The Content of the Communication by Paul Schweer
[Discuss this article (0 replies)]
[Download this article in PDF format]
I was, once upon a time in a life now long gone, a United States
Marine. Through some still unexplained clerical error, I was promoted
to Sergeant after thirty-five months active duty. I learned the
language required by the job. Melodic, colorfully profane and
passionate, regardless of volume or context. I learned it best I
could, but never quite got it right. The more I tried to learn it,
the more I appreciated those who could do it well. Even now, when
channel surfing, I'll sometimes come across Mail Call and just listen
for a while; GySgt Ermey makes me smile, even when edited for
television.
When I got out I quickly learned (disproving the myth that 'educable
Marine' is an oxymoron) that the language I'd learned was not welcome
in the civilized world. As I've come to understand the rules, one may
perform pretty much any sort of forceful aggression or underhanded
perversity, as long as one is civil about it. So for a couple years I
kept a cup in the kitchen, which my wife soon took to calling the
'potty mouth cup', and put a dollar in it each time I cursed. I lost
a lot of good money to that bleeping cup.
I learned, eventually, to rein it in. But I haven't yet learned
(maybe I is an oxymoron after all) any better way to communicate
certain things. So on occasions that are now thankfully infrequent,
the Sergeant returns from wherever he now resides, stands erect, and
speaks for me. Forceful and gleefully profane, if not musically
eloquent -- it is a mode of communication that I still understand.
Certainly one I recognize when I see it.
Last night I saw it, full blown, on the mat. In the middle of class.
I've never seen anything like it on the mat. It could not have been
pleasant for anyone there. It was ugly. And vile. Brazenly
spiteful.
And necessary. I'm glad it's done. I just wish it could have got
done differently.
Our dojo-cho was teaching the class, and on the receiving end. He
somehow managed to ignore the mode of delivery and deal only with the
content of the communication. He seemed to agree, in fact, with the
content. But what impresses me, in retrospect, is how he ignored the
ranting maniac and dealt only with the man. I don't think, had I been
him, I could have done that.
But I am not him.
I am the guy who let him have it. In the middle of class. In front
of everybody.
I am the guy who saw a stark illustration of how very far I have to
go.
[Discuss this article (0 replies)]
|