Big Mind, Little Mind by George S. Ledyard
[Discuss this article (5 replies)]
[Download this article in PDF format]
Aikido is so large that it is often too great for its
practitioners to wrap their minds around. Some have suggested that
the way in which Aikido Founder, Morihei Ueshiba, expressed himself
about this art was too obscure for his students. Well of course it
was...
O-Sensei was a Shinto mystic. He wasn't trying to explain Aikido to
the world. He was trying to put people on a Path that would eventually
lead them to recognition of the true nature of the Universe. This is
fundamentally an experiential reality; issues of intellectual
understanding or not understanding miss the mark. Aikido, as the
Founder saw it, was a means for an individual to purify himself and
directly experience the truth of the nature of things. It was meant to
be a form of misogi or purification. Technique is the physical
expression of the very principles which combine to create the Universe
itself
Most traditional peoples have the idea that the rituals which they
perform as part of their religious practice on some level create the
reality which manifests before them in the Universe. In other words
their very actions are important in maintaining the natural order and
Man's place in it. So, the idea that our actions shaped the natural
order as we know it was fundamental to archaic religious thinking
whereas modern man requires multi-million dollar studies to tell him
the same thing.
For a mystic like O-Sensei, not only is ones practice a way to
investigate and express ones understanding of universal principles but
it is also a way of actually creating the world according to these
ideal forms. In other words your practice, if it is done in the proper
way, contributes to putting the human world into accordance with the
natural world. The majority of Asian religions believe that we are
essentially in harmony with the nature of things all the time but it
is our ignorance which prevents us from seeing this. So we require
all sorts of spiritual practices in order to gain the realization that
we were all in harmony with the nature of all things all
along. O-Sensei's frame of reference is no different.
The Kannagara no Michi or Way of the Kami is eternal
and ever present. It is only in our minds that we are separate,
controlling our own actions and destinies. For virtually all Asian
religions, this illusion of separateness is the fundamental cause of
disorder in our lives. For O-Sensei, not only was Aikido supposed to
offer a way to discover the natural order of which we are an integral
part but it was also a way to move the whole human race towards that
realization. Just as in modern physics in which the equations would
indicate that every electron in the universe is interactive with every
other on some level, the actions of even one individual doing Aikido
will shift things in the universe as a whole in a positive
direction. This was how O-Sensei could view Aikido as something that
could "unite the world".
Some people do not consider themselves to be in the Ueshiba line of
Aikido. Others have no real sense of what O-Sensei did or believed and
see Aikido as the outer form, the collection of spiral techniques and
movements which give the art its distinctive look. From the standpoint
of the mystic, this is ok. Just as many religions, even modern ones,
have stated that it is not necessary for the practitioner to
understand a ritual as long as he does the ritual properly; it will
still have the same potency. Aikido is much the same. In order to do a
technique properly the practitioner will be forced to align himself
with the principles which govern that technique. In this sense, as Tom
Read Sensei has often pointed out, the technique pre-exists and the
practitioner is on some level bringing himself into accord with it. So
whether he is in any sense aware of it, on an energetic level, the
Aikido practitioner is creating and re-creating the universe through
his technique and this will inevitably shift us all collectively
towards that state in which we are in harmony with the Universe or the
Kami.
Dogen, one of the great of Buddhist teachers, was famous for
elucidating the idea of shikan taza, which literally means
"just sit". He pointed out that one doesn't sit (meditate) in order
to attain Enlightenment because we are already Enlightened. If the
Universe is truly One, then any notion of Enlightened as opposed to
un-Enlightened was essentially dualistic, an incorrect way of seeing
things. He pointed out that merely by doing the action of "sitting"
one was achieving unification without the need for koans,
levels of satori, deepening understanding etc. Proper practice
was Enlightenment!
O-Sensei's view of Aikido was not different than this I think. On
an energetic level merely doing the practice, performing the forms
over and over is Enlightenment, it is moving the world closer to that
state of Harmony about which he spoke. It doesn't matter if one thinks
one is doing a "spiritual practice" or not, the doing of it is
creating the energy which will produce the coming together of Man into
Harmony with the Way of the Kami. This is why, I believe, that the
Founder didn't make more of an effort to inculcate his students with
his spiritual beliefs. He believed that continuous practice would both
bring not only the practitioner into accord with the Way but also
society as a whole.
But what does this say about how we practice our art? If Aikido can
be viewed as primarily an energetic practice, how does its form as a
martial art relate to that? O-Sensei wasn't the first or the last to
note that serious pursuit of the martial arts had benefits beyond mere
capability for fighting. Focus on what can be destructive and life
denying can cast what is creative and life affirming into high
relief. In most Asian societies the Warrior was second only to the
Divine Royalty and then Priests in status (the Peasants were often
theoretically placed high on the list but in practice were always on
the bottom). The recognition that the values of service, courage, self
sacrifice, frugality, etc. that went with warrior-hood placed them
higher on the scale of people who modeled the society's ideals than
artisans and especially the merchants whose livelihood involved
personal gain and constant calculation of profit and loss. (It is
interesting to note that today's world is dominated by the merchant
with the accompanying commoditization of all aspects of society,
profit and loss being the essential determinant of value whether of a
life or an idea).
So the association with martial practice as spiritual practice is
as old as Mankind. Virtually no traditional martial arts, regardless
of culture, would be devoid of some religious / spiritual
underpinnings that were part and parcel of the practice of the art. It
was O-Sensei's genius to see that this went far beyond the values and
insights developed as a natural outcome of the warrior lifestyle. He
saw that the martial encounter itself was a microcosm for the
essential energies of creation and destruction, positive and negative,
attraction and repulsion, etc. One could structure the practice in
such a way that these energies could be played out without actually
having anyone be destroyed. One could change the structure of what had
been pure combat and create a form in which all of the energies could
play out and find the essential balance which all things naturally
gravitate towards.
