful comments!

Young-In Park
12-06-2002, 10:46 AM
What in the world are you training for if you are training for rank?
You mean to tell me some people only train for rank? In martial arts? I've never heard of such a thing... (sic)

YoungIn Park

Edward
12-06-2002, 11:48 AM
It seems to me that senior students training 2-3 times a week in average do not very much appreciate someone who just started aikido, is dedicated to a 6 times a week practice, doesn't seem to have any problems learning the techniques fast and efficiently, and on the top of that, rightfully climbs the kyu ladder and is quickly catching up with them. It happened to me, and I almost lost my membership at the dojo, had to skip one exam, fail the other (to the surprise of all), so that I could regain some of my seniors' approval, and even now, almost none of my seniors take me as a partner during training unless there are no other options left. Honestly I believe that I really broke the dojo's harmony, and I very much regret that. The Japanese believe that the unity of the group is more important than the individuals forming it. We Westerners find difficulties accepting and understanding this concept, and we readily shout: Injustice. Eventhough I am still bitter about this matter, and lost some of my interest and illusions, I am still practicing 6 times a week, not for the belt, but for my own benefit, and for the fun of it. There is still one problem however: several new members followed my (good or bad)example and started coming to practice diligently every day, and are advancing in rank quickly, hopefully not too quickly...

Edward
12-06-2002, 12:06 PM
P.S.

Rank is just an artificial thing, but people's real value and abilities are fortunately so easily noticed in aikido. It is only natural and human that seniors dislike ambitious juniors. In my opinion, better not to disrupt your group's cohesion and become the black sheep. As I said, every one knows your aikido's worth, so there is absolutely no need to prove it by rank. This is another valuable lesson that you can learn from aikido ;)

paw
12-06-2002, 12:59 PM
Rank is just an artificial thing, but people's real value and abilities are fortunately so easily noticed in aikido.

If rank is artificial why have it? What purpose does it serve?

If rank indicates a level of technical skill, why not award it when it is deserved? Why have time in rank requirements? Further, why do some (most?) organizations stop testing for rank and assign advanced rank for reasons other than technical skill?

If rank indicates the quality of the instructor or a body of technical knowledge, why do examinations not indicate this or attempt to measure it?

Why can only certain people assign rank, if it is artificial?

Who tends to get more recognition, someone of high rank, or someone who is technically competant (haven't we all seen a beginner from martial art X --- but unranked in aikido --- perform at a higher level than someone who is of higher aikido rank?)

Judd
12-06-2002, 02:01 PM
The Japanese believe that the unity of the group is more important than the individuals forming it

True. However, if the group cannot be happy for your success and support your dedication, perhaps it's their own insecurities they should worry about, and not the rank of others. If the goal is to become one with the Universal, then we all will have a hard enough time with our own faults; there is no need to worry about the faults of others. Afterall, the only true victory is self-victory, right? ;)

Bruce Baker
12-06-2002, 04:40 PM
Stop kidding around.

Every new practitioner in most martial arts may not admit he / she isn't in it for the rank, but then the whining starts when someone is promoted over him / her? So, if they really are displaying their true selves in this belly acheing, stop kidding ... it is a normal part of the early years of practice before searching about in tutorial studies.

If you can show me one dojo where students are not anxious to show their proficientcy by belt color, hakama wearing, or being acquainted as a senior student of the dojo, I would be very amazed.

I am sorry to hear about your situation Edward Karaa, but there is a reason for every bad deed that is rewarded, and a silent thank you for every good deed that is not rewarded with bad fortune or ill luck.

I could be wrong, but it should make you a better person by realizing failure, contrived or not. It almost sounds like the failure was a lesson to see if you could adapt, change, and learn from it? If you did, then I would say that you will be held in high esteem, but if you do not, it will continue to be a bumpy ride.

I guess the bulk of lessons learned along the road don't sink in until you have had time to think about what has happened in relation to past events? Like wanting to test for rank, and being told you are not ready, this is the overanxiousness of youth, and the shortsightedness of wanting recognition.

I have seen some awefully poor practitioners make great progress, but it took one to two years, and it wasn't always reinforced with the broader knowledge of how it could work or come from other places besides Aikido, which left them with the lacking skills of real usage verses practice.

