Hi everyone,
I just got back last night from a seminar with Morihiro Saito sensei,
and I thought I'd share some of my thoughts about it.
It's been a good week as far as aikido goes for me. Last weekend, I
had the pleasure of training with Yoshinobu Takeda sensei from
Yokohama, Japan in the Bay Area. A friend of mine from the area who
was also at Takeda sensei's seminar came back with me to train at our
dojo and to be here a few days ahead of time for Saito sensei's
seminar. And then, the last three days over the weekend were spent at
Saito sensei's seminar. All in all, it's been a good ten days or so
as far as aikido goes.
I had never seen Saito sensei before outside of pictures in his books
and a video of his demonstration in a friendship demonstration from
over 20 years ago. In addition, my own experience in "Iwama style"
aikido has been very limited, pretty much only to that which I've
seen; I'd never trained in that system before. With all this in mind,
I was very much looking forward to this weekend for a while and was
excited to attend the seminar.
The seminar was held at the Buddhist Temple in downtown Denver. When
my friend and I arrived at around 4:30pm (with the seminar officially
starting at 6pm), there was already a line of about fifty to a hundred
people waiting in line to get into the seminar area. Luckily, my
friend's teachers from Aikido Institute (Oakland, California) were
waiting pretty close to the beginning of the line, so we latched onto
them and got ourselves a good spot.
Gaku Homma sensei's Nippon Kan organization hosted the seminar, and
their organization of the seminar was something to behold. They had a
pretty big crew of people, complete with walkie talkies, ushering
people left and right, putting stamps on your hands showing you had
paid for that session (although these stamps rubbed off after about
two minutes of training), serving cookies and fruits, and so on.
Although the registration process itself seemed a bit bulky (with only
one person entering all of the registration details into a computer),
the seminar was pretty incredibly organized. We were each assigned a
number that we had to have checked each time we entered the seminar
space itself.
The seminar space was basically all covered with wrestling mats held
together by that wide medical tape stuff. It's not my favorite
surface on which to train (as it tends to catch toes and such) and
doesn't really absorb a whole lot of breakfall energy, but it wasn't
that bad this weekend since we pretty much never completed a throw
during the whole seminar as there were way too many people.
Estimating, I would say there were at least two hundred people on the
mat.
Saito sensei looks, frankly, a lot smaller in person than he does in
his books and such; I expected him to be a larger man. Of course, the
most recent picture I've seen of him must have been at least several
years old, and I've heard his health hasn't been too well recently.
He was walking with a cane whenever he was off the mat, but his
aikido, of course, looked very powerful.
With him came a few people from Iwama and other locations from Japan
including Kawabe sensei, Namai sensei, and an uchideshi named Mark who
did all of the translating throughout the seminar. I thought Mark did
a very faithful job at translation over the weekend and seemed to very
much be taking care of Saito sensei excellently as far as I could
tell.
The basic gist of the weekend went like this:
- Friday evening: ikkyo, nikkyo, sankyo
- Saturday morning: shihonage, kotegaeshi
- Saturday afternoon: koshinage, kokyunage
- Sunday morning: weapons (jo/bokken suburi, kumitachi, kumijo)
- Sunday afternoon: ushirowaza, iriminage
Saito sensei's style is quite different from the way I've been brought
up in the "aikikai hombu" style. Even worse, I've always had a
penchance for "flowy" aikido and my technique has always been pretty
"formless." Coming into this seminar with this background had me a
bit wary that I was going to be "techniqued" to death, but my fears
were unfounded.
The techniques we did were all very informative and I was doing my
darnedest to do what Saito sensei was doing. I'm sure that a lot of
the folks with whom I trained were thinking, "Sheesh -- what's up with
this person's techniques?" Nonetheless, I kept at it as well as I
could through the weekend, despite the fact that I was a fumbling
moron most of the time.
Of course, I can't go through each and every single technique that we
did over the weekend. I think it's the most number of different
techniques I've ever gone over in technical detail. Good stuff.
Despite the fact that I've never really studied under his students, I
found myself thinking, "Hey, I remember being told to do this during
this technique before," quite often throughout the weekend. Saito
sensei's influence is very strong, even in non-"Iwama" dojo.
How did I fare during the techniques? As I've said before, I'm really
no good at technical details; I must have a short attention span or
something. So, I had trouble with things like which hand do I put
into a sankyo-like grip during this particular koshinage? Does the
hand make an outside-in circle or an inside-out circle? It was an
"ugh" situation, but I slodged through it as well as I could.