So not only would Aikido have, in the Founders view, the benefits
traditionally associated with warrior (Samurai) values but also it
would become a practice that would actually move society towards that
essential state of Harmony, of balance which all things naturally tend
towards but which seems to elude Mankind generation after
generation. This is the energetic level of practice.
But for this to happen, practice needs to be energetically
honest. The different energetic principles have to be present for the
techniques to really bring those forces into balance. To this end the
individual pieces that comprise the art must each stand alone as
representing certain kinds of energetic output. For example a strike
like shomen uchi has to have the energy of a strike to fulfill
its energetic part in the practice. It must manifest the potentially
destructive energy of a strike (which it is) to fulfill its part in
the balance of the technique. Shomen uchi ikkyo cannot
represent the resolution of conflicting forces in a restoration of
balance when one of those forces isn't present at all. For the
creative and destructive to be resolved and held in balance there has
to be the destructive energy in the first place.
In a misguided attempt to do "Spiritual" Aikido many people
have tried to remove this from the practice. This destroys Aikido on
all levels. First of all the side of Aikido that is Budo, that reveals
the moral ethical values disappears because there is no actual
conflict taking place that creates the kind of life and death
commitment required for something to be considered Budo. This is
referred to by many as "wishful thinking Aikido". When Aikido
ceases to be a martial art and becomes merely movement or energetic
dance it has lost its identity as a form of Budo. I can find no
evidence that this was ever advocated by the Founder.
As its guise as an energetic practice which actually shapes the
world the same way that ritual properly performed shifts the nature of
things, Aikido requires that each of its technical components be
energetically pure. Each different attack, each movement, each
technique would have been seen in O-Sensei's Spiritual world as
representing an energetic principle. Each of these would have a
vibration associated with it as well as associated colors, sounds, and
even Kami. The position of your hand could express water, fire
or earth energy. A shomen uchi that wasn't REALLY a strike would not
represent what it was supposed to represent in the energetics of the
practice. This would in turn invalidate the technique such as
ikkyo which was done as an expression of balancing the energy
of that particular attack.
An attack is meant to hold the yang, potentially destructive
energy in the partner interaction. This energy can be accepted,
modified and
returned to the attacker in a variety of forms. Initially, this is a
matter of
conscious intention on the part of the student. He takes a particular
attack
and applies particular technique which results in bringing the
destructive
energy of the attack into a non-destructive balance of
forces. Something
happens as the practitioners train over the years.
As the attacker (the uke) learns to initiate an attack and
then blend with the technique executed by the defender (nage), the
nage is
doing the same thing. He is learning to blend with the energy of the
attack
rather than resist it. When two skilled practitioners train together
an
interesting thing begins to happen. Since each practitioner is
blending with
the movement / energy of the other, it becomes impossible to say who
is controlling
the technique. O-Sensei expressed this concept using the phrase
Take Musu
Aiki. This was the Founder's way of stating that if both of the
partners
are in harmony with themselves and each other (are in the state of
Aiki so to
speak) then the techniques arise spontaneously out of their
interaction.
O-sensei expressed this by saying that the Kami revealed the
techniques to
him; he didn't create them or do them himself.
What people often have a hard time understanding is that this
mutual creation of technique is not born out of some sort of collusion
between the partners. Each partner is doing his assigned job to the
utmost. The uke will initiate an attack which he executes to the best
of his ability. As nage reacts the uke begins to adjust to both
maintain his center and to keep connection so as to continue the
attack. He will continue to move towards the nage's center as long as
he can, until he is thrown and / or pinned. If he commits to this
attack without reservation then the nage moves to accept the attack
and then change the energy, not by resisting it but rather by joining
his own movement to it. He also attempts to stay centered and balanced
as he does this. If both partners achieve this, the result is a
technique which spontaneously arises out of the two energies as they
come together. Musubi is the term for this coming together. When this
occurs properly the result was effortless with neither one of the
partners feeling like an actor or acted upon.
This is a true resolution of seemingly conflicting energies brought
to their inherent balance. It is not the result of two partners
removing the energy of conflict right from the start. If there never
was a real attack then there never was a real technique. This kind of
practice is energetically false and cannot represent what O-Sensei was
doing when he did his Aikido. This does not mean that the partners are
"fighting". Real combat involves un-clarity, tricks, surprise,
dishonest energy and a desire to destroy. Practice does not have
this. The attacker delivers honest commitment at 100% of his
ability. He may have the strong intention to hit but he has no desire
to injure; he is interested only in manifesting the proper energy for
his partner to work with. The defender welcomes this commitment as it
represents a gift from the attacker that allows him to manifest his
technique and create to new resolution of the conflict that was set up
by the two of them. This is practice; it is misogi, a form of
purification. It has little to do with fighting although it does serve
to show true violent conflict will result in the destruction of one or
other of the opponents as long as they hold onto the their violent
intentions.
So in the end, I will say that it is often the people who seem most
unconcerned with doing "spiritual" Aikido who seem to be generating
the kind of energy in their practice which would allow real practice
to take place. Many Aikido folks who try to artificially create some
sort of spiritual practice end up eviscerating the art rather than
developing a practice which follows the principles as outlined by the
Founder. I think we should all look at what we are doing and see if we
can get to the place in our practice in which these two approaches
aren't mutually exclusive. In other words let's strive to find the
place in which the martial and the spiritual sides of the art are in
balance.
[Discuss this article (5 replies)]
[Download this article in PDF format]
|