I think that half of those that attain the coveted black belt are not in martial arts for the long haul of having it be a lifetime practice, at least that is my experience living in the east coast of the USA. Just in my past experience of Karate I can name a dozen people who gave up all martial arts once they hit 40-45 years old. And it wasn't always injurys or money that ended their practice.

No. Sorry.

Experience teaches me that maybe one person in a hundred of starting practitioners will practice their whole life because they love what they do.

Most people are in it for the recognition and bragging rights.

I don't intend to fight the flaw of humanity that would have it this way, that is what makes us human.

Realize there is not always a definitive answer, just those of us who learn from problems, do the best we can, then move on.

Although it is nice to have some practice before getting into trouble without a net?

Edward
12-06-2002, 11:23 PM
We often hear in martial arts that rank is not important, and that your belt is meant only to hold your gi together. But just by the frequency of hearing these comments, we should know that there is an underlying problem, otherwise we wouldn't hear this so often.

In my opinion, rank has value and importance in every human activity. Whether you work at a company, you are an employer, at the army, at school, even at home, people always have their place and rank, and this is how you keep order and avoid chaos. This of course tends to be more emphasized in oriental cultures. I have noticed that usually in the east, rank and seniority are given not to the person with the best skills or abilities, nor judged by the amount of hard work one puts into his group or company, but rather through the date of admission to the group. A person who started working on December 6 will have higher status than his or her colleague who started at December 7.

Now in a martial arts dojo, rank is not only a vain means to show off, which is the side most people tend to see and criticize. Rank gives you status whithin the dojo and beyond. It gives you leadership and responsibility. You will become a model to the junior students, who will come to you for advice. Therefore I do understand that for some people, the above privileges are very important and they would do anything to hold on to them. I find many similarities to the corporate world, since it is also based on a pyramidal hierarchy. The higher the position, the fewer the numbers. And more politics, of course.

That is in my opinion the reason of the frequent discontent we usually hear from Western aikido practitioners, but almost never from our Oriental counterparts who understand the system and accept it as is.

I think that we too should understand and accept this system and not hold grudges and bad feelings, because this is a traditional martial art, based on traditional oriental values that we should help upkeeping, and also because otherwise we would disrupt our group harmony and take the fun out of our training.

Chris Li
12-06-2002, 11:48 PM
We often hear in martial arts that rank is not important, and that your belt is meant only to hold your gi together. But just by the frequency of hearing these comments, we should know that there is an underlying problem, otherwise we wouldn't hear this so often.
I'd certainly agree with that.
That is in my opinion the reason of the frequent discontent we usually hear from Western aikido practitioners, but almost never from our Oriental counterparts who understand the system and accept it as is.
It's been my experience that squabbles over rank and control are no less common in Japan than they are anywhere else.

Best,

Chris

JO
12-07-2002, 10:49 AM
In my dojo, we have the rather usual practice of advancing in rank after having trained a pre-determined minimum of hours/days and being considered ready by the sensei. Often having the minimum number of days won't be enough if they are spread out over two long a period. The number of hours per month is considered so that someone who trains less often will take even longer to be allowed to pass his exam. In practice I have found this makes sense as it takes a certain amount of time to get back into training if you have left for a while and that those who don't show up regularly tend to advance more slowly. The basic premise the system works on is that, overall, you get what you put in. In our system it is clear that someone who shows up more will advance more rapidly, independent of the date he signed up.

Interestingly though, just yesterday I was talking with one of our dojo's yudansha and he told me he knew someone at an other dojo that was being held back, despite his skill and the fact that he is very active (ie we see him at many seminars), because a his sensei is less active and does not get promoted and a promotion would bring him to an eqaul rank. In this case the glass ceiling is determined by the rank of the sensei, even though the student is active in going out to train with other instuctors of even higher rank.

This situation seems strange to me as I have never trained in a dojo where any of the students trained harder than the chief instructor and in both cases there was another senior instructor of the same rank as the chief instructor.

These types of questions and situations always make me think of the joys and thrills of human politics. We are a social species, politics is an unavoidable aspect of this.

Paula Lydon
12-24-2002, 09:45 PM
~~I came to Aikido with 10 years other MA training and so didn't want to distract myself for the first 5 years with testing, dojo politics, soap opras; just wanted to focus of what the heart of this Aikido might be. For me this meant the study of movement, basic principles of motion and developing some notion of 'ki'.