I found the techniques themselves to be interesting - different for me
at times. When folks who were experienced did the techniques onto me,
they seemed to work pretty well, even when I was hanging on pretty
tightly. Of course, my techniques hardly worked at all throughout the
weekend except with "nice" uke. I'm just not used to putting that
much of a "grip" into my hands or that much "strength" into my arms
during a technique, I guess. Even the "ki no nagare" techniques
seemed a bit on the stiff side for my taste, but I come from a "flowy"
background.
Throughout the weekend, Saito sensei said that his techniques are what
O-sensei taught him. He referred constantly to the book "Budo" (that
O-sensei wrote) and said that if you take a look at what he is doing,
it is very much the same as what is in the book. He asked people to
please take what he does as what he was taught by O-sensei and to try
out these teachings as well as what we normally do.
Watching Saito sensei do techniques is an interesting sort of a
backwards reverberation, as although I've never seen him in person,
I've seen a lot of his students do what he is doing. It's definitely
neat to see the "origin" of the manner in which his students practice
aikido.
Through the weekend, I got the feeling that Saito sensei was very much
trying to preserve that which O-sensei taught him. I can very much
feel the respect and loyalty he has to what the founder gave to him,
and I very much appreciated the fact that someone out there is
allowing us an opportunity to tap into his embodiment of what he
learned. He did not say that this was any better nor worse than what
anyone else was doing, but in fact, he went out of his way to say that
everyone should go and train with as many different instructors as
they could, that we should go to different seminars and work with
different people. I really liked this feeling of his opening the door
for people to go see different people, as I very much subscribe to
that philosophy.
He also said that "ki no nagare" was usually not taught at Iwama until
students were at least third dan, but he noticed that a lot of the
teachers in Tokyo did so. In keeping up with these kinds of "newer"
methods of training, Saito sensei said that he was introducing working
with more flowing techniques with his beginning students. I thought
that was pretty interesting.
Although I didn't get close to touching Saito sensei, Namai sensei who
was walking around the mat noticed me fumbling around and paid a lot
of attention to me, providing me with his thoughts on ukemi,
iriminage, koshinage, and a few other things I was working on. In
addition, I also got to work with other teachers in the US including
Kim Peuser sensei (who helped me gently and intensely through some of
the kumijo) and Hoa Nguyen sensei (a few times, including koshinage)
of Aikido Institute, Hans Goto sensei of Bay Marin Aikido (who offered
some good insights on kumitachi), and Aviv Goldsmith of Reno Aikido
Co-op (who was gracious to extend an invitation to their Lake Tahoe
retreat next year). These people helped me personally and patiently
to get a glimpse of what Saito sensei was teaching, and I appreciate
their efforts greatly.
Nippon Kan threw an amazing party on Saturday night at their beautiful
dojo. There was plenty of yummy food there, enough even for me (and I
even went back for thirds). They have a tradition of each group
coming from different dojo coming up and singing a song for the rest
of the group. I was made an "honorary member" of Aikido Institute and
went up with them to sing a parody Tom Petty song. The folks from
North Texas were amazing, having brought instruments for their parody
song! They even had enough of a repertoire to go back up for an
encore. Wow. We decided that although we weren't that
good, our group was certainly louder.
Over the weekend, I stayed and hung around with these folks from
Oakland at a house of the parents of one of the students who had come.
It was fun being in a totally different "group" than I was used to,
and they were all very friendly and welcoming to me. Thanks goes out
to Maggie, Josh, Ted, Yuko, Darrin, Saill, Pod (sp?), Gavin, Kathy,
Kim sensei, and Hoa sensei for making me feel a part of their group.
Many other instructors were in attendance including Pat Hendricks
sensei (with her healthy, very aware baby), Dennis Tatoian sensei,
Bernice Tom sensei, Stephanie Yap sensei, and Russell Alvey sensei.
There were also some List people at the seminar. Those whom I met
included Greg Jennings, Chris Pearce (part of the aforementioned Texas
group), Sean Hollander, Dave O'Farrell, and Frank Gordon. It was too bad I couldn't
spend more time with everyone, as I was already in one "social" group
during the seminar... Cindy Paloma was there as well, and I had a fun
time training and talking geek stuff with her. She introduced me to
Stan Pranin with whom I had exchanged some pieces of e-mail with in
the past and whom I found to be very approachable and nice. I also
bumped into a couple of Rocky Izumi's students (to whom I sent my
regards).
Overall, I had a really fun time at this seminar. It was too bad that
there wasn't enough room to take any ukemi at all, but it's difficult
to find a space large enough to fit that many people. It was a good
crowd of folks from all over the place, all interested in aikido --
always a good place to be. It was great to meet new people and train
with them, and I hope to be back again the next time such a seminar
occurs.
Jun