~~After 5 years I was signing up to test 5th kyu and my sempei said she wanted to discuss it with Sensei. I was later told that the dojo policy was that no one skips tests and so I went ahead and tested for go-kyu. I've missed a few testings for different reasons and so at 6 years am ranked yon-kyu.

~~Does this affect how I train? No. Does it affect how I conduct myself on the mat in regards juniors and seniors? No. Does it change exactly where I am in my training at any moment? No. Do I move like I'm yon-kyu ranked? No. Does anyone train with me at less than my ability? No. So, whatever...

~~Truth to tell, I really only started testing to 'stir the pot' as it were. Expose myself to a greater range of observation and feedback; to commit to my dojo; to lay myself at the feet of the full process and see what might be wrought. If I ever reach sho-dan I will one of...how many thousands? HA-HA!

Lyle Bogin
12-30-2002, 11:12 PM
I feel like the people I train with rank me in their own minds.

I often do the same. And the ranks change quite a bit.

Erik
12-31-2002, 02:44 AM
~~After 5 years I was signing up to test 5th kyu and my sempei said she wanted to discuss it with Sensei. I was later told that the dojo policy was that no one skips tests and so I went ahead and tested for go-kyu.
Do I move like I'm yon-kyu ranked? No. Does anyone train with me at less than my ability? No. So, whatever...
Just a thought for whatever it's worth.

This may affect your fellow students. Imagine a 5th kyu looking at you and trying to decide if he/she is ready for 4th kyu. While we often decry the ego, it's just as often that the reverse is true and students are very insecure.

"You mean that's a 4th kyu? Boy, I really do suck."

Thalib
12-31-2002, 03:02 AM
Oh... that's not so bad...

I've seen shodans that won't even pass 3rd kyu in our dojo.

Bruce Baker
12-31-2002, 09:27 AM
You know .... we all have storys of how we have practiced, and practiced, and practiced, and in our own eyes we have learned nothing of noteworthy description to tell others.

Kind of like the story about the young man who slapped a bowl of water day in and day out, went home after a time, and told his reletives he had learned nothing. When they persisted in asking the same question, again and again, he slapped his hand on the table and it broke into splinters.

Learned nothing, eh?

I guess it is the same for anything you do, and any position you hold in life ... you do it day in and day out until you are not quite sure why you do it until it is measured against something else, another situation in another context?

Well, that is how I feel about rank. Until it is measured outside of the dojo, used and applied to your life situation, it is not relevent. So, why should you dwell on rank in any phase of life? Unless you have a narrow vision that craves power without knowledge, let it go.

True knowledge applys to situations when you need it, and those who have knowledge never think or consider to use it for selfish means, if they are truly balanced in their minds and happy in their lives.

Herein lies the key to ignorance is bliss.

I think it should be, if you ignore selfish gains that force you to unhappiness, your life will bring you bliss.

Stupid simplicity is exactly the key we need to be happy, but being responsible for those more simple than we are is the role of responsiblity heaped upon us.

I don't know how many times you have been called upon to be responsible or a leader, but sooner or later it happens to us all, whether we want it or not.

Those of us who do not, try to find others who are either better suited to take over, or just let the fates find another who will take the lead. Darwin was somewhat correct in his thesis of natural selection, except he forgot about the sneaky bastard who hides among the sheep.

My opinion.

Be the big great leader, endure the pressure, the accolades, I want no part of it.

Life is too short to be bossed and led about by followers who demand you teach, or absorb the days of your life ... I have my own life to live, don't need no army telling me to teach, lead , or absorb my short time on earth.

You go ahead.

Get that rank.

Be the line leader.

Get your name in the big book of Martial Arts.

Let people bow to you .... fetch and carry you items.

I will be kicking back, strumming my guitar, and sitting in the sun ...

Oh, if you get free, come visit. Unlike you, I have time to do what I want, and think what I want.

I might see you at practice, but ....

Ain't no rank gonna trap me!

rachmass
12-31-2002, 09:42 AM
There was a really terrific article about rank and testing by Sensei Auge, that was posted a few months back

http://www.aikiweb.com/testing/auge2.html

I think Mr. Auge makes great sense in this, and maybe it is time to revisit the article. Rank does have its purpose, although it is an individuals decision whether they want to test or not, as Mr. Baker points out. I am all for testing, and do think it has great value. This is off the topic of the glass ceiling a bit.....

Happy New Year to all!

Rachel